Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Potential Draft Day Trade?


  • Please log in to reply
50 replies to this topic

#31 Kevin Greene

Kevin Greene

    __YOU CAN'T FIRE ME!__

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,834 posts

Posted 29 February 2012 - 12:13 AM

Can someone post the full draft value chart? I haven't been able to find it anywhere.



here ya go:

http://sports.espn.g...tory?id=2410670

#32 Dollar Store Dave

Dollar Store Dave

    Formerly Know As Ruff

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,482 posts

Posted 29 February 2012 - 12:14 AM

here ya go:

http://sports.espn.g...tory?id=2410670


pi + rep.

Thanks!

#33 Double34Trouble28

Double34Trouble28

    MEMBER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 957 posts

Posted 29 February 2012 - 12:18 AM

I think this is going to be one of the crazier draft days. Obviously, its important to keep in mind there are two months until the draft and obviously a lot will change depending on free agency. Something tells me there are going to be a number of trades and I just hope Marty has us coming out on the good end of it for once.

Personal opinion for sure, but I would do my best to trade back (for the right price) unless Claiborne fell to us. Outside of him there are far too many opinions from scouts as to how the next 10-15 players shake out.

#34 ed bell

ed bell

    Ruthless

  • ALL-PRO
  • 2,803 posts

Posted 29 February 2012 - 12:52 AM

Tannyhill in the mix changes everything for us. It's a good thing, no doubt.

#35 Riverboat Ron

Riverboat Ron

    The Gambler

  • ALL-PRO
  • 2,195 posts

Posted 29 February 2012 - 03:29 AM

Meh, I've been toying with the idea of a scenario like last year with 4 Qb's taken in the top 12, I'm just not sure the situation is quite the same. I think it will be tough for us to trade down, but who knows? Maybe Richardson falls to us and someone wants him badly enough to trade up. As for the Rams pick, some reports say they want three 1st rounders for the pick, no QB is worth that in my opinion. I think when it's all said and done, Washington will move up and take RGIII for only two 1st rounders and a couple extra picks.

#36 SuperLego5

SuperLego5

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 277 posts

Posted 29 February 2012 - 04:07 AM

I don't see why anybody would trade up with us for Tannehill. The Bills wont take a QB after giving Fitzpatrick that massive contract and the Chiefs wont take Tannehill over Cassell. The first team likely to take Tannehill is Seattle and even that isn't certain. Going by the value chart you're saving yourself a low 3rd/high 4th by trading with the Chiefs rather than us.

If Seattle don't take Tannehill then he will probably fall to the 2nd round, in which case any of the QB needy teams could trade back into the late 1st (likely with the Pats) for him. We probably offer the least value trade for Tannehill.

#37 Herbert The Love Bug

Herbert The Love Bug

    Stripper Name: Bo Dangles

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,567 posts
  • Locationtied to your basement wall

Posted 29 February 2012 - 06:18 AM

I wonder how many calls the Panthers got from teams wanting to move up to get Cam. RG3 better be good because some team is going to give up a crap load to get him.

#38 Kurb

Kurb

    I hit it.

  • Administrators
  • 13,609 posts
  • LocationILM

Posted 29 February 2012 - 07:12 AM

I wonder how many calls the Panthers got from teams wanting to move up to get Cam. RG3 better be good because some team is going to give up a crap load to get him.



I'm assuming 0.

Cam was no where near the polished player these 2 are being touted as.
+he had the pay2play scandal.
+the media was dragging his character through the mud.



Luckily for us all that made him into what he was this season and hopefully keeps him fired up.

#39 MadHatter

MadHatter

    The Only Voice of Reason

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,180 posts
  • LocationDark Side of the Moon

Posted 29 February 2012 - 07:16 AM

There's a headline on NFL.com that's really interesting right now.

- NFL

It seems that the Redskins have laid out that they're definitely willing to move up and grab RGIII. Well, we already knew that, didn't we? But, notice that it's St. Louis saying that Cleveland is also involved in the trade, now the Cleveland beat writers, while the Washington Post is saying that Washington is very interested.

This leads me to believe, along with some of the comments that RGIII doesn't really fit Pat Shurmur's West Coast offense as much as he does Shanahan's mobile-QB/Stretch offense, that the Browns may not be willing to deal that much for RGIII, instead, letting Washington take him.

Now, there have been reports that Miami is very interested in Matt Flynn, which leaves Cleveland still needing a QB. We all know that Cleveland wants a quality RB, and Trent Richardson is a guy that they could definitely take at 4. But, how will they get a QB? I think it's very possible that Cleveland could trade their 22nd pick and a 2nd or 3rd rounder to move up to the 9th spot, and take Ryan Tannehill. Reports are that Tannehill could amaze people at his Pro Day, and if he does, then I think this becomes more and more likely.


would not read into this that he fits the stretch offense rather than a WCO offense. It is more a fact that Washington is probalby iwlling the sell the farm and offer a richer deal....they have been known for going all in (even though it has seldom worked for them).

#40 cookinbrak

cookinbrak

    tastes like chicken...

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,399 posts

Posted 29 February 2012 - 07:20 AM

I wonder how many calls the Panthers got from teams wanting to move up to get Cam. RG3 better be good because some team is going to give up a crap load to get him.


Yeah, but that team will be Washington, so it'll be a'ight.

I think we could make out better trading down with someone, but I don't know who'd be there that would make teams jump. Maybe Reiff or Blackmon, and we would take them.

#41 Bj-Monster23

Bj-Monster23

    Slam Newton

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,255 posts
  • LocationRaleigh NC

Posted 29 February 2012 - 08:39 AM

Fletcher Cox, Jerel Worthy, Janoris Jenkins, Chandler Jones, and Zach Brown could all potentially be there.


You can take Jenkins off. Do not want.

#42 MWCarolina

MWCarolina

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,378 posts

Posted 29 February 2012 - 09:36 AM

Now, there have been reports that Miami is very interested in Matt Flynn, which leaves Cleveland still needing a QB.

honestly, i am predicting that Flynn ends up in Cleveland if they dont get RG3 and Miami gets Manning then Tannehill or Foles.

#43 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • ALL-PRO
  • 41,297 posts
  • LocationSC

Posted 01 March 2012 - 02:06 AM

Marty Hurney certainly loves to trade on draft day.

I don't put much stock into him trading up to go higher than 9, honestly, though I'll grant anything can happen.

Trading down in round one or up in round two, those things strike me as more likely based on history.

#44 Dollar Store Dave

Dollar Store Dave

    Formerly Know As Ruff

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,482 posts

Posted 02 March 2012 - 10:43 AM

Here's some recent reports coming out of Cleveland:

John Czarnecki of FoxSports.com reports the Browns have been showing “weird, uninterested signals” in the pick. Mike Freeman of CBSSports.com reports that Washington, Miami and Seattle have shown more interest in trading up for Robert Griffin III.

We’re not sure this means a lot at this point. Perhaps the Browns really would prefer to go after Matt Flynn in free agency. Or perhaps they just don’t want to show their intentions this early in the process, which makes a lot more sense.

- PFT

And as of today, there's this report:

“I was equally impressed with Ryan,” Shurmur said. “Very intelligent young man. Did a nice job in the interview. It’s important in the interview that they’re able to talk about what they did when we watch their film, and I thought he did a very nice job of that. He was very productive this year after being a receiver. He played receiver for 30 games and quarterback for 21. That’s not always easy to do.”

If the Browns are considering taking Tannehill with the fourth overall pick, then they’re a lot higher on him than anyone realizes. And if the Browns are a lot higher on Tannehill than anyone realizes, Shurmur probably wouldn’t be talking up the Browns’ interest.

- PFT

I think that it's definitely becoming more and more likely that we could trade that 9th pick and move down to 22nd.

#45 Dollar Store Dave

Dollar Store Dave

    Formerly Know As Ruff

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,482 posts

Posted 02 March 2012 - 10:48 AM

Also, the move would make sense out of why we're very interested in Janoris Jenkins. At 22nd, I'm sure he could still be there. The Cowboys are the other team that desperately need a CB, and they could easily take Dre Kirkpatrick at 14, leaving Janoris Jenkins to us at the end of the 1st.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com