What they really think
#1
Posted 15 April 2009 - 08:00 PM
#2
Posted 15 April 2009 - 08:04 PM
oh man we're really through the rabbit hole here
#3
Posted 15 April 2009 - 08:05 PM
#4
Posted 15 April 2009 - 08:10 PM
#5
Posted 15 April 2009 - 08:18 PM
#7
Posted 15 April 2009 - 08:43 PM
can you elaborate on which part is wrong and why you think it's not real journalism?
Well, I would think that her job is to report on the protest. Interview some folks without interjecting her own belief system...And evidently she is too retarded to understand that the money going back to that gentleman's state was indeed TAX money.
#8
Posted 16 April 2009 - 09:30 AM
lol.
#9
Posted 16 April 2009 - 09:43 AM
Granted, Congress can change this plan but the rumblings seem to be that they want to cut some his spending plans (like universal healthcare) and not increase taxes more.
I've got plenty of issues and concerns with our all Dem controlled gvt. on the federal and state level but people really need to educate themselves before protesting.
#10
Posted 16 April 2009 - 09:44 AM
I've got plenty of issues and concerns with our all Dem controlled gvt. on the federal and state level but people really need to educate themselves before protesting.
congrats murph you get it
#11
Posted 16 April 2009 - 09:52 AM
I'm not really sure what kind of substance these protests have. I'm referring to the basic principal behind their organization which is "no new taxes". Although Obama's budget is still in House comittees being revised, I've read it and for 98% of us making below 150K and 90% of us making between 150-250K (I'm talking about joint returns here), we will not see any income tax increases. Plus the estate (death) tax exemption is to stay at 3.5 million (it was only 650K ten years ago). Plus the tax increases for the wealthy are only going up to the Bill Clinton rates which is only 3-5% higher than now. And none of this is supposed to start until 2011.
Granted, Congress can change this plan but the rumblings seem to be that they want to cut some his spending plans (like universal healthcare) and not increase taxes more.
I've got plenty of issues and concerns with our all Dem controlled gvt. on the federal and state level but people really need to educate themselves before protesting.
But...But...But...Socialism!?!
#12
Posted 16 April 2009 - 10:26 AM
I'm not really sure what kind of substance these protests have. I'm referring to the basic principal behind their organization which is "no new taxes". Although Obama's budget is still in House comittees being revised, I've read it and for 98% of us making below 150K and 90% of us making between 150-250K (I'm talking about joint returns here), we will not see any income tax increases. Plus the estate (death) tax exemption is to stay at 3.5 million (it was only 650K ten years ago). Plus the tax increases for the wealthy are only going up to the Bill Clinton rates which is only 3-5% higher than now. And none of this is supposed to start until 2011.
Granted, Congress can change this plan but the rumblings seem to be that they want to cut some his spending plans (like universal healthcare) and not increase taxes more.
I've got plenty of issues and concerns with our all Dem controlled gvt. on the federal and state level but people really need to educate themselves before protesting.
Will your taxes increase or decrease when Obama/democrats allow the Bush tax cut to expire?
#13
Posted 16 April 2009 - 10:51 AM
Will your taxes increase or decrease when Obama/democrats allow the Bush tax cut to expire?
Captial Gains going from 15% to 20% would be the main negative impact on me and even that will not be too bad in my case. Congress is debating whether or not to keep it 15% for some making below 100k. Not sure what will happen with that.
#14
Posted 16 April 2009 - 11:04 AM
#15
Posted 16 April 2009 - 11:33 AM
According to the tax plans floated, I would pay maybe a bit less but not a lot as far as I can tell, and the majority of people would be in the same boat. Eventually taxes will have to go up I think, but raising them now would not be a good idea - they should have either been raised, or the "tax cuts" taken back, as soon as Bush saw the way the economy was going and how his spending was increasing - the economy would have been able to absorb it a little better then.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users






