How was that not helmet to helmet? It has to be on a reciever?
Pierre Thomas lowered his head
Posted 15 January 2012 - 06:06 PM
How was that not helmet to helmet? It has to be on a reciever?
Posted 15 January 2012 - 06:13 PM
Pierre Thomas lowered his head
Posted 15 January 2012 - 08:48 PM
Posted 15 January 2012 - 09:31 PM
Posted 15 January 2012 - 09:34 PM
Posted 15 January 2012 - 09:38 PM
Your season has been over for weeks so I figured you would have moved on to basketball by now. Funny how you guys love to see the Saints lose. I guess when you have never won a superbowl and making the playoffs is just a dream that is all you have to do. Saints own the south and will be the first team in history to host and play in the Superbowl. You can mark that down.

Edited by london67, 15 January 2012 - 09:43 PM.
Posted 15 January 2012 - 09:45 PM
Posted 15 January 2012 - 09:48 PM
Posted 15 January 2012 - 09:51 PM
The only reason it was a hit on the helmet is because the runner lowered his head into the line of the defender. The defender was moving into the body. The runner lowered his head to protect the ball, into the path of the defender. You can't then penalize the defender for an action of the offensive player.
Posted 15 January 2012 - 11:39 PM
That is all.:biggrinjester:
Posted 15 January 2012 - 11:48 PM
Posted 16 January 2012 - 12:40 AM
Not at the moment.That's Pierre Thomas right?
Posted 16 January 2012 - 01:35 AM
Posted 16 January 2012 - 01:38 AM
The best was how he walked away like a boss after the hit:
Posted 16 January 2012 - 06:40 AM
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users