Can We Stop Pretending That Ron Edwards Is Anything Special
#31
Posted 02 May 2012 - 12:07 AM
#32
Posted 02 May 2012 - 12:08 AM
oh for fugs sake. he played seven seasons with kansas city iirc, never missed a game, and after he goes down with a freakish injury, literally the only one of his career, you mental giants are labeling him 'injury prone?'
kansas city fans were livid when the front office failed to re-sign him and he walked as a free agent. he was considered our big free agent splash of the 2011 season and an outstanding signing that would fit the mcdermott model of fatass lineman that hog blockers. he has never played a down of football with the carolina panthers so unless you're scouring your game tape from youtube videos and analyzing his play with the chiefs you have exactly zero ground on which to stand.
the jury is out on edwards. it always has been and it will be until we get a look at him in training camp. I swear to god I know actual oysters with more intellectual firepower than some of the chronic bitchers patrolling this establishment
You are like the only person on here that actually has common sense and isn't a complete moron about everything. Well there are a couple others, but it's very few.
#33
Posted 02 May 2012 - 12:10 AM
#34
Posted 02 May 2012 - 01:03 AM
There is only one Suh in the league. The ghost of Haynesworth has floated away. In other words, there ain't too many starting DTs that are elite. Most are like Ron Edwards.
#35
Posted 02 May 2012 - 01:10 AM
#36
Posted 02 May 2012 - 01:38 AM
#37
Posted 02 May 2012 - 02:20 AM
That's good enough for me!
#38
Posted 02 May 2012 - 02:33 AM
i think everyone realizes that the DT spot could use some better, more experienced players. but there is some potential and as rivera keeps saying, they played pretty well towards the end of the year.
#39
Posted 02 May 2012 - 03:07 AM
Antonio Garay, signed off of the Jets' practice squad. Same age, body, and talents as Edwards, only not as good.
Rivera's scheme doesn't require anything more, Edwards is the ideal fit for it.
#40
Posted 02 May 2012 - 05:36 AM
Plug in Edwards and Shirley. Shirley had 2 sacks and a forced fumble in 4 games. Run D improved with Shirley and Kearse on the field.
Doubtful that we would play Edwards and Shirley at the same time. Both are the same type of player...large space eating NT type. You would typically play a quicker UT along side your NT....similar to McClain, Kearse, or Neblett.
But, you never know what Rivera will Di.
#41
Posted 02 May 2012 - 05:37 AM
Quick, who was the DT on the Chargers when they were ranked #1 under Rivera? Surely an all-pro level talent, right?
Antonio Garay, signed off of the Jets' practice squad. Same age, body, and talents as Edwards, only not as good.
Rivera's scheme doesn't require anything more, Edwards is the ideal fit for it.
Exactly. Rivera's scheme is built around the LB play.
#42
Posted 02 May 2012 - 07:15 AM
#43
Posted 02 May 2012 - 07:24 AM
We don't need any of the DTs to do anything special. We just need two big dudes in there eating up blocks. Edwards and Shirley are both 330-340. Kearse is 320. We just need them to hold their ground and not get buried like Fua did all last year. Fua was thrown around like a wet paper towel. We need two big fat strong pigs in there. Hopefully they crush golden corral every night packing on pounds. The bigger the better
Edwards is 315
#44
Posted 02 May 2012 - 07:24 AM
#45
Posted 02 May 2012 - 07:26 AM
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: dt, defense, dline, ron edwards
Football →
Carolina Panthers →
Bigger Problem: Offense or Defense?Started by Aframian, 20 Nov 2012 |
|
|
||
Football →
The NFL Draft →
BBB's NFL Draft Mock 1.0Started by BeasonBeastingBacks, 22 Oct 2012 |
|
|
||
Football →
Carolina Panthers →
Defensive Preview: Carolina Panthers 2012.Started by Ivan The Awesome, 17 Jul 2012 |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





