Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Aside From Qb, What Positions Are Lowest In Priority?

carolina panthers

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
31 replies to this topic

#21 KillerKat

KillerKat

    To Hell With Bell

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 20,384
  • Reputation: 4,551
HUDDLER

Posted 30 March 2012 - 11:35 AM

Am I one of the only people on this board who believes we are set at DE??


nope..doesn't matter who the DEs are if all the QB has to do is step inside the pocket to avoid them because your DTs are getting man handled.

#22 L-TownCat

L-TownCat

    Baptized In The Blood Of Saints

  • Joined: 27-June 11
  • posts: 5,926
  • Reputation: 4,123
SUPPORTER

Posted 30 March 2012 - 11:49 AM

Am I one of the only people on this board who believes we are set at DE??


You are the only person in the realm of football that thinks a position of such importance is "set" with what we have.

#23 PhillyB

PhillyB

    sườn núi phía đông thứ ba của mặt trời

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 22,926
  • Reputation: 18,359
HUDDLER

Posted 30 March 2012 - 11:52 AM

there are plenty of positions we are technically fine at. there are also a whole lot of positions that we could stand to upgrade, even if by just a little bit.

that's part of the rebuilding process though.

#24 mountainpantherfan

mountainpantherfan

    In Honor of Sam Mills

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,907
  • Reputation: 5
HUDDLER

Posted 30 March 2012 - 12:25 PM

Are we talking starters or depth or both? This year or long term or both?

Reality is you can justify drafting any position for either depth or long term strategy. And teams are always only an injury away...

With Williams Stewart Tolbert and Goodson, RB is probably the closest to being a non-priority but contracts and fumbles are still concerns for 3 of those players.


#25 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,120
  • Reputation: 5,285
Moderators

Posted 30 March 2012 - 12:29 PM

Am I one of the only people on this board who believes we are set at DE??


Probably....Hardy is weak against the run and average as a pass rusher. That white kid made more noise than hardy.

CJ misses any time....potential worst DL in the league

#26 mountainpantherfan

mountainpantherfan

    In Honor of Sam Mills

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,907
  • Reputation: 5
HUDDLER

Posted 30 March 2012 - 12:32 PM

I take that back. Center is a non-priority with Kalil starting and Hangartner as backup and both under contract.

#27 Herbert The Love Bug

Herbert The Love Bug

    Stripper Name: Bo Dangles

  • Joined: 04-August 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,567
  • Reputation: 2,312
HUDDLER

Posted 30 March 2012 - 02:46 PM

we could use improvements at almost every position so I'm not going to start listing

#28 stirs

stirs

    I Reckon So

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,070
  • Reputation: 1,993
HUDDLER

Posted 30 March 2012 - 05:49 PM

Center, RB,FB,
um....


What else?


That is it, unless we trade Stew then pick up a scat back

#29 carpanfan96

carpanfan96

    play hard, hit harder

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • posts: 11,995
  • Reputation: 962
SUPPORTER

Posted 30 March 2012 - 07:06 PM

I think you listed the only three positions that are absolutely set in stone.

I could see the team drafting a DT, DE, WR, TE, CB, LB or G.

The team needs depth and insurance at LB, CB and G
The team needs competition at the #2 WR spot and a backup TE
The team some starting caliber players on the DL (Johnson the only one on the team right now)

#30 KendrickPanther

KendrickPanther

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 21-March 12
  • posts: 8,985
  • Reputation: 4,851
SUPPORTER

Posted 30 March 2012 - 08:53 PM

I don't think we are "set" at guard. But I do think we are better off plugging in cheap guys under contract rather than pursue someone in draft or free agency.