Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

Mark Carrier Says We Would Have Taken Barron Ahead Of Kuechly

Draft kuechly

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
58 replies to this topic

#25 Ivan The Awesome

Ivan The Awesome

    Keep Pounding...all the way to...the draft! :D

  • Joined: 11-May 11
  • posts: 10,128
  • Reputation: 2,848
SUPPORTER

Posted 30 April 2012 - 04:45 PM

That would have been a horrible pick.

#26 The Special One

The Special One

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 15-March 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,228
  • Reputation: 120
HUDDLER

Posted 30 April 2012 - 04:46 PM

Taking Barron would have been pretty shocking.

#27 KendrickPanther

KendrickPanther

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 21-March 12
  • posts: 9,375
  • Reputation: 5,142
SUPPORTER

Posted 30 April 2012 - 04:48 PM

I really don't see why he'd admit to that. There's no reason to make Luke think he was our second choice and we only took him because we couldn't get the guy we really wanted.


Well I didn't know Mark Carrier is on twitter until about 5 minutes ago so maybe that is your answer.

#28 Panthers128

Panthers128

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 04-January 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,283
  • Reputation: 104
HUDDLER

Posted 30 April 2012 - 04:48 PM

Guys, we should've taken Andrew Luck! Imagine the trade value!

#29 CatMan72

CatMan72

    KEEP POUNDING

  • Joined: 04-January 09
  • posts: 15,690
  • Reputation: 2,865
SUPPORTER

Posted 30 April 2012 - 05:22 PM

LOL, awkward.

#30 chknwing

chknwing

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 04-May 09
  • posts: 8,688
  • Reputation: 6,753
SUPPORTER

Posted 30 April 2012 - 05:24 PM

why would someone from within the organization say this, its kind a knock against keuchly. telling the guy hes not their first choice but he'll do? I hope this isn't true.

#31 Proudiddy

Proudiddy

    The Thread Killer (Since 2004)

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 17,667
  • Reputation: 5,608
Moderators

Posted 30 April 2012 - 05:27 PM

I doubt he gets fired, but I DO think Marty will be out getting his PR on with "I haven't heard those comments, but as I've said, Luke was the guy we targeted and we're lucky to have him."

Really dumb of Mark to say this regardless, doesn't do any good for anyone. Especially considering Barron was drafted by a rival.

#32 Floppin

Floppin

    Smooches

  • Joined: 10-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,957
  • Reputation: 3,467
HUDDLER

Posted 30 April 2012 - 05:28 PM

Carrier drinking before noon I see. What a dipshit.

#33 cookinbrak

cookinbrak

    tastes like chicken...

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,830
  • Reputation: 854
HUDDLER

Posted 30 April 2012 - 05:31 PM

If this is true, then I suspect we will pick up a starting quality safety when one becomes available and drop Martin like a bad habit


You know who'd make a good safety? Thomas Davis.

#34 Panths

Panths

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 29-July 10
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 727
  • Reputation: 76
HUDDLER

Posted 30 April 2012 - 06:10 PM

Well he'll be going the way of Gantt any day now.

#35 BeasonBeastingBacks

BeasonBeastingBacks

    Farewell Sweet Prince

  • Joined: 29-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,535
  • Reputation: 523
HUDDLER

Posted 30 April 2012 - 06:13 PM

Not only are we degrading Martin, we also make Luke feel like poo too.
2 birds with one stone baby!

#36 CPF4LIFE

CPF4LIFE

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 10-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,760
  • Reputation: 1,479
HUDDLER

Posted 30 April 2012 - 06:19 PM

Holy crap!! I sure did say somethin similar to this before the draft lol. Barron is a certified playmaker which is what we need more then anything on our defense. So i could understand this.