Marty Hurney Apparently Lied About Fletcher Cox
#106
Posted 16 April 2012 - 01:23 PM
#107
Posted 16 April 2012 - 01:26 PM
#108
Posted 16 April 2012 - 01:29 PM
I know I'm late to the party but just wanted to say, I love Cox too!!
No need to tell us. You can spot most Cox lovers pretty easily.
#109
Posted 16 April 2012 - 01:34 PM
Thyats the same thing they told me in prison.
To bad they didn't teach you to spell.
#110
Posted 16 April 2012 - 01:45 PM
#111
Posted 16 April 2012 - 01:51 PM
Cox had 5 sacks last year and 4 of those were in 2 games. (South Carolina and Kentucky) and 1 against Wake Forest. The other 9 games he had none. Add that he had a total of 3 quarterback hurries and you see a guy who pressured or got to the quarterback a total of 8 times in 12 games. Hardly the terrific pass rusher people are making him out to be.
Funny that Coples had 7.5 sacks and he is considered lazy and unmotivated but Cox has 5 and he has a high motor and never quits.
When you look at all our choices you get the sense that there is not that much to choose from really. Ingram brings the most to the table and by many accounts will be gone when we pick at 9.
#112
Posted 16 April 2012 - 01:53 PM
That was horrible DT draft. Luis Castillo was the next best one and he wasn't picked until 28. Only 3 were pick in the whole 1st round. There is no way you are comparing that the 2005 class to this one are you.
You can not base talent on where a player is picked. I randomly picked 2005 because it gives enough time to find players who turned out to be busts. Cody and Babineaux were both better than Johnson and Castillo but this isn't what the draft experts said before the draft.
#113
Posted 16 April 2012 - 01:59 PM
#114
Posted 16 April 2012 - 02:18 PM
#115
Posted 16 April 2012 - 02:41 PM
#116
Posted 16 April 2012 - 02:45 PM
What's wrong with a little Cox guys? I mean Cox, Sacks, penetration, Come on guys..He will penetrate deep, isn't that what we want?
I would do all of the above to Ms. Dehar.
#117
Posted 16 April 2012 - 02:48 PM
What's wrong with a little Cox guys? I mean Cox, Sacks, penetration, Come on guys..He will penetrate deep, isn't that what we want?
Woa not the kind of Cox I want on my team.
#118
Posted 16 April 2012 - 03:02 PM
#119
Posted 16 April 2012 - 03:06 PM
Premier edge rusher to help Johnson would be nice. Hardy is good but is he elite?
If we want a premier edge rusher then Cox would not be the guy at all.
#120
Posted 16 April 2012 - 03:14 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





