You Are A Job Creator (If You Are Part Of The Middle Class)
Posted 18 May 2012 - 01:39 AM
Posted 18 May 2012 - 09:32 AM
Posted 18 May 2012 - 09:48 AM
If the middle class has the money to spend and theres a better idea out there, a middle class person will invent it and be able to market it for their own gain, instead of having some rich guy steal it via lawyers and decide whether it should be brought to market or tucked away so as to not compete with their own idea.
It seems so simple. To this day the rights utter fascination with defending the absurdly wealthy is one of the great mysteries of modern human nature to me.
Posted 18 May 2012 - 10:13 AM
Posted 18 May 2012 - 01:27 PM
Demand creates jobs. Where does demand come from? From the consumers. The workers. They create the job, they fill the job for a wage that nets the "creator" a profit, and then they consume the product. Meanwhile the "job creator" acts like they're doing you the favor by allowing you a living wage when all they've done was invest money that was rightfully earned by the worker in the first place.
Posted 18 May 2012 - 06:08 PM
Almost half the population votes against their own best interests!
Why do they want to go right back to the policies that have decimated the wages of 99% of Americans over the last 30 years?
Posted 18 May 2012 - 07:22 PM
Posted 18 May 2012 - 07:49 PM
It's a good thing that TED decided not to release this video. We can't let the common people believe that the rich don't really care about them.
I was going to post this in your other thread, but figured this is the one it will be discussed in. TED chose not to publish this speech and a lot of people didn't like that. They got creamed on a bunch of websites, I saw it on Reddit. The curator, Chris Anderson, posted this as a response to criticism, so I'll pass it along so people can hear both sides of the argument.
At TED this year, an attendee pitched a 3-minute audience talk on inequality. The talk tapped into a really important and timely issue. But it framed the issue in a way that was explicitly partisan. And it included a number of arguments that were unconvincing, even to those of us who supported his overall stance. The audience at TED who heard it live (and who are often accused of being overly enthusiastic about left-leaning ideas) gave it, on average, mediocre ratings.
We discussed internally and ultimately told the speaker we did not plan to post. He did not react well. He had hired a PR firm to promote the talk to MoveOn and others, and the PR firm warned us that unless we posted he would go to the press and accuse us of censoring him. We again declined and this time I wrote him and tried gently to explain in detail why I thought his talk was flawed.
So he forwarded portions of the private emails to a reporter and the National Journal duly bit on the story. And it was picked up by various other outlets.
TED in my opinion is pretty open to different ideas and like Chris said in the link, if they would have just published it a lot less people would have seen or cared about it.
Posted 18 May 2012 - 08:12 PM
TED didn't want to run the risk of alienating powerful 1%ers that do not share Nick Hanauer's views.
TED has been receiving quite a bit of bad press recently for not releasing it though.
I do know Nick has also been on a several networks recently discussing the same ideas in a related book, The Gardens Of Democracy.
Perhaps the popular response Nick Hanauer has received on his book tour, plus the external pressure from the media, convinced TED it was not "Class Warfare" to show some courage and support the majority of Americans in regaining their dignity.