Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Draft Rumor: Jets Might Want To Move Up Into The Top Ten For Ingram


  • Please log in to reply
66 replies to this topic

#46 bigdog10

bigdog10

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,265 posts

Posted 09 April 2012 - 02:25 PM

Beason + Kalil > Revis


Wasn't arguing that fact. Would much rather have the two we got than one corner.

However, it doesn't negate the fact that the Jets came out pretty good on that deal as well.

#47 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Moderators
  • 23,505 posts

Posted 09 April 2012 - 02:28 PM

So we should remind them of that when we start talking

#48 Ivan The Awesome

Ivan The Awesome

    That wasn't a Penalty.

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,648 posts
  • LocationNC

Posted 09 April 2012 - 02:31 PM

The question is, will Ingram be there at #9?

#49 Frash Brastard

Frash Brastard

    The Frashmaker

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,778 posts

Posted 09 April 2012 - 02:31 PM

In honesty though, the 2007 draft was deep in talent overall, except at the qb position. Harder to miss on players

It was just as good as the 2009 draft was terrible

#50 Gallagher

Gallagher

    Never Doubt Davis

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,244 posts
  • LocationLos Angeles, CA

Posted 09 April 2012 - 02:33 PM

Beason + Kalil > Revis

Pshhhh, Beason>Revis.

#51 pOpCoRnPoPpEr

pOpCoRnPoPpEr

    HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,940 posts
  • LocationPrison

Posted 09 April 2012 - 02:35 PM

Lol ask a Jets fan and you'll get the opposite.

#52 pOpCoRnPoPpEr

pOpCoRnPoPpEr

    HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,940 posts
  • LocationPrison

Posted 09 April 2012 - 02:35 PM

The question is, will Ingram be there at #9?


Doubt it

#53 AceMan

AceMan

    Huddle Vet

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,657 posts

Posted 09 April 2012 - 02:39 PM

Pshhhh, Beason>Revis.


http://objection.mrd...o.php?n=5682944

Don't be that guy...

#54 sml1950

sml1950

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 382 posts

Posted 09 April 2012 - 03:59 PM

Everyone on this thread may be surprises when we take Ingram @9 and KEEP him. He is the most versatile player in the draft and that's what Rivera is looking for. He can play the 7,9 and even 3 technique on 3rd downs, and drop into coverage when we blitz LBs. He can also play OLB and cover TEs. If he's there @9, I'd definitely take him.

#55 Jesse

Jesse

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,260 posts
  • LocationVirginia

Posted 09 April 2012 - 04:04 PM

Everyone on this thread may be surprises when we take Ingram @9 and KEEP him. He is the most versatile player in the draft and that's what Rivera is looking for. He can play the 7,9 and even 3 technique on 3rd downs, and drop into coverage when we blitz LBs. He can also play OLB and cover TEs. If he's there @9, I'd definitely take him.

If Rivera announced we'd be moving to a 3-4 then yes.

#56 Gallagher

Gallagher

    Never Doubt Davis

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,244 posts
  • LocationLos Angeles, CA

Posted 09 April 2012 - 04:05 PM

http://objection.mrd...o.php?n=5682944

Don't be that guy...


http://objection.mrd...o.php?n=5683066

#57 Pantherman

Pantherman

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,081 posts

Posted 09 April 2012 - 06:13 PM

This is what I think will happen:

1 - Luck
2 - RGIII
3 - Kalil
4 - Blackmon
5 - Richardson
6 - Claiborne
7 - Floyd
8 - Tennahill

Well that is what you think might happen I think something else could happen. But it is all prediction until the draft begins. A few of these players you picked in the top 8 could fall past 8. Anything could happen in the NFL draft. It all depends on the teams and their needs at the momet. Things don't always go according to what people think will happen. It is a wait and see game right now until draft day.

#58 Donald LaFell

Donald LaFell

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,729 posts

Posted 09 April 2012 - 06:34 PM

If Rivera announced we'd be moving to a 3-4 then yes.


3-4 and 4-3 I doubt it matters that much. Good players are good players. When you're getting picked #9 you'll make for a solid linebacker no matter what the system is.

#59 La Pantera

La Pantera

    humpin' habanero

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,551 posts

Posted 09 April 2012 - 06:36 PM

What's up with the " Ingram can only be a 3-4 lb" talk???

Because of his size? Well lets take a look at the DEs on the Panthers roster

Greg Hardy- 6'4" 276 lb

Antwan Applewhite- 6'3" 258 lb

Thomas Keiser- 6'3" 261 lb

Jyles Tucker-6'3" 258 lb

Charles Johnson 6'2" 275 lb.

Eric Norwood 6'1" 241 lb

Doesn't look like size is much of an issue

#60 Actionman0z

Actionman0z

    Strong Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,785 posts

Posted 09 April 2012 - 06:39 PM

Everyone on this thread may be surprises when we take Ingram @9 and KEEP him. He is the most versatile player in the draft and that's what Rivera is looking for. He can play the 7,9 and even 3 technique on 3rd downs, and drop into coverage when we blitz LBs. He can also play OLB and cover TEs. If he's there @9, I'd definitely take him.


Yes, he can play it like a Raptor.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com - IP Content Design by Joshua Tree / TitansReport.