Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

FDA to allow 17 year olds to get "morning after pill"


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
46 replies to this topic

#1 jkeough

jkeough

    poop

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,056 posts

Posted 23 April 2009 - 08:51 AM

http://news.yahoo.co...ning_after_pill


ok sound off religious right

#2 Delhommey

Delhommey

    Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 12,584 posts

Posted 23 April 2009 - 08:56 AM

And the crime rate will fall in 15-20 years.

Bank on it.

#3 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • ALL-PRO
  • 23,750 posts

Posted 23 April 2009 - 08:59 AM

Looks like Friday night high school prowls are BACK ON




17 year old chicks dig riding in my Mustang to the Sizzler parking lot

#4 Fiz

Fiz

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,063 posts

Posted 23 April 2009 - 08:59 AM

oh no we can't have 17 year olds having sex

#5 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,755 posts

Posted 23 April 2009 - 08:59 AM

With or without parental consent.

#6 mmmbeans

mmmbeans

    FBI SURVEILLANCE VAN

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,005 posts

Posted 23 April 2009 - 09:01 AM

With or without parental consent.


if parents were doing their jobs, it wouldn't be an issue.

#7 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • ALL-PRO
  • 23,750 posts

Posted 23 April 2009 - 09:01 AM

I remember the night my daddy gave me permission to have sex, don't you all?

#8 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,755 posts

Posted 23 April 2009 - 09:02 AM

if parents were doing their jobs, it wouldn't be an issue.


Doesn't matter. Who's legally responsible if something goes wrong? Can't be the parents...does the liability shift to the doctor, pharmacy, or school nurse?

#9 jkeough

jkeough

    poop

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,056 posts

Posted 23 April 2009 - 09:03 AM

Opponents, including prominent conservatives, counter that it would encourage promiscuity and might even become a tool for criminals running prostitution rings, as well as for sexual predators.


WTF!?!

#10 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • ALL-PRO
  • 23,750 posts

Posted 23 April 2009 - 09:07 AM

Doesn't matter. Who's legally responsible if something goes wrong? Can't be the parents...does the liability shift to the doctor, pharmacy, or school nurse?


This is one of the two or three valid points you have ever made on this board. The other two, I'm pretty sure, were questioning Zods sexuality.

#11 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,755 posts

Posted 23 April 2009 - 09:10 AM

This is one of the two or three valid points you have ever made on this board. The other two, I'm pretty sure, were questioning Zods sexuality.


Fiz...not Zod's. I guess I assume someone fixated on the TopCats would be hetero, but then again...he could be one of the Perez Hilton types.

BTW...my same issue with liability would pertain to abortion consent for minors.

I wonder how many in this very thread have daughters.

#12 goodlay

goodlay

    Moore than a backup

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 542 posts

Posted 23 April 2009 - 09:10 AM

You can\'t enforce the legality of having sex, so retarded.

#13 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • ALL-PRO
  • 23,750 posts

Posted 23 April 2009 - 09:16 AM

I have a 17 year old daughter, and if she felt the need to keep all this hidden from me, well, she's a big girl and can make a decision like that on her own. But I hope she would not.

#14 Fireball77

Fireball77

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,398 posts

Posted 23 April 2009 - 09:17 AM

if parents were doing their jobs, it wouldn't be an issue.

I agree 100%.
Problem is, kids aren't "raised" as much any more, they are "befriended".
Since fewer parents do their job now than used to do, I would prefer to see as few "unwanted" pregnancies as possible. I am really torn on it's being available to minors, but I would rather more people use BC than fewer. I don't get why there are more baby mommas and baby daddies than ever now though there is also much more freedom and availability and less stigma associated with getting BC at a young age. Heck, there's even less stigma with getting abortions than there was years ago. That's why I don't think it's a matter of "unwanted" with most of these pregnancies, it's a status thing or a lifestyle CHOICE. It involves the lives and the wallets of other people besides just the baby momma or daddy and that's a huge problem to me.

#15 Matt Foley

Matt Foley

    Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,983 posts

Posted 23 April 2009 - 09:55 AM

I remember the night my daddy gave me permission to have sex, don't you all?


No. I didn't know you then.


Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com