Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

breezing2anotherSB

How Would You Feel If You Were Accused, Convicted And Sentenced

175 posts in this topic

One thing that is for sure is that you can count on universal uninformed, knee jerk, bullshit on message boards and it has nothing to with what team one follows or stance one takes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


It's pointless even trying to discuss this with people who choose to be blind.

And yes I was shocked that he got a year and wasn't contacted by the League first.

rest assured he was contacted first .. the nfl did it the right way .. they're not going to risk being sued themselves because of a procedural issue .. over such an important issue

Vilma is just butt hurt and is speaking in a manner that indicates an attorney (who is prob trying to get some air time) is telling him to

I would be utterly shocked if the nfl didn't dot their I's and cross their T's on this one

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TCF, while I find it admirable you want to see some evidence firsthand, it is pretty sad you think just because something doesn't show on the first page of your Google search it didn't happen. Half of this thread told you the same effing thing over and over again. Some of us actually pay attention to what goes on in the NFL and don't need others to do our research for us.

I have been following this very closely, because like everybody else here, I have been expecting lengthy suspensions, and I thought therewould have been way more than what was handed down. (which btw is kind if a bummer)

I google searched it several different ways and could not come up with the NFL's official press release on this matter. You all were telling me things that EVERYBODY already knew. I just wanted some evidence that I could read and readily make y own decision. Upon Mr Scott providing what I could not find, I was extremely happy with the outcome. ESPN didn't even have the official release, nor was it on NFL.com.

It doesn't really matter tbh, what's done is done, and if the League has the evidence (and after reading their release it seems apparent that they do) then I highly doubt any of the suspensions will be reduced or overturned.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why are you guys still discussing this retarded poo?

You realized cheating2anotherSB stopped posting after Scot proved to him that his entire argument was retarded right?

That was on the first page...

Figured I'd bump this from page 4 since apparently no one has gotten the hint yet.

This guy is a lame troll, every time one of his idiotic statements gets refuted he disappears for half a day to try and come up with some new brilliant reason why his team is in fact not a bunch of shitdicks.

In conclusion, cheating2anotherSB go hang out with that other loser Saints* fan with the nerdy ass picture that is forever posting on here with the same hilariously awful attempts at starting these ridiculous threads.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been following this very closely, because like everybody else here, I have been expecting lengthy suspensions, and I thought therewould have been way more than what was handed down. (which btw is kind if a bummer)

I google searched it several different ways and could not come up with the NFL's official press release on this matter. You all were telling me things that EVERYBODY already knew. I just wanted some evidence that I could read and readily make y own decision. Upon Mr Scott providing what I could not find, I was extremely happy with the outcome. ESPN didn't even have the official release, nor was it on NFL.com.

It doesn't really matter tbh, what's done is done, and if the League has the evidence (and after reading their release it seems apparent that they do) then I highly doubt any of the suspensions will be reduced or overturned.

dude .. look at it like this

do you think a multi-billion $$$ organization would make such a loud move if they were unsure regarding the evidence they obtained in the process?

there was very likely overwhelming evidence

like I've said before .. their attorneys are very well paid and the best of the best .. they know in advance exactly what a court will want to see in the event they are sued

to make a move like this .. and then to have it overturned by a court .. would be too embrassing for the league

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been following this very closely, because like everybody else here, I have been expecting lengthy suspensions, and I thought therewould have been way more than what was handed down. (which btw is kind if a bummer)

I google searched it several different ways and could not come up with the NFL's official press release on this matter. You all were telling me things that EVERYBODY already knew. I just wanted some evidence that I could read and readily make y own decision. Upon Mr Scott providing what I could not find, I was extremely happy with the outcome. ESPN didn't even have the official release, nor was it on NFL.com.

It doesn't really matter tbh, what's done is done, and if the League has the evidence (and after reading their release it seems apparent that they do) then I highly doubt any of the suspensions will be reduced or overturned.

I tend to agree with you on this. I'm not outraged about the punishments or their severity but it's just a bit odd how this has been done. If you step out of the weird world of the Huddle you get the sense that most people question the way this is being handled.

You simple aren't going to have an intelligent or unbiased conversation about this here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OP is just another sad Saints*** Fan or player who continues to justify and lie about what they did.

If there is a such thing as karma, Brees would be carted off the field early this season. I am not wishing injury on him, but that franchise deserves the very same outcome that their pathetic behavior was attempting to inflict on other players.

How's Week 2 sound?

Edit: And just so everyone knows I wasn't being serious It'll be Steve Smith who does it. Yeah, fear not, our safety problem is solved.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey guys: Remember when Breezingtoa7-9record posted about how Nicks would re-sign? Then bolded a quote about how much he liked being in NO?

Wait, wait, wait. Remember when he posted over a month ago that the Brees deal was gonna get worked out and he was gonna take a hometown discount so they could keep all their players?

Yeah, the whole bolding statements in an article is oh so convincing. Please, just leave.

(I'd add a "nobody likes you" in there for good measure but truth be told I love watching you 'represent' your team and fan by making an ass out of yourself)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Xtherox... Again, you're not telling me anything I didn't already know. I just needed to see it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I tend to agree with you on this. I'm not outraged about the punishments or their severity but it's just a bit odd how this has been done. If you step out of the weird world of the Huddle you get the sense that most people question the way this is being handled.

You simple aren't going to have an intelligent or unbiased conversation about this here.

When I step out of the world of the Huddle and enter the real world in PA, no one gives a poo about the Saints**** or talks about bountygate.

Side note. Zod should make the word "Saints**" treated like fug. Anyone that types "Saints**" should be automatically changed to Saints*** .

Edit: Looks like that has already been done. Saints*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Xtherox... Again, you're not telling me anything I didn't already know. I just needed to see it.

trucatzfan .. again stop getting your butt hurt .. it's an Internet forum .. no one is questioning your intelligence (or lack thereof)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wow. there is nothing wrong with wanting to see the fine print.

likely its the difference between "Mike Vick ran a dog fighting compound" and "evidence was found of electrocution, strangulation, starvation, and death by severe head trauma"

most people like to hear the details. wtf is the problem?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites