With Shockey Gone
Posted 14 March 2012 - 06:39 PM
Posted 14 March 2012 - 07:00 PM
Posted 14 March 2012 - 07:01 PM
Edited by Morph, 14 March 2012 - 07:16 PM.
Posted 14 March 2012 - 07:12 PM
Can't afford to do this.
That would give you Olsen, Shocket, Barnidge, and Hartsock....yes, Hartsock stays because of his play at H Back.
Can't afford to carry 4 TE's.
You can if you have a kicker that can punt . We'll see about that 1 though.
TE's are valuable on ST's though, I dont see the harm in 4 of them. Especially not in an offense that revolves around them.
Posted 14 March 2012 - 07:25 PM
Posted 14 March 2012 - 07:33 PM
Posted 14 March 2012 - 07:38 PM
Posted 14 March 2012 - 08:22 PM
Posted 15 March 2012 - 12:32 AM
There's that voice in the back of my head saying that maybe he looked good only because of the crap Tight Ends we'd had during the Fox years.
Posted 15 March 2012 - 06:38 AM
Shockey is a must re-sign! Not sure why we don't cut Ben Hartsock?
Because he is your blocking TE and FB. You need that on this team.
Posted 15 March 2012 - 06:40 AM
Since olsen and shockey were added to the roster last year our tight end play has been better than ever before. at least since wesley walls
Has more to do with the offense that we ran last year.
Don't get me wrong, I like Shockey. I woudl like to have him back....but not at $4M per season.
His stats last year were not world beater....they were average.
37 catches for 450 yards....4 TD's.