More dwill contract rant
#1
Posted 15 March 2012 - 11:43 AM
#2
Posted 15 March 2012 - 11:47 AM
Stewart has someone who can give him a rest when he isn't getting a rest as Cam dominates on the ground. We can at least boast about having invested more heavily in our ground attack than any team in the NFL. That makes us #1 at something....
#3
Posted 15 March 2012 - 11:48 AM
#4
Posted 15 March 2012 - 11:49 AM
I think williams is a good player, and I'm happy we resigned him especially to help our young qb. I think we probably paid him too much and wish we were in better cap shape. It's not the end of the world or anything. Be cool friend.
didn't look like Cam needed it...looked like Cam could of used some defensive help. A stud defender would of helped last year and would this upcoming year.
#5
Posted 15 March 2012 - 11:49 AM
#6
Posted 15 March 2012 - 11:49 AM
who cares if that money could of been used on a stud defensive player that could play almost all defensive snaps last year and this upcoming one.
Stewart has someone who can give him a rest when he isn't getting a rest as Cam dominates on the ground. We can at least boast about having invested more heavily in our ground attack than any team in the NFL. That makes us #1 at something....
You know, vince lombardi won four championships without ever once using sarcasm. He just yelled and shoved people.
#7
Posted 15 March 2012 - 11:51 AM
who cares if that money could of been used on a stud defensive player that could play almost all defensive snaps last year and this upcoming one.
Stewart has someone who can give him a rest when he isn't getting a rest as Cam dominates on the ground. We can at least boast about having invested more heavily in our ground attack than any team in the NFL. That makes us #1 at something....
Yeah, that's a nice strategy. Give your RB a breather by running your franchise QB more.
With all due respect, that is a horrible plan.
#8
Posted 15 March 2012 - 11:51 AM
#9
Posted 15 March 2012 - 11:53 AM
who cares if that money could of been used on a stud defensive player that could play almost all defensive snaps last year and this upcoming one.
Stewart has someone who can give him a rest when he isn't getting a rest as Cam dominates on the ground. We can at least boast about having invested more heavily in our ground attack than any team in the NFL. That makes us #1 at something....
This is a passing league now.
#10
Posted 15 March 2012 - 11:53 AM
#11
Posted 15 March 2012 - 11:54 AM
The Panthers reward players who have performed well for them in the past. They do not hire big name FA's who have no team loyalty and are selling there services to the highest bidder.
I love this about our front office. If you have serious problems with this, maybe you are following the wrong team and would be happier cheering for the Redskins or Eagles.
#12
Posted 15 March 2012 - 11:56 AM
Yeah, that's a nice strategy. Give your RB a breather by running your franchise QB more.
With all due respect, that is a horrible plan.
a horrible plan would be drafting a dual threat player at QB and unique matchup nightmare the league has never seen......and then not running him.
It sure wasn't horrible this year for us. You want Cam to take a step backwards then shrinking his role in our run game will surely do it.
Cam is part of our run game....not wanting him to be is just silly. Silly at this stage of his career.
#13
Posted 15 March 2012 - 11:57 AM
#14
Posted 15 March 2012 - 11:58 AM
didn't look like Cam needed it...looked like Cam could of used some defensive help. A stud defender would of helped last year and would this upcoming year.
Yeah, it didn't look like our rookie qb didn't need any help on offense after a shortened offseason which means our front office got a lot of things right. And one "stud" defender that we could have supposedly had for that money wouldn't have fixed that defense. Injuries made it a sieve.
#15
Posted 15 March 2012 - 12:00 PM
Same with Charles Johnson.
The entire age argument is bullcrap. He has never been THE #1 running back since he came in the NFL. I'm willing to bet he'll play and be able to contribute to a team until his mid-30s.
This isn't 1992 where you run your back into the ground in 3 years and his legs are dead.
Here's an example, Kevin Faulk vs. Larry Johnson. Who was more productive and consistent over the length of their career?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





