Comparing Lesean Mccoy's Contract To D-Will's
#1
Posted 17 May 2012 - 05:38 PM
28 year old Deangelo 5 year 43 million, 21 million guaranteed
Something doesn't belong.
#2
Posted 17 May 2012 - 05:41 PM
did you know we overpaid for deangelo williams
we overpaid for williams. you don't hand a contract like that to a running back.
look at this other running back and what he is paid.
you know who else i don't like? that marty hurney guy. he overpaid for deangelo.
i am heyyall. look, i have paula deen as my avatar. isn't that cool and didn't we overpay for deangelo williams?
did you know that marty hurney sucks? he overpaid deangelo williams. you don't hand that kind of money to a running back. look at this other running back and what he is paid by a general manager that is not marty hurney.
again, i have a paula deen avatar. isn't that funny and doesn't marty hurney suck?
i am heyyall
#3
Guest_Bwood_*
Posted 17 May 2012 - 05:43 PM
23 year old Lesean 5 year 45 million, 20 million guaranteed
28 year old Deangelo 5 year 43 million, 21 million guaranteed
Something doesn't belong.
You don't belong.
#4
Posted 17 May 2012 - 05:46 PM
#5
Posted 17 May 2012 - 05:48 PM
#6
Posted 17 May 2012 - 05:53 PM
I wouldn't say they're that far apart. McCoy is really good, putting my homerism aside he's probably better.By those numbers, they overpaid like crazy for McCoy. He's no where NEAR the back D-Will is.
#7
Posted 17 May 2012 - 05:56 PM
#8
Posted 17 May 2012 - 05:59 PM
By those numbers, they overpaid like crazy for McCoy. He's no where NEAR the back D-Will is.
Actually, Lesean is very good.
#9
Posted 17 May 2012 - 06:01 PM
I wouldn't say they're that far apart. McCoy is really good, putting my homerism aside he's probably better.
He's not better, not by a long shot. He's a back that doesn't split carries, so his numbers are going to be comparable. He's really good, but if their situations were reversed I think Deangelo would have produced a little better. That being said, McCoy deserves a slightly bigger contract than Deangelo because he's a lone back and he's younger.
#10
Posted 17 May 2012 - 06:02 PM
#11
Posted 17 May 2012 - 06:02 PM
DWill might seem to be overpaid, but we needed to keep him, and insuring that he will be with us for the long haul, we paid the man, a lot of people were complaining that our owner was cheap, and when he started paying players, everyone complained he was turning into Al Davis... Im happy we locked up DWill, and I'm happy he is happy, he deserved it...
#12
Posted 17 May 2012 - 06:05 PM
McCoy ranks third among all running backs with 166 receptions and despite piling up 801 total touches in his career.
He has surrendered just five fumbles (160.2 touches per fumble).
#13
Posted 17 May 2012 - 06:05 PM
So 28 is the new 60? DeAngelo is in the prime of his NFL career & at a peak age for a man's physical strength. It's not the NFL of the 90's where the RB is washed up by his 30th birthday. DeAngelo has split carries with Stewart & will prove to be worth his contract. It's a different situation from a Marshall Faulk or Eddie George. DeAngelo hasn't endured the same work load.
lol D-will is at his prime, despite not having a 1,000 yard season the past TWO seasons.
#14
Posted 17 May 2012 - 06:06 PM
hey ya'll i'm heyyall
did you know we overpaid for deangelo williams
we overpaid for williams. you don't hand a contract like that to a running back.
look at this other running back and what he is paid.
you know who else i don't like that? that marty hurney guy. he overpaid for deangelo.
i am heyyall. look, i have paula deen as my avatar. isn't that cool and didn't we overpay for deangelo williams?
did you know that marty hurney sucks? he overpaid deangelo williams. you don't hand that kind of money to a running back. look at this other running back and what he is paid by a general manager that is not marty hurney.
again, i have a paula deen avatar. isn't that funny and doesn't marty hurney suck?
i am heyyall
Aww you're so adorable!
#15
Posted 17 May 2012 - 06:06 PM
A policy for me? Wow, I'm absolutely flattered.heyyall the perfect reason for a higher post count for starting new threads.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





