Wide Receiver
#16
Posted 01 April 2012 - 06:57 PM
If we manage to improve our defense this year, I do envision us taking a WR with the 1st pick next year.
I think we draft a WR this draft but more for PR/KR.
On Braylon, I would be happy if he came for a 1 yr minimum high incentive contract.
#17
Posted 01 April 2012 - 07:09 PM
#18
Posted 01 April 2012 - 07:10 PM
I think there's a possibility for Wright but we have huge needs on Defense.
Best chance is signing Braylon when we clear Wharton's cap in June I think. Braylon had his best season with Chud so there's some connection there.
#19
Posted 01 April 2012 - 07:12 PM
I don't know about that.. Edwards wasn't on the field much last year. You can't really compare them.
from 08-2010 Edwards has like a 14% drop rate, I think we ranked in the low 40's, should have clarified my point a little more...
Lafell had a bad 2010 drop rate around 11% and this past year under 6%, so I would say he has improved on his second year, and Edwards has had 14% between 08-10, he didn't really play in 2011....
#20
Posted 01 April 2012 - 07:17 PM
#21
Posted 01 April 2012 - 07:23 PM
#22
Posted 01 April 2012 - 07:51 PM
from 08-2010 Edwards has like a 14% drop rate, I think we ranked in the low 40's, should have clarified my point a little more...
Lafell had a bad 2010 drop rate around 11% and this past year under 6%, so I would say he has improved on his second year, and Edwards has had 14% between 08-10, he didn't really play in 2011....
You know what Smiths was? 17% percent. Doesn't mean he's a bad wide out...
#23
Posted 01 April 2012 - 08:08 PM
You know what Smiths was? 17% percent. Doesn't mean he's a bad wide out...
Yeah I agree, but I just think bringing in vets will limit the progression of our young talent when it comes to the WR position, especially when we have some many holes on DEF, the GM has to use the remaining money wisely, IMO and bringing in a VET WR, I feel goes against that philosophy.
#24
Posted 01 April 2012 - 08:19 PM
Yeah I agree, but I just think bringing in vets will limit the progression of our young talent when it comes to the WR position, especially when we have some many holes on DEF, the GM has to use the remaining money wisely, IMO and bringing in a VET WR, I feel goes against that philosophy.
I can get a handle on your view on this subject and agree to an extent. It still wouldn't hurt taking a look at Edwards, especially if he comes for cheap. He's honestly the only wide out I'd want to consider in the FA market right now, just because he has familiarity with the system that Chudz has implemented.
#25
Posted 01 April 2012 - 08:32 PM
A veteran player like Edwards could relieve Smitty but it has not been done since Moose. It seems you need to have someone just as passionate as Smitty, or it does not work. Not selfish but crazy to get along on the field. TE Shockey has passion and it worked. Keyshawn was selfish and it failed bad.
Perhaps Chad Johnson? he has personal history and has passion. He would get along with Smitty and help Cam.
If we pick up a wide receiver in the draft, he needs to be very comfortable in his abilities. Hence, a high pick rather a late one in the draft.
Jarrett, Colbert, dude from OSU that the raiders picked up a few years back all were later picks that did not work opposite Smitty.
#26
Posted 01 April 2012 - 08:36 PM
I don't see a great need for us to get a WR this yeaar, unless he's a return man. We have other areas that are more important that needs to be addressed first.Don't get me wrong, he definitely showed flashes... But for example, in Houston, he was targeted a multitude of times and failed to come up with a single catch. And if you can't get ahead of Naanee except when he gets injured, I'm not impressed.
#27
Posted 01 April 2012 - 08:46 PM
Rivera is making a concerted effort to upgrade the special teams and adding a KO/P returner is more valuable IMO. If he happens to be a WR, so be it.
#28
Posted 01 April 2012 - 08:50 PM
#29
Posted 01 April 2012 - 08:54 PM
#30
Posted 01 April 2012 - 08:55 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





