Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Whiny ass Vilma storms out of appeal hearing like a lil' be-atch

41 posts in this topic

Posted · Report post

http://m.newser.com/article/d9vfkjco3/vilma-leaves-nfl-appeals-hearing-complaining-the-process-is-unfair.html

Suck it up and be a man Vilma, you piece of sh*t Saint. He cries more than the lame ass Taint fans. Eat sh*t New Orleans.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

don't lie to the man.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

my-pussy-hurts1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

too freaking funny. What the hell did he expect?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Tidbit from Florio about evidence presented by the NFL (link)

A slide prepared by Williams to illustrate “assessing the opponent.”

This slide features an image of the reality television character “Dog the Bounty Hunter,” and includes the phrase “Now its time to do our job…collect bounty$$$!” along with “No apologies! Let’s go Hunting!”

Ummmm, yeah. Well...I'm sure he only meant that as a joke, right? :unsure:

The Players Association response?

The NFLPA document refers to it as “a poorly chosen and ironic example to use but life plays havoc on us at times.”

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Seriously, from here on out anytime I get caught doing something I shouldn't, my defense is going to be "Life plays havoc on us at times.”

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Seriously...

Two things I see here...

1) The NFL isn't releasing evidence like they should... don't know why.

2) The NFLPA and the players involved are playing coy and acting innocent but not protesting really anything but the fact that the NFL hasn't released the evidence... they did it, they know they did it... Gregg Williams, dirtbag that he is admitted it, and now they're just playing this game.

Why isn't Payton protesting his suspension? Hmmm... Loomis isn't either... Hmmmm...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Realistically speaking, the NFL could release everything they have, plus video of Jonathan Vilma's $10,000 dollar offer and recordings of Gregg Williams discussing specific bounties, and this bunch would still say they weren't convinced.

Their defense strategy essentially boils down to this...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Didn't the NFL say they would release all the evidence after the players appeals process is over?

I don't really understand why they don't just get it over with now and put the nail in this coffin. I'm so sick of hearing these idiots proclaim innocence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I think our old buddy Darin Gantt might have uncovered the real reason Vilma walked out (link)

Exhibit 10 might be the the closest thing to a smoking gun among the nearly 200 pages presented, showing a ledger from the “Minny game” which shows Jonathan Vilma and Charles Grant apparently collecting $10,000 each, and assistant head coach Joe Vitt apparently contributing $5,000 to the “QB out pool.”

It's a common tactic. You know they've got you and you can't really answer back, so you duck out and act indignant at the whole process just to try and save your public face.

There are at least some indications that the others see the writing on the wall and are ready to just "take their medicine" but not Vilma, who at this point is really coming off like a total POS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Seriously...

Two things I see here...

1) The NFL isn't releasing evidence like they should... don't know why.

2) The NFLPA and the players involved are playing coy and acting innocent but not protesting really anything but the fact that the NFL hasn't released the evidence... they did it, they know they did it... Gregg Williams, dirtbag that he is admitted it, and now they're just playing this game.

Why isn't Payton protesting his suspension? Hmmm... Loomis isn't either... Hmmmm...

Payton and Loomis have years and years left. Vilma was on his last leg. Makes sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

@AdamSchefter

NFL showed slides from Saints* computers on 1/7/11,saying: "Now's the time to do our jobs, collect bounty $. No apologies. Let's go hunting."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

The slide in question...

post-202-0-92456900-1340057015_thumb.jpg

All 200 pages of the evidence presented today can be downloaded in PDF form here (NFLPA) and a pretty good summary article from Saints* reporter Jeff Duncan can be found here (NOLA.com).

Excerpt:

The evidence the NFL used in its hearings with Saints* players in the bounty probe and released today by the NFL Players Association is pretty damning for the Saints*, who in recent weeks have vociferously denied a bounty program existed with the team.

You'd have to be pretty naïve - or a blindly devoted fan -- to not believe a program existed after reviewing the evidence in its entirety.

It's clear from the evidence presented today - and remember the league is believed to have even more in its possession -- the Saints* had a pay-for-performance and pay-for-injury program administered by coaches and conducted by players.

And, please, don't get derailed by semantics here. All that matters to the NFL is the existence of a pay-for-performance and/or pay-for-injury program.

The NFL doesn't have to have proof of bounty money being paid to a defensive player for intentionally injuring an opponent, or for knocking an opponent out of a game, whether intentional or not. The NFL has to show that a bounty was offered. They don't have to prove anything more.

So all of this reviewing of game tape to see if players injured opponents or delivered cheap shots is a waste of time. It's irrelevant.

Like conspiracy to commit robbery, all that's required for a person to be considered guilty is for those involved to know of the planand to take some action toward its completion. The robbery itself need not be committed.

In this case, the existence of a bounty program administered by coaches and condoned by team officials is a major violation of league rules.

Kind of fascinating to see something from the internal workings of an NFL team, even if it's the Saints* :unsure:

Man, were they ever idiots to keep records on this stuff :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites