Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Rotoworld belives Brian Quick is top 50 talent


  • Please log in to reply
30 replies to this topic

#16 jungleking

jungleking

    Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 209 posts

Posted 26 February 2012 - 09:10 PM

Is this the dude that scored an 8 on the wonderlic?


Yes. Yes it is.

#17 ARSEN

ARSEN

    Banned

  • ALL-PRO
  • 12,726 posts

Posted 26 February 2012 - 10:10 PM

Quick is a tough sob. He will eat defenders up. He got a very good body control for his size, better than Hill. You can't teach that in NFL. He runs very smooth routes and not afraid of getting hit. Also, notice on this highlight video he double-covered 90% of the time. He was double covered the whole year and still came up with over 2,000 yards receiving.


Edited by ARSEN, 26 February 2012 - 10:15 PM.


#18 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Moderators
  • 24,322 posts

Posted 26 February 2012 - 10:15 PM

I don't want him just for the crappy song in his video

#19 ARSEN

ARSEN

    Banned

  • ALL-PRO
  • 12,726 posts

Posted 26 February 2012 - 10:25 PM

Oh yeah, Hakeem Nicks scored 11 on wonderlic test. I don't see Giants fans complaining about him.

#20 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Moderators
  • 24,322 posts

Posted 26 February 2012 - 10:31 PM

I once took a crap and went to wipe and there was nothing. I wiped again and still nothing. Sometimes weird poo happens

#21 ARSEN

ARSEN

    Banned

  • ALL-PRO
  • 12,726 posts

Posted 26 February 2012 - 10:42 PM

I once took a crap and went to wipe and there was nothing. I wiped again and still nothing. Sometimes weird poo happens


That's because u have not pooped in a while and ur stool became hardened. It happens...

Little bit of track here. :D

#22 Floppin

Floppin

    Smooches

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,733 posts
  • LocationShallotte, NC

Posted 29 February 2012 - 08:39 PM

Just wanted to say that Quick is going to be a beast for someone. I'd take him in the second, but realistically, for this team, we couldn't afford to take him before the 4th and he'll be gone by that time.

#23 Kevin Greene

Kevin Greene

    __YOU CAN'T FIRE ME!__

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,221 posts

Posted 29 February 2012 - 10:21 PM

Is this the dude that scored an 8 on the wonderlic?


yes




Posted Image

#24 MHS831

MHS831

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,168 posts

Posted 01 March 2012 - 12:18 AM

A lotta folks turn this off when they see WR because they are still stuck in Fox ball mode when 3 WRs was enough. Our WRs were on the field more than the rest of the division. THey run vertical routes. We need to rotate 4. Steve Smith will be 33, Gettis coming off injury--we could use a WR. Maybe not our biggest priority, and i think we will get one in the WR rich free agency because somebody will want to play with Cam.

And nobody knows how good Quick will be. I think he will be pretty good, but not for us. I see SF at the bottom of the second about as early as he will go. Just a guess.

#25 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,847 posts
  • LocationNonya

Posted 01 March 2012 - 12:49 AM

A lotta folks turn this off when they see WR because they are still stuck in Fox ball mode when 3 WRs was enough. Our WRs were on the field more than the rest of the division. THey run vertical routes. We need to rotate 4. Steve Smith will be 33, Gettis coming off injury--we could use a WR. Maybe not our biggest priority, and i think we will get one in the WR rich free agency because somebody will want to play with Cam.

And nobody knows how good Quick will be. I think he will be pretty good, but not for us. I see SF at the bottom of the second about as early as he will go. Just a guess.


We also use 2 TE that will get 80 rec between them. Add that to Lafell and Gettis who can get 40-50 each and the Rb gettting their catches. We have enough for a really good passing game. Stop getting all hung up on this WR poo.

#26 Herbert The Love Bug

Herbert The Love Bug

    Stripper Name: Bo Dangles

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,567 posts
  • Locationtied to your basement wall

Posted 01 March 2012 - 02:05 AM

I would take Stephen Hill. That is it. But not in the first or second. So I guess I would not end up with him.

#27 MHS831

MHS831

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,168 posts

Posted 01 March 2012 - 08:10 AM

We also use 2 TE that will get 80 rec between them. Add that to Lafell and Gettis who can get 40-50 each and the Rb gettting their catches. We have enough for a really good passing game. Stop getting all hung up on this WR poo.


Thanks for illustrating my point. I don't think your logic is sound. just because you proclaim the TEs to be adequate options, you miss the reason. Our 3 WRs were in the top 5 in the conference in snaps. We have a vertical offense, which causes our WRs to sprint about 30-40 yards on the average pass play. By the time Cam hits the fourth quarter, he has thrown 24-30 passes. There is no way we are running at 100% then. Look at the second half productivity. Our WRs were getting figured out for the most part. Fatigue is a factor during the game and toward the end of the season.

Besides, you seem confident that Steve Smith, a 5'9" speed WR will not hit the wall at 33. You seem confident that Gettis will be 100% and have progressed into a #2 WR. And everyone thinks that Lafell, with his mediocre (at best) numbers will be enough. You need to keep a WR or two in the development mode. They take time in each system.

I am not saying we need to draft a WR in the second--never have said that. However, to suggest that we are set at WR because we have TEs? Please.

Edited by MHS831, 01 March 2012 - 08:15 AM.


#28 section543

section543

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 282 posts

Posted 01 March 2012 - 08:15 AM

Is this the dude that scored an 8 on the wonderlic?


I believe he was valedictorian at App....... Maybe we could pay him with peanuts.

#29 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,847 posts
  • LocationNonya

Posted 01 March 2012 - 10:46 AM

Thanks for illustrating my point. I don't think your logic is sound. just because you proclaim the TEs to be adequate options, you miss the reason. Our 3 WRs were in the top 5 in the conference in snaps. We have a vertical offense, which causes our WRs to sprint about 30-40 yards on the average pass play. By the time Cam hits the fourth quarter, he has thrown 24-30 passes. There is no way we are running at 100% then. Look at the second half productivity. Our WRs were getting figured out for the most part. Fatigue is a factor during the game and toward the end of the season.

Besides, you seem confident that Steve Smith, a 5'9" speed WR will not hit the wall at 33. You seem confident that Gettis will be 100% and have progressed into a #2 WR. And everyone thinks that Lafell, with his mediocre (at best) numbers will be enough. You need to keep a WR or two in the development mode. They take time in each system.

I am not saying we need to draft a WR in the second--never have said that. However, to suggest that we are set at WR because we have TEs? Please.


Maybe if the defense had stop anybody or the offense didn't have to go 80 yards to score all the time . They wouldn't be figure out or Fatigue in the 2nd half.

This maybe just my opinion but this Offense having a full offseason and a defense that get s stops and short field for the offense will help more then drafting a wr in the 1st and 2nd round. Getting better play on Special teams will help as well.

We were the only top 5 offense with a rookie QB, Learning a new system, with no Offseason. We will be better on offense just with Cam having more exp. and rep in this offense.

#30 MtnJax

MtnJax

    Senior Member

  • ALL-PRO
  • 1,267 posts

Posted 01 March 2012 - 07:55 PM

If Brian Quick played for any other school besides App St (especially if it were UNC), you all would be beating off furiously over him


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com