Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Fiz

The American military is really good at killing women and children

104 posts in this topic

i mean i know you're not smart at all g5 but you're comparing PhillyB asking me a vague hypothetical based on principles or morals or some higher code or something ludicrous like that to my article which criticizes the military strategy of the United States in an asymmetric war which uses civilian deaths as evidence.

can your puny little mind comprehend that difference? or are you so willing to jump into a argument with me from under someone's skirt that you didn't take the moment it would have required to fire up the neurons and see that you have NOTHING to add to the conversation and you don't understand it in the first place?

Why do liberals always resort to personal attacks and insults when being challenged? I mean, it's not just you, it's all of you. Not enough love from mommy? Too much from daddy? Help me out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i mean i know you're not smart at all g5 but you're comparing PhillyB asking me a vague hypothetical based on principles or morals or some higher code or something ludicrous like that to my article which criticizes the military strategy of the United States in an asymmetric war which uses civilian deaths as evidence.

can your puny little mind comprehend that difference? or are you so willing to jump into a argument with me from under someone's skirt that you didn't take the moment it would have required to fire up the neurons and see that you have NOTHING to add to the conversation and you don't understand it in the first place?

Look genius...he simply gave you a hypothetical to see what YOU feel the outcome should be. Your response:

im sorry nothing is black and white and i don't see the point of playing this game

and my response was simply that YOU made it black and white when you introduced the Iraq Body Count as a measure of how evil the military are...when you couldn't even respond to his question. IBC knows nothing of grey (not black/white) deaths.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Look genius...he simply gave you a hypothetical to see what YOU feel the outcome should be. Your response:

and my response was simply that YOU made it black and white when you introduced the Iraq Body Count as a measure of how evil the military are...when you couldn't even respond to his question. IBC knows nothing of grey (not black/white) deaths.

where did i ever say the american military was evil

i don't believe in such silly notions go back to the sandbox

Why do liberals always resort to personal attacks and insults when being challenged? I mean, it's not just you, it's all of you. Not enough love from mommy? Too much from daddy? Help me out.

Htar you're a barely functioning sped go play with keys

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i mean i know you're not smart at all g5 but you're comparing PhillyB asking me a vague hypothetical based on principles or morals or some higher code or something ludicrous like that to my article which criticizes the military strategy of the United States in an asymmetric war which uses civilian deaths as evidence.

can your puny little mind comprehend that difference? or are you so willing to jump into a argument with me from under someone's skirt that you didn't take the moment it would have required to fire up the neurons and see that you have NOTHING to add to the conversation and you don't understand it in the first place?

i haven't really checked out the main portion of this thread but i read the initial post. fiz, i highly encourage you to read COMISAF's recent "apology" for civilian deaths in afghanistan. hopefully you can decipher what's truly important out of his message.

keep in mind as you're reading it that this is a country that hasn't ever had a true census and the last census of any kind occurred in the 70's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

im sorry nothing is black and white and i don't see the point of playing this game.

That's because you'll automatically lose if you agree to play.

If you admit that there exists a scenario wherein the accidental death of an innocent is acceptable, outweighed by the necessity of military action which results in collteral damage, then your orginal post loses its moral high ground - as does, thus, your position, and you lose all your integrity in arguing it.

If you steadfastly insist that no, the risk of killing any innocent person is too irresponsible for any scale or reason of or for any military action, then you become a lunatic, as you've collectively decried U.S. military action in the Revolutionary War, Civil War, WWI and WWII. No sane being would attempt this.

On a less confrontational note, Fiz, I'm bringing these arguements not out of any 100% assuredness over my own position - I'm trying to determine where I stand. These are important issues and I think it's important to look at all sides of 'em. As in most cases, it would seem the answer here stands somewhere in the middle of the two extremes, no?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's because you'll automatically lose if you agree to play.

If you admit that there exists a scenario wherein the accidental death of an innocent is acceptable, outweighed by the necessity of military action which results in collteral damage, then your orginal post loses its moral high ground - as does, thus, your position, and you lose all your integrity in arguing it.

assuming i meant to establish a moral high ground and not an indictment of american military strategy in iraq

If you steadfastly insist that no, the risk of killing any innocent person is too irresponsible for any scale or reason of or for any military action, then you become a lunatic, as you've collectively decried U.S. military action in the Revolutionary War, Civil War, WWI and WWII. No sane being would attempt this.

um i would gladly argue against US military involvement in the Revolutionary War, Civil War, and WW1. I would also point out all the needless civilian deaths in WW2.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

assuming i meant to establish a moral high ground and not an indictment of american military strategy in iraq

um i would gladly argue against US military involvement in the Revolutionary War, Civil War, and WW1. I would also point out all the needless civilian deaths in WW2.

Artful dodge, but the indictment of U.S. military strategy in Iraq must be based on higher principle - which is what I'm trying to pinpoint, and what you're clearly dodging.

And the position stated earlier regarding arguing involvment in wars is really only contingent on the existence of one conflict which cannot be argued... given you've left out WWII on your list, which was on mine, the point stands.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites