Jump to content


Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

Marty Hurney Apparently Lied About Fletcher Cox


  • Please log in to reply
244 replies to this topic

#106 Peppers90 NC

Peppers90 NC

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,571 posts

Posted 16 April 2012 - 01:23 PM

he added to his credibility by giving bullshit to the Whackattack show.

#107 Herbert The Love Bug

Herbert The Love Bug

    Stripper Name: Bo Dangles

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,567 posts
  • Locationtied to your basement wall

Posted 16 April 2012 - 01:26 PM

I know I'm late to the party but just wanted to say, I love Cox too!!

#108 DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

    Senior Member

  • Moderators
  • 24,967 posts

Posted 16 April 2012 - 01:29 PM

I know I'm late to the party but just wanted to say, I love Cox too!!


No need to tell us. You can spot most Cox lovers pretty easily.

#109 PantherFanOne

PantherFanOne

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,779 posts
  • LocationRock Hill S.C.

Posted 16 April 2012 - 01:34 PM

Thyats the same thing they told me in prison. :(


To bad they didn't teach you to spell. :)

#110 cultclassiccat

cultclassiccat

    flash

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,515 posts
  • LocationG spot

Posted 16 April 2012 - 01:45 PM

Cox in our box would be kinda tight. Im licking it...i mean LIKING it.

#111 panthers55

panthers55

    Starting all over again

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,667 posts
  • LocationAt the lake

Posted 16 April 2012 - 01:51 PM

If they pick Cox, then they are admitting that Rivera and Hurney blew it with McClain last year. You don't draft a guy at the 65th pick in the draft and then redraft another the next year unless you have a situation like we did with Clausen. Even then Newton was the number 1 pick in the draft and had huge upside. Cox really doesn't. Now if we had a chance to draft a Suh which is the DT version of Newton, then you do it in a heartbeat. I can't see where Cox provides so much more than a guy we can get in the second round. It we want pass rush both Ingram and Coples bring more to the table by far. At least with Williams and Stewart they waiting 2 years.

Cox had 5 sacks last year and 4 of those were in 2 games. (South Carolina and Kentucky) and 1 against Wake Forest. The other 9 games he had none. Add that he had a total of 3 quarterback hurries and you see a guy who pressured or got to the quarterback a total of 8 times in 12 games. Hardly the terrific pass rusher people are making him out to be.

Funny that Coples had 7.5 sacks and he is considered lazy and unmotivated but Cox has 5 and he has a high motor and never quits.

When you look at all our choices you get the sense that there is not that much to choose from really. Ingram brings the most to the table and by many accounts will be gone when we pick at 9.

#112 NCstoner420

NCstoner420

    Dave's not here man

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,386 posts

Posted 16 April 2012 - 01:53 PM

That was horrible DT draft. Luis Castillo was the next best one and he wasn't picked until 28. Only 3 were pick in the whole 1st round. There is no way you are comparing that the 2005 class to this one are you.


You can not base talent on where a player is picked. I randomly picked 2005 because it gives enough time to find players who turned out to be busts. Cody and Babineaux were both better than Johnson and Castillo but this isn't what the draft experts said before the draft.

#113 Ivan The Awesome

Ivan The Awesome

    That wasn't a Penalty.

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,812 posts
  • LocationNC

Posted 16 April 2012 - 01:59 PM

What's wrong with a little Cox guys? I mean Cox, Sacks, penetration, Come on guys..He will penetrate deep, isn't that what we want?

#114 Riverboat Ron

Riverboat Ron

    The Gambler

  • ALL-PRO
  • 2,119 posts

Posted 16 April 2012 - 02:18 PM

It's looking more and more like Cox will be our pick. To be honest I'd be happy with Ingram, Coples or Cox at #9 and maybe Brockers if we trade down.

#115 KendrickPanther

KendrickPanther

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,976 posts

Posted 16 April 2012 - 02:41 PM

There's no way I'm watching 10 minutes of nothing but Cox on youtube. Just tell me one thing, is he stiff or fluid?

#116 ZeroZeroSeven

ZeroZeroSeven

    MEMBER

  • ALL-PRO
  • 234 posts

Posted 16 April 2012 - 02:45 PM

What's wrong with a little Cox guys? I mean Cox, Sacks, penetration, Come on guys..He will penetrate deep, isn't that what we want?


I would do all of the above to Ms. Dehar.

#117 KendrickPanther

KendrickPanther

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,976 posts

Posted 16 April 2012 - 02:48 PM

What's wrong with a little Cox guys? I mean Cox, Sacks, penetration, Come on guys..He will penetrate deep, isn't that what we want?


Woa not the kind of Cox I want on my team.

#118 cultclassiccat

cultclassiccat

    flash

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,515 posts
  • LocationG spot

Posted 16 April 2012 - 03:02 PM

Premier edge rusher to help Johnson would be nice. Hardy is good but is he elite?

#119 panthers55

panthers55

    Starting all over again

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,667 posts
  • LocationAt the lake

Posted 16 April 2012 - 03:06 PM

Premier edge rusher to help Johnson would be nice. Hardy is good but is he elite?


If we want a premier edge rusher then Cox would not be the guy at all.

#120 CarolinaPanthers8789

CarolinaPanthers8789

    Alexander SEMIN!!! FTW

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,669 posts
  • LocationNorth Carolina/Virginia

Posted 16 April 2012 - 03:14 PM

This thread is starting to get a little uncomfortable.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com