Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Cat

Creationism in Private Schools

227 posts in this topic

WE NEED TO DISCUSS THE CONTROVERSY! of Jews being killed by fire breathing dinos since it can't be "proved" that they didn't do it, disguised as Nazis.

After all the devil would totally use fire breating dinos disguised as Nazis to do his dirty work

i agree. teach the controversy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it a falsehood to say so?

Saying "some people believe" whatever does not constitute endorsement, just an acknowledgement of fact.

No but wtf should a school be made to waste time mentioning that not everyone believes exactly what's being taught? Seems like a waste of time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No

but in what scenario would this matter? Are you talking in regards to science? Are you suggesting the Bible is scientific evidence?

No scenario, really. Just a response to Biscuit's question about whether a Christian scientist can be objective. Point being that lack of religious belief doesn't equal objectivity. Everyone has their preconceived notions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No but wtf should a school be made to waste time mentioning that not everyone believes exactly what's being taught? Seems like a waste of time.

If "everyone" has to believe it, then how do you justify teaching evolution?

Or does it only have to be believed by "the people that matter"?

Heck, if "everyone" has to believe something for it to be acceptable, how do you teach social studies at all?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It still amazes me that we've created a worldwide internet meant to share information and make everyone more informed on things, and spend bandwidth on crap like this and TMZ.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is an atheist who believes nothing in the Bible could possibly be true "objective"?

Do you honestly think anybody comes to the table completely devoid of preconceived notions?

Oh plenty of people have pre-conceived notions, no question... but if someone truly believes something and their belief is by nature contrary to what they are studying, which do they follow?

Obviously not all christians believe in the literal interpretations of genesis, and obviously some scientists can study science without mixing in their own personal religious beliefs, but that no doubt makes it harder for them to be completely objective in my opinion.

Straight ahead answer folks. Tell me what's factually incorrect about this statement:

"Some people believe that a higher power exists, and that this higher power created everything."

If there's nothing factually incorrect about that, then what's the big deal about saying that in a classroom?

You don't have to teach the Bible, don't have to say the name "God", don't have to mention any specific religion, none of it. All you have to do is make the above statement, and you've acknowledged intelligent design.

Explain to me the big deal about that.

Nothing wrong with stating it, but that statement is really a religious issue... it has no more place in a science class than stating "some people believe that aliens seeded the earth with life"... OK, some people believe it... so what? Should that be said too? What beliefs should be stated in science class? Seems that if you give all of that equal billing with science, then class would get mighty long...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait, you mean the acknowledgement of religious theories didn't turn you all into zealots?

Impossible! :wacko:

Everyone knows you can't even talk about the existence of religion or you'll mess with everybody's head!

Well, the discussion was mainly about evolution. I don't know who became atheist after the discussion or who remained religious but still acknowledged evolution.

My parents made my sister and I go through confirmation class in 7th grade at a Presbyterian Church. When we were taught, there was little mention of religion from any of the teachers. They just wanted to show that the Bible was meant to teach morality and wanted us to become good people in the way society describes 'good'.

The only time we got really into Religion was when this one teacher would make us play Bible Jeopardy and we had to come up with insane references from certain books.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh plenty of people have pre-conceived notions, no question... but if someone truly believes something and their belief is by nature contrary to what they are studying, which do they follow?

Obviously not all christians believe in the literal interpretations of genesis, and obviously some scientists can study science without mixing in their own personal religious beliefs, but that no doubt makes it harder for them to be completely objective in my opinion.

Nothing wrong with stating it, but that statement is really a religious issue... it has no more place in a science class than stating "some people believe that aliens seeded the earth with life"... OK, some people believe it... so what? Should that be said too? What beliefs should be stated in science class? Seems that if you give all of that equal billing with science, then class would get mighty long...

Not really true. There are non-religious theories of intelligent design out there as well.

Would you suggest that a scientist deny that any and all alternative explanations - regardless of who or how many people believe them or what other interpretations of evidence exists - are completely and utterly impossible?

If so, is that teaching science, or orthodoxy?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If "everyone" has to believe it, then how do you justify teaching evolution?

Or does it only have to be believed by "the people that matter"?

Heck, if "everyone" has to believe something for it to be acceptable, how do you teach social studies at all?

Who said everyone has to believe it? I don't think I'm sure what you're saying.

Maybe you are questioning why experts in the field of studies are the ones who determine what should be taught in school....??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who said everyone has to believe it? I don't think I'm sure what you're saying.

You did.

No but wtf should a school be made to waste time mentioning that not everyone believes exactly what's being taught? Seems like a waste of time.

If we can only acknowledge those things that "everyone" believes and not even allow that alternative theories exist, then "education" starts to look an awful lot like indoctrination.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • WaPo isn't partners with the CIA. Amazon Web Services, which sells servers to thousands upon thousands of companies and websites, sold servers to the CIA. You can buy your own now right here. Does that make you partners with the WaPo? https://aws.amazon.com When Jimmy Dore says "600 million dollars is more than the Washington Post is even worth!" he's being a dumbass. The Washington Post didn't make the deal with the CIA so what they're worth is irrelevant. Amazon Web Services sold them servers, and they happen to have the same parent company as the Washington Post. The thing about Jimmy Dore is that he is absolutely utterly obsessed with Hillary Clinton. Like, utterly obsessed. Everything goes back to Hillary Clinton to him, and his obsession has morphed into skepticism of the Russian investigation, because he views it as an excuse for why Hillary lost. He can't accept the Russia stuff being true because if it's true then maybe Clinton didn't lose on merit. And so his skepticism of the Russia investigation has led him down the path of 'well the Deep State is conspiring against Trump' and 'the Deep State is the real true evil.' He fact-checks nothing. It's Alex Jones level poo.
    • Anyone who can equate any modern presidency at any moment in time with the embarrassment we see right now is off their gd rocker. What is really telling is that we now see that Trump can't just be casual.  He can't just talk it up with other peers.  He can't just chill the f*ck out. Seriously....people like this are weird as hell.   It's been obvious he's the head of a business but not a business savvy guy since the Apprentice.  I don't understand why we want the Sharknado meets 80s bad guy of Presidents.