So your arguement is science..... you talking about reptiles/ amphibians what ever that have the ability to NATURALLY change sexs... how many men you seen grow female reproductive organs (birth defects aside). I've heard of females growing there clitoris out into a penis with the help of docters/ hormones/ testosterone.. not NATURAL.
He didn't say anything about animals changing sexes. He was referring to same-sex attraction amongst other animals, which occurs in 1,500 to 2,000 known species. Regardless, that's an irrelevant argument and doesn't change things one way or another, just a response to the tired "unnatural" argument.
Eyeglasses and synthetic fibres are not natural either. That's not a valid argument in prohibiting something. If we only accepted natural things we would still live like animals like they did in biblical times.
Secondly them telling A man he can't filter his kids knowledge of the morality of Homosexuality isn't the same thing your' accusing Christianity of?
First of all, he can. He can put his child in a religious school that teaches what he wants. Teaching an acceptance of same-sex attraction is not a religious teaching. It's a social thing that you are the one applying your religion to, thus it has absolutely nothing to do with the freedom of religion as it pertains to the first amendment.
I personally don't think 'teaching' acceptance of black people or white people or gay people or anyone is something that needs to be done in schools, but simply on grounds that it's a waste of time, not because of your imagined right to shield your kid from an idea because of your religion.
His religious freedem in the 1st admendment says he should be able to stop his son from being taught that what he knows as sin is ok. IS THAT NOT WHY THE BIBLE WAS TAKEN OUT OF SCHOOL? Its funny how things work one way now-a-days.
No, it doesn't say that. Like I addressed in my last comment, you don't have the right to use your religion to dictate what is taught in school when it's not a religious discussion. It's a discussion about same-sex attraction, not religion. If you arbitrarily decide that math is against your religion, you don't have the right to prevent it from being taught, only to remove
your child from that school and put her in one that teaches what you want.
Answer that what is the difference? The Bible offends some... well Homosexuality offends others WHY IS THAT DIFFERENT?
The difference is that nobody is trying to ban christian marriage.
Me not so much I just know its not right. I just can't help but loling(and I apoloogize) at your insistance that science approves of a same gender choice in which a species can't procreate.
Being gay doesn't make a person sterile. They can procreate.
hmm why don't gay rights advocates push for a legal binding thats not called marriage? Just some kind of benifit w/ taxes and healthcare you know why? Because it is a direct attack on christianity and the bible. Plain and simple
This may come as a shock to you, but christians didn't invent marriage, and it existed before the bible was written. In fact,
gay marriage existed before the Bible was written. They are traditional and commonplace and accepted throughout ancient history. Cicero wrote extensively on the subject, mentioning several gay marriages between men, including some of the first Emperors. Same-sex marriage didn't start being banned until Christianity took control of (and subsequently collapsed) Rome. They were also common in China and in the Norse countries.
Christians are not the center of the universe. They are not the most popular religion in the world, they are not the oldest, and not everything is about your religion. Life existed before it, and it will exist after it. Christianity is absolutely irrelevant to homosexuals or their rights.
