Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Obama proposes getting rid of some nukes, GOP goes ape shit

139 posts in this topic

Posted · Report post

He wants to save $10 [B]billion[/B] by reducing our nuclear arsenal from 1500 to 300. Is 300 nukes seriously not enough? The ability to destroy just about every human on the planet isn't enough security apparently.

"I just want to go on record as saying that there are many of us that are going to do everything we possibly can to make sure that this preposterous notion does not gain any real traction," said Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz.

[url]http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/15/obama-nuclear-weapons-cuts-house-gop_n_1279946.html[/url]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

lol @ the tags

whoever that republican apologist is should clarify a few things:

why are 300 nukes not enough?

why is 1 iranian nuke too many?
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

It's not about is it enough or too many....it's unnecessary unilateral disarmament. If there's one thing that's prevented anyone from pulling off an organized national ww2-esque fight, it's knowing that we'd send them back a few civilizations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

lol yeah I can just picture all those countries out there whispering "They only have 300 nukes, our time is now!"
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

As long as the Russians, Chinese etc... are making similar cuts, then I am ok with it.

And fwiw, there are a lot of democrats that would never go along with an 80% cut, because they know it would be ridiculous, and never get approved.

A 10-15% cut is more realistic, and I would be ok with that even without corresponding cuts in our potential opponents arsenal.

[URL="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/pushing-back-on-reports-of-nuke-cuts-dempsey-says-status-quo-of-deployed-weapons-an-option/2012/02/15/gIQAXmLoFR_story.html"]Panetta says 80% is only one option[/URL]

[QUOTE]Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told the committee that no decision has been made and maintaining the current level is one of the options.[/QUOTE]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Seems like it would be expensive to maintain just one nuke. Getting rid of 100 that are not needed in the slightest would save a ton of money. Seems like republicans should be all for cutting spending on things we don't need.

Oh wait, they only want to cut spending on the things they don't see as productive like healthcare. Weapons of mass destruction? Hell yeah, kill those dark people!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[quote name='Davidson Deac II']As long as the Russians, Chinese etc... are making similar cuts, then I am ok with it.
.[/QUOTE]

...which ain't happenin'. In fact, Russia is starting to rebuild itself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

The more I think about this, the more I believe this is merely a negotiating tactic by the administration. They throw out some outlandish number like 80% cuts in the overall arsenal, knowing there is no way it will pass the congress (even if the democrats were in control). That way, when the real figures come out (say 15-20%), they might be able to get some republicans onboard with it, enough to pass anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Obama certainly has listened to Charles Karass, but the problem is the moron should be doing this with our strategic "enemies"...not our own.

Unbelievable the gall and acceptance of all around that this will simply happen. It's like he's built a grand clone army....or disbanded one. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

If Obama really wants to help the yous and mes of the US, he'd outlaw those damn state auto inspections!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[quote name='Zod']Seems like it would be expensive to maintain just one nuke. Getting rid of 100 that are not needed in the slightest would save a ton of money. Seems like republicans should be all for cutting spending on things we don't need.

Oh wait, they only want to cut spending on the things they don't see as productive like healthcare. Weapons of mass destruction? Hell yeah, kill those dark people![/QUOTE]


The hypocrites come out of the woodwork with anything released from the White House.

If we launched 300 nukes we would ALL suffer, many more people would die, friend and foe, not just the country these ya-hoo's want to send back to the stone age. The world is much more connected than these idiots even realize.

A mass launch would doom the planet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[quote name='longtriad']If Obama really wants to help the yous and mes of the US, he'd outlaw those damn state auto inspections![/QUOTE]

That's a state issue (I'll be called looney like Ron Paul is for stating this). There have been proposals to end NC car inspections. Corruption causes them to continue. Fact is people make money from inspections.

[url]http://www.westerncarolinian.com/news/north-carolina-may-end-vehicle-inspections-1.305279[/url]

[url]http://hamptonroads.com/2011/03/nc-senators-want-end-yearly-car-inspections[/url]

[QUOTE]North Carolina is one of nearly 20 states that have either safety inspections or safety and emissions inspections. South Carolina is one of 15 states with no inspections.[/QUOTE]

As for nukes, sell them to Israel and Russia.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites