Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Saints' Loomis Could Eavesdrop On Opposing Teams.


  • Please log in to reply
185 replies to this topic

#121 Who Dat Pat

Who Dat Pat

    Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 416 posts
  • LocationWho Dat Nation

Posted 23 April 2012 - 05:58 PM

Where is who dat alejandro?


I had a closing for an office park my client bought , not all of us are wealthy enough to type on a forum all day long.

Greg Bensel, Saints vice president of communications, said Monday afternoon on behalf of the Saints and Loomis: "This is 1,000 percent false. This is 1,000 percent inaccurate."


"Outside the Lines" could not determine for certain whether Loomis ever made use of the electronic setup.


The wiretap didn't seem to help the Saints in those three seasons. The team was a mediocre 12-12 at home while Loomis had access to his alleged bug. Drew Brees, and playoff success, didn't come until later. Not that it matters.


But the statute of limitations, the window federal prosecutors have to pursue any criminal charges against Loomis or the Saints, would only extend for five years after the date of such an offense, Emmick said.


#122 Gallagher

Gallagher

    Never Doubt Davis

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,301 posts
  • LocationLos Angeles, CA

Posted 23 April 2012 - 06:02 PM

Yeah, but the NFL doesn't have a statute of limitations.

#123 Brooklyn Bully

Brooklyn Bully

    Sell it, Jerry

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,466 posts

Posted 23 April 2012 - 06:04 PM

Saint Fan Yesterday: Spygate! Patriots are teh cheaters!!11

Saint Fan Today: Everyone spies on other teams like this! This in non-newzzz!!11

#124 La Pantera

La Pantera

    humpin' habanero

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,775 posts

Posted 23 April 2012 - 06:06 PM

Never made use of it??? Get real you dumb ass Taints fan! What was it there for...LOOKS?


Oh it was there but we didn't use it. It must be like Who Dat Pats penis...

#125 Cold Cat

Cold Cat

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 502 posts

Posted 23 April 2012 - 06:09 PM

Dang. This is awesome. Glad the Saints are getting exposed.

#126 TNPanther

TNPanther

    Jimmie Rustler

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,129 posts
  • LocationKnoxville, TN

Posted 23 April 2012 - 06:11 PM

So, Aints* fans are using their mediocrity as evidence/an excuse against cheating during those years.



You really can't make this sh*t up.


#127 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • ALL-PRO
  • 42,321 posts
  • LocationSC

Posted 23 April 2012 - 06:19 PM

So, Aints* fans are using their mediocrity as evidence/an excuse against cheating during those years.



You really can't make this sh*t up.


Doesn't really work either.

In the three seasons the system was in use, their worst record was 8-8. They were .500 at home.

In the first season during which it was no longer available, they went 3-13, with only one of those wins coming at home (and it wasn't even the Superdome).

So the argument doesn't really work. But if you want to accept it in part, worth pointing out that while cheating is bad enough, cheating and still sucking is just pathetic.

#128 KillerKat

KillerKat

    Top Banana

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,710 posts

Posted 23 April 2012 - 06:37 PM

I had a closing for an office park my client bought , not all of us are wealthy enough to type on a forum all day long.

Greg Bensel, Saints vice president of communications, said Monday afternoon on behalf of the Saints and Loomis: "This is 1,000 percent false. This is 1,000 percent inaccurate."


"Outside the Lines" could not determine for certain whether Loomis ever made use of the electronic setup.


The wiretap didn't seem to help the Saints in those three seasons. The team was a mediocre 12-12 at home while Loomis had access to his alleged bug. Drew Brees, and playoff success, didn't come until later. Not that it matters.


But the statute of limitations, the window federal prosecutors have to pursue any criminal charges against Loomis or the Saints, would only extend for five years after the date of such an offense, Emmick said.



Yea like the guy is going to say "yea we did it, you caught us!"...also, just because your record wasn't that good, doesn't mean that what they did wasn't bad...

#129 DaCityKats

DaCityKats

    feed KB 2014

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,673 posts
  • LocationDa City

Posted 23 April 2012 - 06:37 PM

Posted Image

this is what i did after i seen espn.

#130 Cape Fear Cat

Cape Fear Cat

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 828 posts

Posted 23 April 2012 - 06:53 PM

JUst made a good point on ESPN. Loomis is going to have to know the verbage to translate then shoot it down to Payton in time to make adjustments. I don't see this being anything big, that would be really tough to do. Hopefully it's true but I doubt it.


Whether Loomis could effectively utilize the info is beside the point. What he is accused of doing was expressly against NFL rules, and federal law. Even if he was unable to use the info in the moment, who's to say he was not able to communicate what he heard after the games, so that the next time the teams played the Saints, the NO coaching staff had a well-prepared intelligence binder that may have given them an edge?

#131 Floppin

Floppin

    Smooches

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,741 posts
  • LocationShallotte, NC

Posted 23 April 2012 - 06:56 PM

So I haven't read the reports yet, I've been really busy today, but can someone let me know why this stopped in 2004 (besides the obvious) and how they know it wasn't continued later?

#132 Kyle82

Kyle82

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,939 posts
  • LocationRock Hill SC

Posted 23 April 2012 - 07:31 PM

Dang. This is awesome. Glad the Saints are getting exposed.


The Aints** have been the doormat of the NFL for 40 plus years...they are so used to negativity.....I would hate like hell to be a fan of this sorry team and travel 'supporting' my team in another stadium. Gonna be a bad year for them :lol:

#133 Kyle82

Kyle82

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,939 posts
  • LocationRock Hill SC

Posted 23 April 2012 - 07:33 PM

So I haven't read the reports yet, I've been really busy today, but can someone let me know why this stopped in 2004 (besides the obvious) and how they know it wasn't continued later?


The Statute of Limitations in Louisiana only goes as far as 6 years

#134 BANE

BANE

    MEMBER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 888 posts
  • LocationCollege

Posted 23 April 2012 - 07:33 PM

Please, please, just kick those assholes out of the league. Just let New Orleans continue to rot. No need to keep that place propped up with an NFL franchise.

#135 malik

malik

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 696 posts

Posted 23 April 2012 - 07:40 PM

A classy man like Jerry Richardson would never do something like this.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com