Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Why Not Kuechly To Tampa?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
39 replies to this topic

#1 BigEric

BigEric

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 14-February 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 141
  • Reputation: 54
HUDDLER

Posted 22 April 2012 - 02:14 PM

I know normally MLBs don't go top five unless they're "blue chip", but, why does it seem like a lock in every mock that I read that they'll draft Claiborne? I know he'll be BPA there, but it doesn't fill a huge need. Eric Wright, Aqib(pending), and Ronde is a lot invested in CB, while they have trash bags at MLB.

Why is there no hype that the draft will look like this?

1. IND-Luck
2. WAS- Griffin
3. MIN- Kalil
4. CLE- Richardson
5. TB- Kuechly
6. STL- Blackmon
7. JAX- Floyd/Ingram/Coples
8. MIA- Tannehill
9. Car- Claiborne.

#2 HeatCheck

HeatCheck

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 09-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,774
  • Reputation: 81
HUDDLER

Posted 22 April 2012 - 02:15 PM

Because Claiborne is that much better at their respective position than Kuechly that there is little value in selecting Luke over Mo.

#3 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 24,912
  • Reputation: 5,827
Moderators

Posted 22 April 2012 - 02:22 PM

God I wish

#4 TylerVagyler

TylerVagyler

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 02-January 11
  • posts: 2,224
  • Reputation: 576
SUPPORTER

Posted 22 April 2012 - 02:23 PM

I still think if Mo gets by Tampa, the Rams would take him over Blackmon. And if that didn't happen he'd go at 7/8 in a trade up.

#5 Dpantherman

Dpantherman

    certified pee-on

  • Joined: 17-January 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 26,478
  • Reputation: 558
HUDDLER

Posted 22 April 2012 - 02:28 PM

Because it doesn't make sense

#6 CarolinaNCSU

CarolinaNCSU

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 12-September 11
  • posts: 5,735
  • Reputation: 2,619
SUPPORTER

Posted 22 April 2012 - 02:29 PM

Eric Wright blows
Barber is old
Talib is headed to jail


I pray they don't take Claiborne

#7 Argus Plexus

Argus Plexus

    Super Kami Guru

  • Joined: 13-September 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,802
  • Reputation: 848
HUDDLER

Posted 22 April 2012 - 02:29 PM

They're dumb, but not that dumb.

#8 Ivan The Awesome

Ivan The Awesome

    Keep Pounding...all the way to...the draft! :D

  • Joined: 11-May 11
  • posts: 10,055
  • Reputation: 2,759
SUPPORTER

Posted 22 April 2012 - 02:30 PM

facepalm.jpg

#9 rodeo

rodeo

    Keelah se'lai

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 16,827
  • Reputation: 4,817
HUDDLER

Posted 22 April 2012 - 02:34 PM

facepalm.jpg

You have to put [img] brackets and a full URL. It's 2012 dude learn computers.

#10 Dex

Dex

    Knight of Sunlight

  • Joined: 25-July 11
  • posts: 7,556
  • Reputation: 7,111
SUPPORTER

Posted 22 April 2012 - 02:36 PM

You have to put [img] brackets and a full URL. It's 2012 dude learn computers.

I think he did it on purpose showing how little he cares for this thread. The message was still clear but with 90% less effort of finding a link.

#11 La Pantera

La Pantera

    humpin' habanero

  • Joined: 22-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,863
  • Reputation: 802
HUDDLER

Posted 22 April 2012 - 02:37 PM

Aqib will likely be in jail,Wright is average and Barber has been moved to safety.

#12 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,163
  • Reputation: 5,310
Moderators

Posted 22 April 2012 - 02:39 PM

Richardson will almost single handedly fix their offense. Blount has gotten to the point he tips off literally almost every play. Plus, Richardson is a beast on top of being the diverse RB they need. Richardson's impact IMO could be bigger than anyone in this draft. Normally, I am not a fan of drafting RBs high.....but it is almost scary how much he could aid the offense.

Plus, they have no CBs in the NFCS.....so again, Claiborne is easily a better choice

I hope for our sake....they get Claiborne

#13 mav1234

mav1234

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 18-October 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 17,038
  • Reputation: 2,233
HUDDLER

Posted 22 April 2012 - 02:53 PM

Richardson will almost single handedly fix their offense. Blount has gotten to the point he tips off literally almost every play. Plus, Richardson is a beast on top of being the diverse RB they need. Richardson's impact IMO could be bigger than anyone in this draft. Normally, I am not a fan of drafting RBs high.....but it is almost scary how much he could aid the offense.

Plus, they have no CBs in the NFCS.....so again, Claiborne is easily a better choice

I hope for our sake....they get Claiborne


in the above mock, Richardson is off the board when they pick.

It would be nice if we didn't have to play Richardson, we have enough trouble stopping the run..

I would love for them to take Kuechely because I would feel much more comfortable thinking we will walk away with a good DL prospect that way. :P

#14 The Special One

The Special One

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 15-March 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,228
  • Reputation: 120
HUDDLER

Posted 22 April 2012 - 02:56 PM

If Vikes take Claiborne and Browns take Richardson, who would the Bucs take?

#15 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,163
  • Reputation: 5,310
Moderators

Posted 22 April 2012 - 03:01 PM

If Vikes take Claiborne and Browns take Richardson, who would the Bucs take?

I would think with those 2 gone they try to trade down