Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Saints* suspensions upheld


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
125 replies to this topic

#1 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 44,772
  • Reputation: 13,322
SUPPORTER

Posted 03 July 2012 - 03:02 PM

Roger Goodell upholds suspensions for Saints* players in bounty scandal

Anybody shocked?

#2 Peppers90 NC

Peppers90 NC

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 03-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,408
  • Reputation: 1,702
HUDDLER

Posted 03 July 2012 - 03:03 PM

Saints* fans

#3 Jase

Jase

    Kuechold Fantasies

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 17,907
  • Reputation: 6,254
Administrators

Posted 03 July 2012 - 03:04 PM

bountymas: the holiday that keeps on giving.

#4 Mvp2014

Mvp2014

    Phenom

  • Joined: 06-October 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,897
  • Reputation: 331
HUDDLER

Posted 03 July 2012 - 03:06 PM

Yeeaaaa. Suckers

#5 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 44,772
  • Reputation: 13,322
SUPPORTER

Posted 03 July 2012 - 03:06 PM

Story Links:

PFT: Goodell upholds suspensions for Vilma, Hargrove, Smith, Fujita

ESPN: NFL rejects Bounty Appeals


And get your laughs here...

Saints* Report Response Thread

#6 Inimicus

Inimicus

    Life is better in a kayak

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 6,423
  • Reputation: 1,212
SUPPORTER

Posted 03 July 2012 - 03:06 PM

http://nfllabor.file...atter-2-doc.pdf

Although you claimed to have been ‘wrongfully accused with insufficient evidence,’ your lawyers elected not to ask a single question of the principal investigators, both of whom were present at the hearing (as your lawyers had requested); you elected not to testify or to make any substantive statement, written or oral, in support of your appeal; you elected not to call a single witness to support your appeal; and you elected not to introduce a single exhibit addressing the merits of your appeal. Instead, your lawyers raised a series of jurisdictional and procedural objections that generally ignore the CBA, in particular its provisions governing ‘conduct detrimental’ determinations…”


Beat me to it Mr Scot...

Looking for the delete button...

#7 TheRed

TheRed

    California Dreamin'

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 14,921
  • Reputation: 7,768
HUDDLER

Posted 03 July 2012 - 03:07 PM

Only people shocked are the suspended players and the Saints** fans.

I just want to stop hearing about this bullshit already and watch some football.

#8 KendrickPanther

KendrickPanther

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 21-March 12
  • posts: 8,985
  • Reputation: 4,851
SUPPORTER

Posted 03 July 2012 - 03:08 PM

Good, now its on to the next phase. Hopefully the courts expedite this process. The Starcaps suspensions were a damned joke.

#9 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 44,772
  • Reputation: 13,322
SUPPORTER

Posted 03 July 2012 - 03:10 PM

Michael David Smith thinks Goodell may be willing to reduce suspensions if players give him a reason to do so (link)

In the league’s announcement about Goodell upholding the suspensions of Saints* linebacker Jonathan Vilma, Packers defensive end Anthony Hargrove, Saints* defensive end Will Smith and Browns linebacker Scott Fujita, a portion of the letter from Goodell to the players indicates that the commissioner still wants to hear from the players and is committed to listening to what they have to say.

“While this decision constitutes my final and binding determination under the CBA, I of course retain the inherent authority to reduce a suspension should facts be brought to my attention warranting the exercise of that discretion,” Goodell wrote to the players. “The record confirms that each of you was given multiple chances to meet with me to present your side of the story. You are each still welcome to do so.”


How much would you like to bet that one of the conditions for such reduction would be public confession?

#10 Peppers90 NC

Peppers90 NC

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 03-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,408
  • Reputation: 1,702
HUDDLER

Posted 03 July 2012 - 03:14 PM

one odd statement: "you elected not to call a single witness to support your appeal"

not sure if this makes sense, but how could you call a witness to something that supposedly didnt happen? If it didn't exist, how could there be any witnesses?