Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Pierce Morgan interview of Ron Paul


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
24 replies to this topic

#1 TruCatzFan

TruCatzFan

    Phil 4:13

  • Joined: 21-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,470
  • Reputation: 592
HUDDLER

Posted 05 January 2012 - 11:18 AM

Aired last night after midnight live on CNN. Awesome interview. How anyone can argue with his ideals is beyond me. Take a listen



Like I said... Awesome. A fair Interview and amazing results.

#2 TruCatzFan

TruCatzFan

    Phil 4:13

  • Joined: 21-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,470
  • Reputation: 592
HUDDLER

Posted 05 January 2012 - 03:32 PM

Bump... Because people need to hear his policies.

Listen to man himself, and not what you hear about him on the news, before cementing your candidate this summer/fall

#3 Niner National

Niner National

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,580
  • Reputation: 493
HUDDLER

Posted 05 January 2012 - 03:39 PM

Paul sounded a bit senile when questioned about the John Huntsman tweet.

I think the intrigue of Paul is that he is well spoken and sounds very smart. That matters to a lot of people. It definitely helped Clinton, Obama, and Reagan get elected.

Ron Paul is the choice of the B- intellects.

#4 jbland

jbland

    Huddle Chiropractor

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 1,594
  • Reputation: 251
SUPPORTER

Posted 05 January 2012 - 03:48 PM

Paul sounded a bit senile when questioned about the John Huntsman tweet.

I think the intrigue of Paul is that he is well spoken and sounds very smart. That matters to a lot of people. It definitely helped Clinton, Obama, and Reagan get elected.

Ron Paul is the choice of the B- intellects.



Or possible the choice of thinking americans who want the constitution to mean something.

#5 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 24,872
  • Reputation: 5,779
Moderators

Posted 05 January 2012 - 03:53 PM

ffs quit bumping your own threads or I will create a ron paul sticky and throw them all in one place. Either create better threads or be ok that no one wants to talk about them within 2 hours of creation.

#6 TruCatzFan

TruCatzFan

    Phil 4:13

  • Joined: 21-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,470
  • Reputation: 592
HUDDLER

Posted 05 January 2012 - 04:00 PM

ffs quit bumping your own threads or I will create a ron paul sticky and throw them all in one place. Either create better threads or be ok that no one wants to talk about them within 2 hours of creation.


First off... Your math is flawed

Secondly... This is a video, don't want people to respond just want to make sure that this important real life info doesn't get lost underneath the whole
"Obama teleported to fuggin mars" threads.

No disrespect Panthro.

#7 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 24,872
  • Reputation: 5,779
Moderators

Posted 05 January 2012 - 04:04 PM

My math is off but my point is on.

Don't ruin it for the other Paulbots

*youre welcome for bumping it again ;)*

#8 TruCatzFan

TruCatzFan

    Phil 4:13

  • Joined: 21-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,470
  • Reputation: 592
HUDDLER

Posted 05 January 2012 - 04:12 PM

My math is off but my point is on.

Don't ruin it for the other Paulbots

*youre welcome for bumping it again ;)*


Thanks Panthro

Serious question here: could you talk it over and maybe have a vote possibly to Create a new forum especially for "the election process"

If you think about it, it makes sense. The Tinderbox is usually used for conspiracy theories and not the political scene. There are real issues that could be discussed in such a forum. I know it would probably be a pain and another forum would mean more work for mods, but it could generate more traffic on the site... I know Zod would like that.

Think about it and discuss with other mods. I'm cool either way with the decision tat is made. Just doesn't make much sense to keep real world politics in with conspiracy theories, as it obviously detracts from the real issues at hand. I'd be curious as to what other huddler's views are in the coming election year regardless if they share my views or not. Thanks for your time.

#9 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 24,415
  • Reputation: 2,347
SUPPORTER

Posted 05 January 2012 - 04:19 PM

I need to invent a conspiracy theory about why Ron Paul supporters are apparently everywhere but at the polls on election day.

#10 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 24,872
  • Reputation: 5,779
Moderators

Posted 05 January 2012 - 04:21 PM

Thanks Panthro

Serious question here: could you talk it over and maybe have a vote possibly to Create a new forum especially for "the election process"

If you think about it, it makes sense. The Tinderbox is usually used for conspiracy theories and not the political scene. There are real issues that could be discussed in such a forum. I know it would probably be a pain and another forum would mean more work for mods, but it could generate more traffic on the site... I know Zod would like that.

Think about it and discuss with other mods. I'm cool either way with the decision tat is made. Just doesn't make much sense to keep real world politics in with conspiracy theories, as it obviously detracts from the real issues at hand. I'd be curious as to what other huddler's views are in the coming election year regardless if they share my views or not. Thanks for your time.

We usually get together to talk about things like this once a month but unfortunately that's already passed for January. If I remember, I'll make a note on it, I'll bring it up for discussion in February.