Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Htar

What they really think

Recommended Posts

Fiz    878

you mean a rival news agency doesn't like a faux "protest" bankrolled by its biggest rival?

oh man we're really through the rabbit hole here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




rodeo    13,772

can you elaborate on which part is wrong and why you think it's not real journalism?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jangler    683

Well she didn't do a very good job other than take a shot at FOX. And BTW thanks for the 50b of our own money, so the state can piss it away.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Delhommey    2,796

The great think about conservatives in groups is you can really see the strong Christian background of so many of their rank. I mean, they really are such a testement to Christ's love.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Htar    0

can you elaborate on which part is wrong and why you think it's not real journalism?

Well, I would think that her job is to report on the protest. Interview some folks without interjecting her own belief system...And evidently she is too retarded to understand that the money going back to that gentleman's state was indeed TAX money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mmmbeans    443

I love it, we're in the middle of a media ratings war that because of the stupidity of both sides of our political spectrum has spread into a political war.

lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Murph    507

I'm not really sure what kind of substance these protests have. I'm referring to the basic principal behind their organization which is "no new taxes". Although Obama's budget is still in House comittees being revised, I've read it and for 98% of us making below 150K and 90% of us making between 150-250K (I'm talking about joint returns here), we will not see any income tax increases. Plus the estate (death) tax exemption is to stay at 3.5 million (it was only 650K ten years ago). Plus the tax increases for the wealthy are only going up to the Bill Clinton rates which is only 3-5% higher than now. And none of this is supposed to start until 2011.

Granted, Congress can change this plan but the rumblings seem to be that they want to cut some his spending plans (like universal healthcare) and not increase taxes more.

I've got plenty of issues and concerns with our all Dem controlled gvt. on the federal and state level but people really need to educate themselves before protesting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fiz    878

I've got plenty of issues and concerns with our all Dem controlled gvt. on the federal and state level but people really need to educate themselves before protesting.

congrats murph you get it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not really sure what kind of substance these protests have. I'm referring to the basic principal behind their organization which is "no new taxes". Although Obama's budget is still in House comittees being revised, I've read it and for 98% of us making below 150K and 90% of us making between 150-250K (I'm talking about joint returns here), we will not see any income tax increases. Plus the estate (death) tax exemption is to stay at 3.5 million (it was only 650K ten years ago). Plus the tax increases for the wealthy are only going up to the Bill Clinton rates which is only 3-5% higher than now. And none of this is supposed to start until 2011.

Granted, Congress can change this plan but the rumblings seem to be that they want to cut some his spending plans (like universal healthcare) and not increase taxes more.

I've got plenty of issues and concerns with our all Dem controlled gvt. on the federal and state level but people really need to educate themselves before protesting.

But...But...But...Socialism!?!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
g5jamz    1,111

I'm not really sure what kind of substance these protests have. I'm referring to the basic principal behind their organization which is "no new taxes". Although Obama's budget is still in House comittees being revised, I've read it and for 98% of us making below 150K and 90% of us making between 150-250K (I'm talking about joint returns here), we will not see any income tax increases. Plus the estate (death) tax exemption is to stay at 3.5 million (it was only 650K ten years ago). Plus the tax increases for the wealthy are only going up to the Bill Clinton rates which is only 3-5% higher than now. And none of this is supposed to start until 2011.

Granted, Congress can change this plan but the rumblings seem to be that they want to cut some his spending plans (like universal healthcare) and not increase taxes more.

I've got plenty of issues and concerns with our all Dem controlled gvt. on the federal and state level but people really need to educate themselves before protesting.

Will your taxes increase or decrease when Obama/democrats allow the Bush tax cut to expire?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Murph    507

Will your taxes increase or decrease when Obama/democrats allow the Bush tax cut to expire?

Captial Gains going from 15% to 20% would be the main negative impact on me and even that will not be too bad in my case. Congress is debating whether or not to keep it 15% for some making below 100k. Not sure what will happen with that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
natty    555

Well said Murph. We're witnessing the mob mentality that anyone of intelligence should be against.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
cookinwithgas    7,375

Cutting taxes while raising government spending to fight wars is stupid. Keeping the stupid tax cuts while raising spending to fix the economy would be stupider.

According to the tax plans floated, I would pay maybe a bit less but not a lot as far as I can tell, and the majority of people would be in the same boat. Eventually taxes will have to go up I think, but raising them now would not be a good idea - they should have either been raised, or the "tax cuts" taken back, as soon as Bush saw the way the economy was going and how his spending was increasing - the economy would have been able to absorb it a little better then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×