Jump to content




Photo
- - - - -

ESPN selects Cam Newton's 2010 college season

Cam Newton College Football Superlatives

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
61 replies to this topic

#37 Chimera

Chimera

    Not Bant

  • Joined: 11-November 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,147
  • Reputation: 2,966
HUDDLER

Posted 06 June 2012 - 11:06 AM

And spamming the comments section of Cam articles because people hate losing to black QBs is? Why are dudes so weak and insecure like that? Its sad man, Id hate myself if I was that cowardly.


So what do you call it when we troll a facebook page for a Saints* event? Is that because the QB is black too?

The only thing I'm seeing from you is that the only reason you care about Cam or Vick is because the color of their skin.

#38 carolinarolls

carolinarolls

    Mel's brother Del

  • Joined: 03-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,459
  • Reputation: 451
HUDDLER

Posted 06 June 2012 - 11:06 AM

According to the Federal Indictment he did: http://www.thesmokin...ndicted?page=16

Is that fact enough for you?


indictment = accusation

not proof of anything



wow

#39 BBQ&Beer

BBQ&Beer

    The good actor

  • Joined: 20-April 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,965
  • Reputation: 716
HUDDLER

Posted 06 June 2012 - 11:16 AM

And spamming the comments section of Cam articles because people hate losing to black QBs is? Why are dudes so weak and insecure like that? Its sad man, Id hate myself if I was that cowardly.


Most of the spamming seems to be coming from fans of other SEC teams. "Black QB" isn't the reason they're whining.

#40 carolinarolls

carolinarolls

    Mel's brother Del

  • Joined: 03-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,459
  • Reputation: 451
HUDDLER

Posted 06 June 2012 - 11:26 AM

I wish that in the way the powers that be changed "Saints*" into "Saints**" we could change "black QB" into "the member who authored this thread is a soft-shelled jackass"

#41 DirtyMagic97

DirtyMagic97

    YNWA

  • Joined: 04-December 09
  • posts: 7,006
  • Reputation: 1,186
SUPPORTER

Posted 06 June 2012 - 11:29 AM

I don't want to come off as defending Vick. I've never really been a fan. This comment however is how one might define the words "irresponsible" or "defaming".

Vick owned the house and it is unknown just how much he knew about these acts when you discuss having the dog fights all the way to the horrific ways the wounded or "weaker" animals were disposed of. I think if it had been proven that he was flipping the switch or holding the animals under water he would never see another day in the NFL much less be close to seeing freedom again.

He is guilty and he is a scumbag but nobody believes this guy was the trigger man or had anything to do with how the animals were destroyed. Maybe he did, maybe he didn't, but that has not been proven and it's pretty reckless to hang that on the guy like he was grinning in the crowd while these things happened or like it was all his personal doing.


Didn't Vick admit to agreeing to the hanging of 6-8 dogs that underperformed?

#42 carolinarolls

carolinarolls

    Mel's brother Del

  • Joined: 03-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,459
  • Reputation: 451
HUDDLER

Posted 06 June 2012 - 11:35 AM

Didn't Vick admit to agreeing to the hanging of 6-8 dogs that underperformed?


not that I ever heard. If so, then he should still be behind bars IMO. Anyway, people "admit" all sorts of things in court despite whether it happened or not or if there is any proof or not. Deals are deals and to admit something as part of a deal typically means there is no proof of what you are admitting to. If there were, no admission would be necessary.

Plus agreeing to the hanging off dogs and "electrocuting and drowning dogs for amusement" is quite different.

#43 DirtyMagic97

DirtyMagic97

    YNWA

  • Joined: 04-December 09
  • posts: 7,006
  • Reputation: 1,186
SUPPORTER

Posted 06 June 2012 - 11:39 AM

Plus agreeing to the hanging off dogs and "electrocuting and drowning dogs for amusement" is quite different.


They are different, but I can't say it's not as bad. Funding the operation, facilitating the venue, and agreeing to that torture is just as bad. Just because he wanted to keep his hands as clean as possible doesn't mean it's not as bad as actually doing it.

#44 carolinarolls

carolinarolls

    Mel's brother Del

  • Joined: 03-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,459
  • Reputation: 451
HUDDLER

Posted 06 June 2012 - 12:08 PM

They aren't different, but I can't say it's not as bad. Funding the operation, facilitating the venue, and agreeing to that torture is just as bad. Just because he wanted to keep his hands as clean as possible doesn't mean it's not as bad as actually doing it.


I see your point and I agree with you. I don't see this as a mastermind of the conspiracy situation though. This guy owned a house. That is the only thing ever proven against him personally. In the house he owned lots of hanus poo went down. In the case of pulling a trigger under orders from a mob boss, yeah the guy is dead and he who gave the order is guilty just like the trigger puller. It goes a bit further when you talk about this kind of cruelty. Kinda like most "hit men" would have issues with killing a kid or a woman, it takes a sick person to do what was done to these animals. I just can't see Vick ever being in the league again if there was ever any proof or real evidence that pointed to him actually "doing the deed".

Are both parties guilty? Of course. Are they both guilty of doing the same thing. I don't think so. I may be wrong about that.

#45 Jesse

Jesse

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 30-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,440
  • Reputation: 433
HUDDLER

Posted 06 June 2012 - 12:24 PM

Hey this isn't a topic of race, but I'll make it anyways.

#46 King Taharqa

King Taharqa

    The Panthers Quarterback

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,774
  • Reputation: 322
HUDDLER

Posted 06 June 2012 - 12:58 PM

So what do you call it when we troll a facebook page for a Saints*** event? Is that because the QB is black too?


I call being a lame ass with too much free time on your hands. If you had a life you wouldnt have time to worry about the Saints**.

The only thing I'm seeing from you is that the only reason you care about Cam or Vick is because the color of their skin.


The only reason you care about Chuck Norris and Jerry Richardson is the color of their skin. If they were arabic muslims, you wouldnt have Chuck in your avy and you wouldnt pull for Jerry's team.

#47 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,262
  • Reputation: 5,361
Moderators

Posted 06 June 2012 - 01:01 PM

Vick hate has nothing to do with skin color or style of play...

1. He was the Falcon QB. Explains Panther hate

2. NFL attempted to make him the face of the league at one point....he was never good enough for the hype

#48 AppStatePanther

AppStatePanther

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 01-January 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,794
  • Reputation: 219
HUDDLER

Posted 06 June 2012 - 01:01 PM

Can he get banned already. I'm so damn tired of getting on here to get told im scared of black qbs, or rich black people. Then he whines when MRTD uses racial undertones.