Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Hypothetical Trade

   66 votes

  1. 1. How willing would you pursue a trade like this?

    • Very Willing
      26
    • Somewhat Willing
      15
    • Unsure
      6
    • Not too willing
      11
    • Not willing at all
      8

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

33 posts in this topic

Posted

i wouldn't give up our 2nd, but i wouldn't mind trading down to the Pats for their 2 late 1st round picks, the draft value chart has it about even...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Let me get this straight, we'd lose our first for 2 seconds? If so, hell no.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I might be willing to go for it, depending on if someone really valuable falls. If Claiborne was there at 9 I would take him instead.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Since were obviously in the land of make believe. Sure Why Not?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Let me get this straight, we'd lose our first for 2 seconds? If so, hell no.

No, I'm not that stupid.

We'd lose our 1st (9) and our 2nd

and

We'd gain 2 lower firsts (e.g. 17 & 21) and a third.

The reason I pose this question is because I feel like there's a lot more value in 2 mid/lower first rounders vs who is going to be available at 9. But if you feel like losing a 2nd is too much just to pick up two first rounders than I would understand. This poll isn't meant to see if you think it's fair or not, because this is most certainly a realistic trade. It's more to judge the value of the trade and how comfortable you'd be selecting at these spots considering where players should fall.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

This feels like one of those personality tests you have to do for job applications

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Clearly, but use your best judgement based on what players are going to be there. I think many would pass on this if Claiborne was there. But I think in any other situation I'd trade down, that's just me though.

If we are getting the Patriots #27 and #31, then No, I would pass on the trade.

If we are getting the Browns two 1st's then I would be all over it.

It completely depends on the picks we trade for..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

No, I'm not that stupid.

We'd lose our 1st (9) and our 2nd

and

We'd gain 2 lower firsts (e.g. 17 & 21) and a third.

The reason I pose this question is because I feel like there's a lot more value in 2 mid/lower first rounders vs who is going to be available at 9. But if you feel like losing a 2nd is too much just to pick up two first rounders than I would understand. This poll isn't meant to see if you think it's fair or not, because this is most certainly a realistic trade. It's more to judge the value of the trade and how comfortable you'd be selecting at these spots considering where players should fall.

Thanks for the clarification.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I wouldn't do this because our high second rounder is almost as good as a first. there is going to be very little drop off in talent between say picks 25-40.

only way i would do this is if we got this deal from the bengals for #17 and #21. could pick jenkins/kirkpatrick and one of high ceiling DTs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites