Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

HeatCheck

Hypothetical Trade

   66 members have voted

  1. 1. How willing would you pursue a trade like this?

    • Very Willing
      26
    • Somewhat Willing
      15
    • Unsure
      6
    • Not too willing
      11
    • Not willing at all
      8

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

33 posts in this topic

Then throw in a fourth not the second. Look at the Falcons trade last year

Yeah but the Browns received a first and a second, not two firsts.

That's not the greatest to compare it to because it's not a similar situation as ours and Falcons went all out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes!

Could possibly get a Jenkins and Worthy.

And a lb in the third.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Then throw in a fourth not the second. Look at the Falcons trade last year

If it's next years 1st a team would be willing I'm sure. If it's the bengals and two current 1sts I doubt they would do that. Pats would I'm sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah but the Browns received a first and a second, not two firsts.

That's not the greatest to compare it to because it's not a similar situation as ours and Falcons went all out.

Atlanta did give up 2 1st. Their total was 2 1st and 3rd and 2 4ths

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/thehuddle/post/2011/04/falcons-trade-up-21-spots-to-choose-wr-julio-jones/1#.T33VUPBSQgo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i wouldn't give up our 2nd, but i wouldn't mind trading down to the Pats for their 2 late 1st round picks, the draft value chart has it about even...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let me get this straight, we'd lose our first for 2 seconds? If so, hell no.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I might be willing to go for it, depending on if someone really valuable falls. If Claiborne was there at 9 I would take him instead.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since were obviously in the land of make believe. Sure Why Not?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let me get this straight, we'd lose our first for 2 seconds? If so, hell no.

No, I'm not that stupid.

We'd lose our 1st (9) and our 2nd

and

We'd gain 2 lower firsts (e.g. 17 & 21) and a third.

The reason I pose this question is because I feel like there's a lot more value in 2 mid/lower first rounders vs who is going to be available at 9. But if you feel like losing a 2nd is too much just to pick up two first rounders than I would understand. This poll isn't meant to see if you think it's fair or not, because this is most certainly a realistic trade. It's more to judge the value of the trade and how comfortable you'd be selecting at these spots considering where players should fall.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This feels like one of those personality tests you have to do for job applications

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites