Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Good reading on "Bountygate"


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
33 replies to this topic

#31 breezing2anotherSB

breezing2anotherSB

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 29-December 11
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 206
  • Reputation: -50
HUDDLER

Posted 12 March 2012 - 10:34 PM

Ah but the Saints did cheat to gain an unfair advantage, and their leadership has admitted it.

Add in that Payton and Benson are so scared of what's going to happen that they're in New York begging for mercy (but probably won't get it).

But hey, maybe if you post that same article you quoted without attribution - which makes you a plagiarist by the way (look it up) - a dozen more times or so, maybe Roger Goodell will read it and take pity on the Saints.

That, or maybe all of us will just continue to sit here and laugh at you while you sit there all butthurt and pissed off trying to get back at us with all the effectiveness of a five-year-old throwing a tantrum.

I'd say option two is more likely :D


Yep an according to your logic you would say that me pasting an article is as bad as taking illegal banned substances.

#32 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 44,863
  • Reputation: 13,384
SUPPORTER

Posted 12 March 2012 - 10:39 PM

Yep an according to your logic you would say that me pasting an article is as bad as taking illegal banned substances.

Well, technically there's no law against not being very bright, being bad at forum trolling and getting laughed at by the people you're trying to upset, so I guess you've got nothing to worry about :thumbsup:

#33 Frizzy350

Frizzy350

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-January 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,417
  • Reputation: 594
HUDDLER

Posted 12 March 2012 - 10:39 PM

Yep an according to your logic you would say that me pasting an article is as bad as taking illegal banned substances.


nobody here is defending the players that were on our team who were taking banned substances.

mr scot has not been taking banned substances.
you have been plagiarizing material.

one of u is committing a crime.

#34 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 44,863
  • Reputation: 13,384
SUPPORTER

Posted 12 March 2012 - 10:41 PM

nobody here is defending the players that were on our team who were taking banned substances.

mr scot has not been taking banned substances.
you have been plagiarizing material.

one of u is committing a crime.

Metamucil is still on the approved list, right?

As long as that's true... :Angel_anim: