Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

D-Will or Stewart trade?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
126 replies to this topic

#25 capfolly

capfolly

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 635
  • Reputation: 92
HUDDLER

Posted 16 March 2012 - 11:06 PM

Stewart is the future. Heck I think he's better than Williams in this offense now. If they trade Stewart I'll be pissed.

#26 klumme

klumme

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 855
  • Reputation: 214
HUDDLER

Posted 16 March 2012 - 11:08 PM

Tolbert is looking to get paid like Sproles. With D-Wills contract and Stewart FA after the season we wont have them all back. So we could move Stewart now and get something for him know instead of nothing next year.

#27 megadeth078

megadeth078

    hate hate hate

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,067
  • Reputation: 683
HUDDLER

Posted 16 March 2012 - 11:17 PM

Tolbert is looking to get paid like Sproles. With D-Wills contract and Stewart FA after the season we wont have them all back. So we could move Stewart now and get something for him know instead of nothing next year.


Stewart is waiting patiently for his pay day. We would cut Dwill before trading Stewart. No amount of draft picks are worth getting rid of our running back of the future. We're not going to let him walk.

I didn't mean to thank you. :o

#28 mick eye

mick eye

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 06-March 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,047
  • Reputation: 4
HUDDLER

Posted 16 March 2012 - 11:18 PM

Dude, Stewart is our running back of the future. Dwill can get cut for all I care.


Enough said. Don't konw whyt i am typing. It is sacredlidgeaous to talk about trading one of "Double Troubel" But i would like to trade D-Will. Mentioned months ago that i kinda hoped Ol' Foxy wanted to reunite with him in Hile Migh City. Dwill's contract is likely very mngmt friendly, we have received a discount. 21 million guarateed is a small price to pay for what DeAngelo has done on the field. And most importantly what he can still do. Gauge the interest at least. Would love to move back into the top of the third. There is gonna be some guys hangingaround that would make an INSTANT IMPACKT. Whatever, Happy St. PAtricks weeknd.

#29 ed bell

ed bell

    Ruthless

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 3,111
  • Reputation: 831
SUPPORTER

Posted 16 March 2012 - 11:19 PM

Dude, Stewart is our running back of the future. Dwill can get cut for all I care.

Since when do we NEED to trade either one anyways? Am I missing something?

We don't need to trade either one...but why on earth would cutting D'Will make any sense whatsoever? I get it, some fans love Stewart and want D'Will sent out to pasture. The "30 year old RB's suck" reasoning is thrown out there all the time.

Funny things about the D'Will situation:

a) people expected him to get injured in 2011...he stayed healthy

.b )people expected him to get shown up by Stewart...they both did everything expected of them.

c) he's now in year two of his contract and is still 28 years old...re-structure him after 2012 and on we go.

#30 megadeth078

megadeth078

    hate hate hate

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,067
  • Reputation: 683
HUDDLER

Posted 16 March 2012 - 11:23 PM

talk about running yards all you want, I do think he was shown up by Stewart.

Stewart was in more snaps and a lot of plays would have to get removed from our playbook if we only had D-will.

Stewart is the only reason the screen pass made a return to Carolina.

#31 Pantherman

Pantherman

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 10-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,165
  • Reputation: 278
HUDDLER

Posted 16 March 2012 - 11:30 PM

I wheather see Dwill go. Stewart is to valueble to us.

#32 CollegePanther

CollegePanther

    President

  • Joined: 16-January 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,583
  • Reputation: 739
HUDDLER

Posted 16 March 2012 - 11:39 PM

I love Deangelo, but how much money we have invested in him would be much better used somewhere else. J-Stew and Mike Tolbert would be a strong backfield still

#33 jtnc

jtnc

    Resident Asshole

  • Joined: 28-November 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 13,662
  • Reputation: 3,664
HUDDLER

Posted 16 March 2012 - 11:43 PM

Or MAYBE we're gonna sign him and then release d-will?

#34 Ken

Ken

    Triple Threat

  • Joined: 20-December 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,913
  • Reputation: 964
HUDDLER

Posted 16 March 2012 - 11:45 PM

Bullshit, story is bullshit. -_-

#35 mick eye

mick eye

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 06-March 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,047
  • Reputation: 4
HUDDLER

Posted 16 March 2012 - 11:46 PM

My bad did not event mention Tolbert. I think a running attack of Cam, J-Stew and Yogi would be awesome. I say sign Mike !.!
Tolbert is similar to Stewart that he is a bigger back with receiving skills and ideal examples of Newton's Law. Snoop + Yogi. Add a shifty speed back with BETTER receiving skills and you got a KILLA RBC.

#36 AceMan

AceMan

    Huddle Vet

  • Joined: 09-November 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,857
  • Reputation: 278
HUDDLER

Posted 16 March 2012 - 11:56 PM

If we sign Tolbert, prepare for a possible HUGE s***storm...cuz we would definitely be getting rid of Stewart over D-Will