Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Is This Man A Terrorist?


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 cantrell

cantrell

    secular progressive bogeyman

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,447 posts

Posted 20 April 2012 - 10:02 PM

http://www.salon.com...a_terrorist/?=5

well it's going to depend on just how white and conservative he is so let's take a look and see...

Posted Image

nope, turns out he's just a true patriot lone wolf fighting for freedoms or something because he sure isn't facing domestic terrorism charges after attempting to burn down a planned parenthood

#2 mav1234

mav1234

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,633 posts

Posted 20 April 2012 - 10:11 PM

he was uh, standing ground in the name of the fetuses or something.

#3 Floppin

Floppin

    Smooches

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,712 posts
  • LocationShallotte, NC

Posted 20 April 2012 - 10:19 PM

Only brown people are terrorists, duh.

#4 lightsout

lightsout

    Doin' stuff...thaaaangs

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,733 posts

Posted 20 April 2012 - 10:22 PM

Sickening. I want to know why this piece of poo did it. What motivated him? Sure, he thinks fetuses are babies, but what would drive him to want to burn down a building and harm people? I wonder...

#5 NanuqoftheNorth

NanuqoftheNorth

    Frosty Alaskan Amber

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,638 posts
  • LocationAlaska

Posted 20 April 2012 - 11:10 PM

If the Feds prosecuted this guy as a terrorist you know what would happen... the Tea Party would be calling it a War on Babies!

#6 SmootsDaddy89

SmootsDaddy89

    Just Say No To Boo

  • ALL-PRO
  • 10,299 posts

Posted 21 April 2012 - 12:39 AM

Toby Keith song inc

#7 cantrell

cantrell

    secular progressive bogeyman

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,447 posts

Posted 21 April 2012 - 02:27 AM

If the Feds prosecuted this guy as a terrorist you know what would happen... the Tea Party would be calling it a War on Babies!


the tea party would have a fuging conniption fit because charging a white conservative terrorist as a terrorist is literally the closest thing to oppression that they'd ever fuging see

#8 NanuqoftheNorth

NanuqoftheNorth

    Frosty Alaskan Amber

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,638 posts
  • LocationAlaska

Posted 21 April 2012 - 02:42 AM

the tea party would have a fuging conniption fit because charging a white conservative terrorist as a terrorist is literally the closest thing to oppression that they'd ever fuging see


Ha ha, so true!

#9 Chimera

Chimera

    Membrane

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,009 posts

Posted 23 April 2012 - 12:26 AM

Is this the same guy from 3 weeks ago?
http://www.carolinah..._1#entry1716936

Whatever your personal views are, it says in the article linked in the OP why he isn't being treated like a terrorist.

Assistant United States Attorney William Roach, whose office is prosecuting the case, says Grady’s alleged attack did not rise to the level of domestic terrorism, primarily because Grady torched an unoccupied room in an empty building



#10 cantrell

cantrell

    secular progressive bogeyman

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,447 posts

Posted 23 April 2012 - 12:57 AM

so he isn't being charged with terrorism after trying to destroy a planned parenthood because no one was there? well that sure seems to contradict this article about "ecoterrorism"

http://www.foxnews.c...,343768,00.html

For nearly seven years, the nation has turned its terror focus on Al Qaeda and the hunt for Usama bin Laden. But there is a domestic terror threat that federal officials still consider priority No. 1 — eco-terrorism.


FBI estimates place damages from these attacks at well over $100 million. So far, no one has been killed.


it's almost as if there's a double standard that benefits white christians but that sure would be odd here in america given their history of being oppressed at every turn :( :( :(

#11 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • ALL-PRO
  • 23,639 posts

Posted 23 April 2012 - 09:01 AM

I don't think that this bombing should be equated to eco-terrorism, as it's intent is usually not to intimidate, but to actually cause monetary damages.

This guy was trying to intimidate people without killing them, which surely meets the legal definition of terrorism, but because he did it in such a weak sauce way it's been downplayed so as to not incite copycats IMHO.

#12 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,687 posts

Posted 23 April 2012 - 09:06 AM

According to rodeo...Ayers and Dorne weren't terrorists because they targetted empty buildings. Which is it. Are all these people terrorists or not.

In my opinion...they are.

#13 Chimera

Chimera

    Membrane

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,009 posts

Posted 23 April 2012 - 09:42 AM

so he isn't being charged with terrorism after trying to destroy a planned parenthood because no one was there? well that sure seems to contradict this article about "ecoterrorism"
http://www.foxnews.c...,343768,00.html
it's almost as if there's a double standard that benefits white christians but that sure would be odd here in america given their history of being oppressed at every turn :( :( :(


Interesting points, but the link brings up examples that don't compare to burning an empty building...

The torching of luxury homes in the swank Seattle suburb of Woodinville....



"It remains what we would probably consider the No. 1 domestic terrorism threat, because they have successfully continued to conduct different types of attacks in and around the country," said FBI Special Agent Richard Kolko.

However, that article does contain a tidbit that backs up your views..


The FBI defines eco-terrorism "as the use or threatened use of violence of a criminal nature against innocent victims or property by an environmentally oriented, subnational group for environmental-political reasons, or aimed at an audience beyond the target, often of a symbolic nature."


Maybe time to get the FBI and Justice Department on the same page? I see reason for it.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com