Jump to content




* * - - - 6 votes

Drew Brees Is Not An Elite Qb?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
71 replies to this topic

#25 tondi

tondi

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 21-February 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,235
  • Reputation: 707
HUDDLER

Posted 24 April 2012 - 11:53 AM

Brees was actually a worse QB on the road last season and a much worse QB when playing outside. Take it for what its worth.

#26 SCP

SCP

    Crop Dusting Son of a Bitch

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 22,136
  • Reputation: 19,490
HUDDLER

Posted 24 April 2012 - 11:53 AM

The one lesson from all of these Saint* cheating episodes is this: you cant believe one word that comes out of the mouths of the Saints front office, coaching staff, or players.

#27 Dex

Dex

    Knight of Sunlight

  • Joined: 25-July 11
  • posts: 8,129
  • Reputation: 7,782
SUPPORTER

Posted 24 April 2012 - 11:54 AM

fug u fug

#28 PhillyB

PhillyB

    sườn núi phía đông thứ ba của mặt trời

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • posts: 23,894
  • Reputation: 20,229
SUPPORTER

Posted 24 April 2012 - 11:55 AM

stop making panthers fans look stupid

#29 L-TownCat

L-TownCat

    Baptized In The Blood Of Saints

  • Joined: 27-June 11
  • posts: 6,590
  • Reputation: 4,762
SUPPORTER

Posted 24 April 2012 - 11:56 AM

Attached File  63b.png   49.34KB   0 downloads

#30 Guest_fug_*

Guest_fug_*
Guests

Posted 24 April 2012 - 11:56 AM

Tying to change subject now that you made a fool of yourself!? At least read the article your talking about so at least your crazy conspiracy theory can have even a 1% chance of happening. Thanks for laugh! :D :D


Posted Image

#31 SCP

SCP

    Crop Dusting Son of a Bitch

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 22,136
  • Reputation: 19,490
HUDDLER

Posted 24 April 2012 - 11:57 AM

The failure to successfully cheat does not dismiss the act of cheating. It just validates the stupidity of the Saints* and their fans.

#32 Kuech Da Sneak

Kuech Da Sneak

    As long as we aren't 32.

  • Joined: 27-April 11
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 888
  • Reputation: 90
HUDDLER

Posted 24 April 2012 - 11:57 AM

Your name is fug, your topic is poo, and I wish the forum would filter out your garbage posts.

Still not as bad as our resident taints** troll though.

#33 Who Dat Pat

Who Dat Pat

    Member

  • Joined: 25-March 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 416
  • Reputation: -165
HUDDLER

Posted 24 April 2012 - 11:57 AM

The one lesson from all of these Saint* cheating episodes is this: you cant believe one word that comes out of the mouths of the Saints front office, coaching staff, or players.


How about believing the word of the "anonymous" source that only ESPN was able to find, that waited 8 years to say anything and is claiming that allegedly the device was wired to eavesdrop, BUT NEVER ALLEGES LOOMIS DID EAVESDROP. Also ESPN clearly stated that there is no proof of Loomis using the device to eavesdrop.

#34 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,262
  • Reputation: 5,361
Moderators

Posted 24 April 2012 - 11:57 AM

Anyone who imagines for one second that the Saints actually used this advantage during a game is an absolute moron.

1) Loomis would have had to intercept the calls, understand exactly what those calls meant, relay those calls to his coaches, who would then have to relay that information onto the field before the snap, and then hope that the defense actually know how to adjust to make use of that tip. It's absurd to believe that they attempted to do any of that and still played horribly as a team.

2) The timeframe when Loomis is accused predate Brees. Your conjecture fails.

3) The only thing Loomis could have been conceivably doing was cataloging opposing teams' calls for future reference, which would also provide a competitive advantage, just not at the same level. TI believe he was just being snooping like an idiot and no competitive advantage was gained. However, the advantage or lack thereof is irrelevant; the mere fact it was being done at all is enough for the NFL to smack the Saints down and for lawsuits to get involved.

In summary, much like the bounty scheme, the Saints have been caught doing something that could plausibly give them a slight advantage, but clearly screwed it up by neither gaining an advantage nor failing to keep it covered up. They truly are an epic failure of a franchise, and that is far more laughable than anything else to come out of these stories.


See my post earlier in this thread. How would that not be a realistic advantage.

But that has nothing to do with Brees

#35 mr beauxjangles

mr beauxjangles

    Large Member

  • Joined: 18-February 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,514
  • Reputation: 575
HUDDLER

Posted 24 April 2012 - 12:00 PM

The Saints and Loomis are accused of wiretapping from 2002 until 2005, when the equipment was removed during the Superdome's housing of evacuees from Katrina. Brees joined the Saints in 2006.

So no.

#36 SCP

SCP

    Crop Dusting Son of a Bitch

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 22,136
  • Reputation: 19,490
HUDDLER

Posted 24 April 2012 - 12:00 PM

I don't care if Loomis listened or if some hack intern listened, I just think its awesome to see your little *Saints franchise exposed for the low life group it is.