Jump to content





Photo
* - - - - 3 votes

would you pay chud more than rivera?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
61 replies to this topic

#1 Donald LaFell

Donald LaFell

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 29-July 11
  • posts: 2,092
  • Reputation: 444
SUPPORTER

Posted 02 June 2012 - 03:36 PM

I would.

There are managers woho pay contractors more than their own salary. I dont think it'd be ridiculous if we ended up having to pay chud more to stay as an oc.

Rivera's a defensive coach so it helps to have a really competent oc that allows rivera to concentrate on dc.

I hate that we lost del rio all those years ago. If we're willing to pay our homegrown talent so much then we should pay our successful coaches whatever it takes to keep them.

Kind of unlikely though, if chud makes more rivera will probably get a raise too.

#2 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,262
  • Reputation: 5,361
Moderators

Posted 02 June 2012 - 03:39 PM

Chud is overrated around these parts. Cam is just that good.

#3 jtnc

jtnc

    Resident Asshole

  • Joined: 28-November 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 13,662
  • Reputation: 3,664
HUDDLER

Posted 02 June 2012 - 03:41 PM

No. If he leaves after this season, he leaves. You do know it's not ONLY about the money, some coaches just want to move on to bigger things and run their own ship.

#4 Ivan The Awesome

Ivan The Awesome

    Keep Pounding...all the way to...the draft! :D

  • Joined: 11-May 11
  • posts: 10,128
  • Reputation: 2,848
SUPPORTER

Posted 02 June 2012 - 03:43 PM

Wow, talk about premature talks.

#5 TheRed

TheRed

    California Dreamin'

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 15,456
  • Reputation: 8,376
HUDDLER

Posted 02 June 2012 - 04:14 PM

Likely wouldn't come down to just money.

Any team that has to resort to paying a coordinator more than a head coach has failed.

Besides, chud needs to be consistently good. He had one good year in Cleveland as an OC and one here in nonetheless still a losing season. Let's see how next year plays out first.

#6 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,752
  • Reputation: 8,000
Moderators

Posted 02 June 2012 - 04:25 PM

no. i'd give them both raises to keep them around.

and saying that chud is overrated around here.....meh. players seems to talk about him just as highly but whatever. huddle experts know all.

#7 panthers34

panthers34

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 07-March 10
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 913
  • Reputation: 135
HUDDLER

Posted 02 June 2012 - 04:31 PM

chud is a huge reason why cam has success along with the other players we have on the offense

#8 Ken

Ken

    Triple Threat

  • Joined: 20-December 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,913
  • Reputation: 964
HUDDLER

Posted 02 June 2012 - 04:34 PM

Is Chud more important than Rivera, the HC? NO.
Though Chud has done a wonderful job of using Cam's abilities, Cam can be succesfull w/o Chud. There will be a number of OCs willing and potentially able of have the same success with Cam.

We all know how important HC's are around the league. Having a great HC and QB goes a long way in this league. So far Rivera seems to have all the qualities of being a great HC.

Paying an OC more than a HC just to keep the OC seems like a panic move and unbecoming of a good, strong franchise.

#9 La Pantera

La Pantera

    humpin' habanero

  • Joined: 22-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,863
  • Reputation: 802
HUDDLER

Posted 02 June 2012 - 04:39 PM

No.

#10 TheRed

TheRed

    California Dreamin'

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 15,456
  • Reputation: 8,376
HUDDLER

Posted 02 June 2012 - 04:40 PM

Chud is not overrated. He did wonders for cam clearly, and I definitely believe he is a good OC.

Let's be honest here though. John fox and his cronies never gave two shits about grooming a quarterback or playing to their strengths. When rivera and chud came in that was like some strange concept from outer space compared to what we had on staff previously.

#11 Udogg

Udogg

    Cardiac Victim since 95

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,689
  • Reputation: 1,648
HUDDLER

Posted 02 June 2012 - 04:49 PM

Cam makes Chud look really really good. If you think we would have the same success with Clausen or Anderson or 85% of the other QB's in the league then you are wrong. However he had done a good job. But paying him more than the HC? No I think that just stupid. That's creating a Mike Martz situation.

#12 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,752
  • Reputation: 8,000
Moderators

Posted 02 June 2012 - 05:02 PM

Is Chud more important than Rivera, the HC? NO.
Though Chud has done a wonderful job of using Cam's abilities, Cam can be succesfull w/o Chud. There will be a number of OCs willing and potentially able of have the same success with Cam.

We all know how important HC's are around the league. Having a great HC and QB goes a long way in this league. So far Rivera seems to have all the qualities of being a great HC.

Paying an OC more than a HC just to keep the OC seems like a panic move and unbecoming of a good, strong franchise.

would the next OC be as good with cam and use his talents as well? maybe...maybe not. why mess with a good thing? if it ain't broke, don't f*ck it up.

do what it takes to keep him around. the next OC might try to get cam to fit into a mold he shouldn't or won't give him a system to play in that brings out the best in him and the rest of the players in the offense.