Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Mark Carrier Says We Would Have Taken Barron Ahead Of Kuechly

Draft kuechly

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
58 replies to this topic

#21 stirs

stirs

    I Reckon So

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,075
  • Reputation: 1,997
HUDDLER

Posted 30 April 2012 - 04:22 PM

I would have taken Claiborne over Keuchley.

I would have taken Kalil over Kuechley.


Baron went first, so what the heck was his point. Barron was not available when we picked. Kinda stupid to make a comment like this when there is no point.

#22 chris999

chris999

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,043
  • Reputation: 239
HUDDLER

Posted 30 April 2012 - 04:28 PM

Why would you say that? Seems weird to say that now.


No poo.

That sure is a good way to show support for the player they just drafted...

I guess they are coverning their bases if Luke were to some reason not reach his potential, they can say "hey, we didnt want him anyway..."

#23 KendrickPanther

KendrickPanther

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 21-March 12
  • posts: 8,988
  • Reputation: 4,853
SUPPORTER

Posted 30 April 2012 - 04:29 PM

I loved Barron, would have been happy with him.

#24 CCS

CCS

    Glutton for heart break and punishment

  • Joined: 13-February 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,439
  • Reputation: 367
HUDDLER

Posted 30 April 2012 - 04:31 PM

I really don't see why he'd admit to that. There's no reason to make Luke think he was our second choice and we only took him because we couldn't get the guy we really wanted.

#25 Ivan The Awesome

Ivan The Awesome

    Keep Pounding...all the way to...the draft! :D

  • Joined: 11-May 11
  • posts: 10,045
  • Reputation: 2,742
SUPPORTER

Posted 30 April 2012 - 04:45 PM

That would have been a horrible pick.

#26 The Special One

The Special One

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 15-March 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,228
  • Reputation: 120
HUDDLER

Posted 30 April 2012 - 04:46 PM

Taking Barron would have been pretty shocking.

#27 KendrickPanther

KendrickPanther

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 21-March 12
  • posts: 8,988
  • Reputation: 4,853
SUPPORTER

Posted 30 April 2012 - 04:48 PM

I really don't see why he'd admit to that. There's no reason to make Luke think he was our second choice and we only took him because we couldn't get the guy we really wanted.


Well I didn't know Mark Carrier is on twitter until about 5 minutes ago so maybe that is your answer.

#28 Panthers128

Panthers128

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 04-January 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,283
  • Reputation: 104
HUDDLER

Posted 30 April 2012 - 04:48 PM

Guys, we should've taken Andrew Luck! Imagine the trade value!

#29 CatMan72

CatMan72

    KEEP POUNDING

  • Joined: 04-January 09
  • posts: 15,554
  • Reputation: 2,800
SUPPORTER

Posted 30 April 2012 - 05:22 PM

LOL, awkward.

#30 chknwing

chknwing

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 04-May 09
  • posts: 8,185
  • Reputation: 6,118
SUPPORTER

Posted 30 April 2012 - 05:24 PM

why would someone from within the organization say this, its kind a knock against keuchly. telling the guy hes not their first choice but he'll do? I hope this isn't true.