Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

How will you vote on the gay marriage amendment?


  • Please log in to reply
211 replies to this topic

#1 Niner National

Niner National

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,540 posts

Posted 01 February 2012 - 09:23 AM

What I once thought was a vote guaranteed to deny gay marriage in NC may be a little more interesting now that Perdue has dropped out of the race. This will bring more Dems to the polls and less republicans may show up if Mitt has the nomination wrapped up by then.

How will you vote? For or against?

#2 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Moderators
  • 24,382 posts

Posted 01 February 2012 - 09:27 AM

I'll be voting for it. Same people voting against it would vote against interracial marriage 30 years ago.

NC could be the state that swings the South.

edit: The amendment is to ban gay marriage....so I will be voting against it.

Edited by Panthro, 01 February 2012 - 09:58 AM.


#3 Inimicus

Inimicus

    Life is better in a kayak

  • ALL-PRO
  • 6,265 posts

Posted 01 February 2012 - 09:39 AM

Ill be voting against the amendment.

#4 stirs

stirs

    I Reckon So

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,523 posts

Posted 01 February 2012 - 09:39 AM

Is the amendment banning or legalizing?

#5 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • ALL-PRO
  • 23,819 posts

Posted 01 February 2012 - 09:39 AM

There is no way in hell something like this should even be on a ballot in 2012, so I am sure it will pass here in North Carolina.

#6 stirs

stirs

    I Reckon So

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,523 posts

Posted 01 February 2012 - 09:40 AM

I'll be voting for it. Same people voting against it would vote against interracial marriage 30 years ago.

NC could be the state that swings the South.


Dont think it is that simple. Most rednecks would vote against both. More faith based votes would not care about the interracial thing since biblically, there is no issue.

#7 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,772 posts

Posted 01 February 2012 - 09:45 AM

It's already against NC state law, but I really don't care either way.

More than likely it will pass....and be codified in the NC state constitution. As far as generalizing what direction groups will vote, I'd be cautious about doing so. You'd be surprised what demographics change their normal voting patterns to make a decision on this.

http://latimesblogs....-african-a.html

When an initiative requires assumbed given voting blocs...it's dangerous when even 5% change.

#8 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Moderators
  • 24,382 posts

Posted 01 February 2012 - 09:54 AM

Dont think it is that simple. Most rednecks would vote against both. More faith based votes would not care about the interracial thing since biblically, there is no issue.

http://fox4kc.com/20...cial-marriages/

#9 Dpantherman

Dpantherman

    certified pee-on

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 26,475 posts

Posted 01 February 2012 - 09:55 AM

To be honest, I think its ridiculous that we have to vote on this stuff. I don't give a poo who anyone has sex with or marries.

#10 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Moderators
  • 24,382 posts

Posted 01 February 2012 - 09:56 AM

It's already against NC state law, but I really don't care either way.

More than likely it will pass....and be codified in the NC state constitution. As far as generalizing what direction groups will vote, I'd be cautious about doing so. You'd be surprised what demographics change their normal voting patterns to make a decision on this.

http://latimesblogs....-african-a.html

When an initiative requires assumbed given voting blocs...it's dangerous when even 5% change.


Bet that had more to do with religion than race.

#11 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,772 posts

Posted 01 February 2012 - 09:58 AM

Bet that had more to do with religion than race.


Maybe right, but I'm just pointing out that stereotypes (rednecks) shouldn't be the sole generalization made here.

#12 lightsout

lightsout

    Doin' stuff...thaaaangs

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,778 posts

Posted 01 February 2012 - 09:59 AM

Giving rights to people who should have had them all along? I'm for it.


As said earlier, the same people voting against it would have voted against interracial marriage. Or even against desegregation. It is the same principle. You think a certain group of people don't deserve the same rights as you because they're different in a certain way that they cannot change.

#13 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Moderators
  • 24,382 posts

Posted 01 February 2012 - 10:00 AM

Is the amendment banning or legalizing?


Banning it. Why the fug are we trying to ban it? What kind of wasted vote is this....fug backwards ass republicans.

#14 mmmbeans

mmmbeans

    FBI SURVEILLANCE VAN

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,005 posts

Posted 01 February 2012 - 10:00 AM

shouldn't be voting on civil rights.


this country's history of tyranny of the majority continues...

#15 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Moderators
  • 24,382 posts

Posted 01 February 2012 - 10:02 AM

Clarified the poll


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com