Five Reasons To Be Optmistic About Carolina In 2012
#1
Posted 23 May 2012 - 10:30 PM
http://bleacherrepor...anthers-in-2012
I like #5 the best (f the Saints*)
#2
Posted 23 May 2012 - 10:34 PM
Useless and pathetic
Just saying.
Edit: Also I'm not saying you are useless or pathetic because from what I can tell you are a nice up and coming individual it's just well BR sucks ass.
#3
Posted 23 May 2012 - 10:36 PM
BRILLIANT!!!
#4
Posted 23 May 2012 - 10:38 PM
I threw up when I saw that BR quoted Kiper. Not one but two dumb asses in one column.
BRILLIANT!!!
That made my day. Thank you 8789.
#5
Posted 23 May 2012 - 10:39 PM
#6
Posted 23 May 2012 - 11:32 PM
#7
Posted 24 May 2012 - 02:18 AM
#8
Posted 24 May 2012 - 03:15 AM
#9
Posted 24 May 2012 - 08:19 AM
most bleacherreport articles are more well-written, sourced, and complete than the vast majority of OPs on here. i don't know why they get the auto-hate they do
IPlayedCaminMadden is a better source than BR, albeit he also probably posts on BR.
#10
Posted 24 May 2012 - 08:46 AM
really BR?
#11
Posted 24 May 2012 - 08:50 AM
#12
Posted 24 May 2012 - 08:55 AM
Beat me to it."chick picks"
really BR?
"Chick picks to go all dark horse on us"
That sounds pretty dirty. A 15 year old boy must've written that.
#13
Posted 24 May 2012 - 09:20 AM
most bleacherreport articles are more well-written, sourced, and complete than the vast majority of OPs on here. i don't know why they get the auto-hate they do
Not to speak for anyone else, but for me, their format is the problem.
The information can be great, but if you have to click through a 10 page slideshow to read a half-page of information, it just isn't worth it.
#14
Posted 24 May 2012 - 09:21 AM
Beat me to it.
"Chick picks to go all dark horse on us"
That sounds pretty dirty. A 15 year old boy must've written that.
..obviously the guy was trying to use the word chic but had no idea how it was spelled. Apparently there is no editing at BR. I do not auto-hate BR. They do some pretty decent work there as far as presentation goes and staying on top of things. Lots of these home grown sites fade over time and have front pages with severely dated material. Hate it or not, there is no denying that the BR guys are working pretty hard to put something substantial out there.
But chick instead of chic? That is pretty bad.
#15
Posted 24 May 2012 - 10:05 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





