Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

carolinarolls

Agreed

78 posts in this topic

It wasn't that 2010 Duke got a number one seed that pissed me off. It's that they got by far the easiest bracket when Kansas and Kentucky had separated themselves that year (much like Syracuse and Kentucky this year). Duke got an imploding Villanova team as its two, Baylor as its three and Purdue (which just lost Hummel) as its four. I mean come on. Somehow UK got stuck with West Virginia as its two. It didn't pass the smell test when they announced it, and sure enough Duke not only coasted through its region, but got a West Virginia team that hadn't hit threes all year but came in thinking they could because that's how they beat Kentucky.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And by got by you mean smashed? Carolina beat a weak mich st team in 09 whats your point. Ill check and see the rough road unc had to that championship.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And by got by you mean smashed? Carolina beat a weak mich st team in 09 whats your point. Ill check and see the rough road unc had to that championship.

No game within 12 points in the tournament that year. UNC was by far and away the #1 team in the country no doubt. To argue otherwise in 09 is absolutely retarded.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm im looking to see why unc didnt make a run to stop duke in 2010????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Duke played 2 close games in 2010 beating baylor in Texas and Butler in Indianapolis. Both were true road games and baylor was supposed to be Dukes undoing because they were so much more athletic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not blaming refs to clear it up. There are horrible calls in every game going both ways. There were some that aided in that comeback that were pretty terrible though (tough luck is all it is) and they were mentioned ad nauseum throughout he media reviews.

Facts are Facts.

Please don't jump to conclusions all the way to "another holoe fan blaming the..."

the comeback was short and furious as well as aided by some, how should I say, inoportune whiffs by the zebras. Then, the miracle shot for a one point victory.

There are no sour grapes here about the loss. We deserved to lose a game we dominated and gave away. It just happens that that game and the circumstances surrounding the loss seemed to fit right in to the rest of the article. Maybe that is why the author mentioned it as well.

As I said already, nobody came away from that game and could honestly state that the better team won without crossing their fingers behind their back. And the collective contests since then have done nothing to change that assessment.

This one should go a long way to prove that if in fact it is true. We will see.

Miracle shot Lulz, the guy hit 6 3's in the game, I could see if one of the Plumlee's hit a 3 it would be a miracle shot but there was nothing miracle about the shot that buried unc and ripped their hearts out of their chest by Rivers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It wasn't that 2010 Duke got a number one seed that pissed me off. It's that they got by far the easiest bracket when Kansas and Kentucky had separated themselves that year (much like Syracuse and Kentucky this year). Duke got an imploding Villanova team as its two, Baylor as its three and Purdue (which just lost Hummel) as its four. I mean come on. Somehow UK got stuck with West Virginia as its two. It didn't pass the smell test when they announced it, and sure enough Duke not only coasted through its region, but got a West Virginia team that hadn't hit threes all year but came in thinking they could because that's how they beat Kentucky.

Baylor was regarded as the toughest 3 seed in the tourney. And say all you want about Purdue, they were a sure fire 1 seed before the Hummel injury, and one player does not make a team. They were still a quality team, I think they deserved a higher seed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What made me so mad about the 2010 nit draw wasnt that unc was a four seed it was they got put in the easiest bracket. I mean Vt was the one seed. Did that seem fishy to anyone else? Oh snap even I see what I did there. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Baylor was regarded as the toughest 3 seed in the tourney. And say all you want about Purdue, they were a sure fire 1 seed before the Hummel injury, and one player does not make a team. They were still a quality team, I think they deserved a higher seed.

Duke should have been given West Virginia and Kentucky should have been given Villanova. Both Big East teams, easily interchangeable. West Virgnia had just won the Big East tournament. Villanova was imploding because of players not getting along. Sure enough, they didn't even make it to the Round of 16. Kentucky had two losses that year, both on the road and both very close.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It wasn't that 2010 Duke got a number one seed that pissed me off. It's that they got by far the easiest bracket when Kansas and Kentucky had separated themselves that year (much like Syracuse and Kentucky this year). Duke got an imploding Villanova team as its two, Baylor as its three and Purdue (which just lost Hummel) as its four. I mean come on. Somehow UK got stuck with West Virginia as its two. It didn't pass the smell test when they announced it, and sure enough Duke not only coasted through its region, but got a West Virginia team that hadn't hit threes all year but came in thinking they could because that's how they beat Kentucky.

Come on, people just don't do enough research, they hear something on ESPN or on sports talk radio and they run with it. If you actually break down the bracket for the 2010 tourney and look at RPI and the average for each #1 seed and their top 5 teams in their regions it breaks down like this: Kansas got the easiest region, the average RPI of the top 5 was 20. Cuse got the next easiest region with an RPI average of the top 5 that was 15. Duke was 3rd with an RPI average of the top 5 that was 12, and UK with the toughest with an RPI average of the top 5 being 11. So looking at this logically Kansas by far had the easiest road with Cuse being next and Duke and UK both having tougher roads then the other two #1 seeds. Duke had to beat Nova which was 3rd in the Big East which was the toughest and best conference all year, they beat the co-champs of the Big ten in Purdue, they beat a Baylor team that was 3rd in the Big 12, they beat WVU which won the Big East tourney, and finally beat the Horizon league champs that had won 25 games in a row.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites