Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

PantherBoy95

Jon Beason Responds To Alex Smith Comments

261 posts in this topic

If 17 TD passes is not going to get you in the Superbowl, how is 21 much better?

Smith had less than 1/3 of the Ints with almost all of the TD passes yet Beason acts like Smith wasn't throwing the ball which just makes Cam look bad when you look at TD passes and Ints.

Smith threw TDs more often and threw Ints waaaaaaaaaay less often.

This needs to end now before Beason looks really dumb

You're hilarious, let's start with cam had 35 tds the rushing cant be discounted. Secondly this is cams first season as compared to a veteran who's never been successful. It took 3+ years for smith to have close to yds tds and any other important number that cam does. There's no comparison it's like a highschool kid saying he can beat Matt Ryan. Smith is just an angry "ugly duckling" who doesn't know how to handle media because he's not used to ever winning because he never has.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the burning fallacy here is that newton is a rookie and those other dudes are veterans. if newton can rival their production then great.

i mean seriously why should it piss anyone off if matt moore or alex smith were better than newton according to some metrics? both of them were in situations where they were pretty much disposable if they didn't. moore is going to be fighting for his job again and there is no way alex smith gets that contract extension back in march if he sucked. they're 5 and 7 year vets respectively anyway, they should both play better than a rookie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the rushing touchdowns don't count right

Jon Beason didn't mention rushing TDs by a QB because he's not that dumb. I was responding to his quote. If you're mad at anyone, be mad at Jon Beason.

Go ahead, tweet him dummies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jon Beason didn't mention rushing TDs by a QB because he's not that dumb. I was responding to his quote. If you're mad at anyone, be mad at Jon Beason.

Go ahead, tweet him dummies.

thank you for the clarification i had no idea who or what to be mad at.

also i fail to understand how counting rushing touchdowns by a quarterback would make one "dumb". are they secretly not worth 6 points?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Beason doesn't think that throwing for 19 TD passes will get you a Superbowl, so he obviously feels that passing TDs are more meaningful to a QB than rushing TDs and should be accounted for separately as they are a more accurate depiction of where you are at as a QB.

I don't think Cam is living up to Beason's standards or he would have clearly mentioned rushing TDs as well. I guess it's something they can hash out in the locker room.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Beason doesn't think that throwing for 19 TD passes will get you a Superbowl, so he obviously feels that passing TDs are more meaningful to a QB than rushing TDs and should be accounted for separately as they are a more accurate depiction of where you are at as a QB.

I don't think Cam is living up to Beason's standards or he would have clearly mentioned rushing TDs as well. I guess it's something they can hash out in the locker room.

you specifically asserted that beason isn't dumb enough to mention rushing touchdowns by a quarterback. that sounds more like your opinion than anything beason actually said.

i feel that they should be accounted for separately as well. however you must also consider the number of possible redzone passing attempts taken away due to called runs in addition to handoffs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So he's either too dumb to mention it or not dumb enough to mention it.

You're choice.

Please tweet him your response.

I trust my defensive captain knows what he looks for in a QB and what he knows will help the team win. Rushing TDs by a QB ain't it. He also praised Smith's lack of turnovers. I know he wishes Cam didn't turn it over so much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So he's either too dumb to mention it or not dumb enough to mention it.

You're choice.

Please tweet him your response.

I trust my defensive captain knows what he looks for in a QB and what he knows will help the team win. Rushing TDs by a QB ain't it. He also praised Smith's lack of turnovers. I know he wishes Cam didn't turn it over so much.

i don't have a twitter account.

maybe you should tweet him your assertions and see if he agrees.

also what does karlos dansby have to do with this. ha ha, you get it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Posts

    • To me this off-season it makes the most since to keep CAP or Foz if it comes down to those two. CAP may be average, but that's as a 1st and 2nd down back which CMC, & Whit are not at this point from a full time perspective.  CAP is the best option to maintain a physical runner in the event (likely-hood) Stewart has to miss a couple games as he tends to each season.  I think it's common sense at this point. If we look at Stewart for what he is ''right now'' aside from pass protection there is not '' a lot'' that really separates him from CAP in my opinion, a few years ago it was a bigger gap, but at this point in Stewart's career he's becoming just a power runner, CAP is the closest we have to that. 
    • Dummy, come on man.    Rivera and DG tanked that game for a high pick. You guys know nothing about running a team.    The question now is, do we as huddles think you're a decent poster anymore. Answer is "no".  
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      18,246
    • Most Online
      2,867

    Newest Member
    Evangellic
    Joined