Liberal media/NYTimes plays the old bury the dem party affiliation game
Posted 14 April 2009 - 05:30 PM
Posted 14 April 2009 - 05:32 PM
seems like fox makes a WHOLE lot of 'common mistakes' while organizations you deem liberal always do things intentionally. that's a very convenient worldview you've got there.
Yeah...because the NYTimes never retracts or prints a correction.
Why are you so willingly ignorant, rodeo?
Like I said...the writing style IS intentional...not a mistake. Did you even read the link?
Posted 14 April 2009 - 05:38 PM
WTH does that prove...I was saying sarcastically that yeah...they NEVER have corrections or retract statements.
But the subject here...which you're trying to deviate from by creating this dumbass strawman is...
A correction would be NYTimes incorrectly labeling a congressman as an R instead of a D.
This isn't a correctionable item...it's factually correct. It's a certain writing style and omission that's the issue you Obamabot.
Posted 14 April 2009 - 05:51 PM
what was omitted?
If you had read the link...
The Times also failed to identify Dodd as a Democrat in a June 2008 story about Dodd receiving a sweetheart mortgage interest rate from mortgage lender Countrywide Financial. By contrast, when Republican Rep. Vito Fossella of New York was charged with drunken driving in early May 2008, the Times worked his party affiliation into the second paragraph and invariably mentioned his Republican standing in its follow-up stories.
Posted 14 April 2009 - 07:57 PM
other than the libby thingy...those are RINOs anyway and voted mostly with democrats. Common mistake. Again...***** congressman...RINOs...you're not helping your point.
Fox made errors. NYTimes isn't making a factual error...it's a style of writing which masks the party affiliation EXCEPT when they see a republican in the news and want to emphasize party affiliation.
Wow you mean they voted on issues rather than party lines? fug that, hang those bastards.
Posted 14 April 2009 - 11:17 PM
Edited by Fiz, 14 April 2009 - 11:25 PM.
Posted 15 April 2009 - 06:27 AM
From now on Rodeo, just call anyone you want to convienently dismiss because they hurt your argument as a DINO and you will be all set, ok?
Posted 15 April 2009 - 06:49 AM
From now on Rodeo, just call me any time you want convienent sex. Make it hurt, don't argue. Call me DINO, ok?
Sick, man. Get a room.