30 replies to this topic

[NanuqoftheNorth]

Thank god we have patriotic billionaires around to donate massive amounts of money to campaigns of their choosing and save us from Obama's "socialization" of America. Can you imagine how heartbreaking it would be to see any one person with undue power tipping the scales to undermine the basic tenets of democracy?

Sheldon Adelson

http://www.usnews.co...n-to-beat-obama

http://www.indecisio...ennis-diclaudio

[PhillyB]

lol

[cookinwithgas]

Glad to see a private citizen willing to sacrifice for the love of his country

[g5jamz]

Someone has to offset the unions.

Besides...since when does money guarantee a win.

[Tensor]

Someone has to offset the unions.

Besides...since when does money guarantee a win.

lol

[I Registered To Post This]

Someone has to offset the unions.

Besides...since when does money guarantee a win.

unions v. billionaires

i wonder who would win

[Panthro]

Bet he could open up a bunch of health clinics in lower served areas with the money he's wasting.

[g5jamz]

Ideas win. Change wins. And since when are liberals getting butthurt over something like this while getting their kneepads out everytime Soros wants to start another venture to undermine the political process (using language you guys like to use).

[g5jamz]

Oh lawls...a billionaire is putting money into an election.

[mmmbeans]

ideas win... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.



campaign finance reform.

[Tensor]

Ideas win. Change wins. And since when are liberals getting butthurt over something like this while getting their kneepads out everytime Soros wants to start another venture to undermine the political process (using language you guys like to use).

Conservatives have neither ideas or change.

The republican party is a party whose entire platform is trying to stay frozen in a revisionist past. When baby boomers die, the republican party is fuged.

[g5jamz]

Conservatives have neither ideas or change.

The republican party is a party whose entire platform is trying to stay frozen in a revisionist past. When baby boomers die, the republican party is fuged.

That's hilarious. What revisionist past. Obama loves to claim that he was handed the toughest economy since the great depression. Yet...when making claims of reducing deficit=fail, or unemployment=fail, or improved education=fail, or tax burden on middle class=fail (if he doesn't avoid taxmageddon), or yadda yadda... YET....he had House/Senate up until Jan 2011 and still couldn't get crap done, other than his legacy. Legacy superceded what people's main concerns are. But it's all about Obama.

Find me a state that's run by democrats at the state level that has a booming economy where there credit rating has been reduced.

Illinois...lol.
California...super lol

Heck...you can look to cities that are farked as well.

The next time Obama mentions the failed policies of the past, Romney should just say sure...let's look at that on the state level. Make it a national mandate on liberal policies and let's really see how people vote.

[g5jamz]

As for the money...Sex and the City parties, Hollywood productions, Soros, and an organization that makes the bulk of its money off of forced donations from workers ...and you're worried about one guy.

How fickle are liberals nowadays.

[cookinwithgas]

OK you say "what revisionist past" and change the subject.

Health Care reform was needed, could have been done a lot better if the Republicans had acted like grown ups, and is intended to reduce government spending as shown repeatedly by the CBO. It will be his legacy, but that's not why it was done you dolt. It was done because no other President was able to do it and it needed to get done.

He loves making the claim BECAUSE ITS TRUE and all the "wah Obama blames Bush wah" crap is just you being you. There's no doubt that we are no longer sliding into oblivion - this is why whiners like you vote for the guys that say "deficits don't matter" when there are wars to fight and rich people to coddle, yet deficits are the most evil thing in the world when generated to save the fuging country from another Great Depression.

This recovery has ALWAYS been characterized by every economist with half a brain as being slow, painful, jobless, etc - NOTHING to do with Obama, or tax cuts, or whatever - it's just what it is and the government can only shepherd it UNLESS it decides to spend more money on it which clearly you feel is not going to help - despite all evidence to the contrary - so yes it will continue to be slow and sputtering. Romney sure is not going to be able to do anything different about it.

The problem here is that all Romney can do is talk about doing all the things we were doing before that helped create this mess because the Republican platform is inflexible and relies on a completely failed stategy as dogma in order to keep it's base happy. The government has been tied to the economy closely since the Fed was created and although it's had it's issues, it also created the greatest economic powerhouse on the planet. The idea that somehow now you can divest the union in order to make things go better has been shown to be a failure but this does not sit well with some folks who can't seem to differentiate 'government oversight" with "socialist Obama taking over everything" or whatever other silly excuse is in vogue this week.

[mav1234]

The next time Obama mentions the failed policies of the past, Romney should just say sure...let's look at that on the state level. Make it a national mandate on liberal policies and let's really see how people vote.

Or you could just ask Governor Kasich, who pretty much said Obama should get all the credit for job growth in his state (since it mostly has been in the auto industry).