Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

Unc Vs Ohio


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
118 replies to this topic

#97 Herbert The Love Bug

Herbert The Love Bug

    Stripper Name: Bo Dangles

  • Joined: 04-August 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,567
  • Reputation: 2,313
HUDDLER

Posted 24 March 2012 - 01:07 AM

One can only wonder what this team could be like if everybody was clicking on all cylinders. I guess thats something that will be probably never happen. Hopefully come Sunday Kendall is atleast at 50 or 60 percent because I don't think I can bear to watch another game like that.


One can only wonder what we would look like if we had McDonald, Strickland, Marshall, a 100% Henson, and Barnes playing the way he is supposed to play. That would be a scary team. I was looking forward to seeing that team this year. That team would win the national title easily IMO.

#98 weyco2000

weyco2000

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 03-August 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,405
  • Reputation: 215
HUDDLER

Posted 24 March 2012 - 01:40 AM

Coming out of a timeout with 11:56 remaining and Ohio having scratched their way back within 39-38 in Friday night's regional semifinal, Reggie Bullock happened to take a look down at the Bobcats bench. What he saw surprised him.
"I saw one of their assistant coaches, and he told them, `They can't win this game without Kendall Marshall on the court,'" Bullock said.
http://www.tarheelbl.../032412aaa.html

#99 carolinarolls

carolinarolls

    Mel's brother Del

  • Joined: 03-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,459
  • Reputation: 451
HUDDLER

Posted 24 March 2012 - 08:11 AM

omg don't even let Barnes play overtime. Screw him. honest to God I wish he had gone to Duke.


**moron alert

#100 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 25,718
  • Reputation: 6,839
Moderators

Posted 24 March 2012 - 08:20 AM

Kansas by 10

#101 Montie_0123

Montie_0123

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 784
  • Reputation: 96
HUDDLER

Posted 24 March 2012 - 09:06 AM

One can only wonder what we would look like if we had McDonald, Strickland, Marshall, a 100% Henson, and Barnes playing the way he is supposed to play. That would be a scary team. I was looking forward to seeing that team this year. That team would win the national title easily IMO.


Yea if all of them would have been healthy that would have been a scary team to watch this year!

#102 Tarheel31

Tarheel31

    cynical pessimist

  • Joined: 21-July 11
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 645
  • Reputation: 49
HUDDLER

Posted 24 March 2012 - 09:19 AM

even w/o them, when the team was fired up after the Henson technical vs Creighton, they looked unbelievable.

If Marshall doesn't get knocked out of the Tourney I think they might have won every remaining game by 10+

#103 x djdrew x

x djdrew x

    Member

  • Joined: 29-July 11
  • posts: 299
  • Reputation: 84
SUPPORTER

Posted 24 March 2012 - 09:45 AM

regardless of how disorganized this team looks right now, barnes really has to step up and hit more than 1 jumper all game.

bullock has been coming on in the last few games in a major way....he is quickly becoming the defacto leader without marshall, while barnes is just....ehh... 'im really good, right guys?' ........something about that kid really rubs me the wrong way...so completely overrated.zeller and henson can only do so much....but if they never get the rock down low, they are just a waste of space on the court.

if we have a good gameplan we can hang with kansas but if we look like we did last night....oh boy, its gonna be 07 or whenever that disaster of a game was.... :(

#104 carolinarolls

carolinarolls

    Mel's brother Del

  • Joined: 03-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,459
  • Reputation: 451
HUDDLER

Posted 24 March 2012 - 10:36 AM

Kansas by 10


actually stayate only lost by three at full strength. it probably feels like 10 in rawlee though

#105 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 25,718
  • Reputation: 6,839
Moderators

Posted 24 March 2012 - 12:27 PM

It sucks that all those guys came back to win a championship and are going to fall short.

I'll take overachivers over underachievers anyday

#106 bleys

bleys

    Simple and Plain

  • Joined: 28-November 08
  • posts: 15,612
  • Reputation: 1,639
SUPPORTER

Posted 24 March 2012 - 01:28 PM

It sucks that all those guys came back to win a championship and are going to fall short.

I'll take overachivers over underachievers anyday


I would say the same if my team finally made it to the sweet 16 and try to spin it something positive...

#107 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 25,718
  • Reputation: 6,839
Moderators

Posted 24 March 2012 - 01:48 PM

Your team thats lol too

#108 Tarheel31

Tarheel31

    cynical pessimist

  • Joined: 21-July 11
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 645
  • Reputation: 49
HUDDLER

Posted 24 March 2012 - 03:43 PM

I'll take overachivers over underachievers anyday


Underacheivers?

McDonald didn't play a single game this year.
Stricklands last game was in mid January.
Now with Marshall on the shelf, they STILL made the elite 8.

They got freaking stillman white playing point ffs!

If you call that underachieving then I can't even imagine the knots in your kid's stomach on report card day!