Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

Redskins letting RG3 run things over there


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
34 replies to this topic

#16 chef17

chef17

    Senior Asshole

  • Joined: 28-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,504
  • Reputation: 105
HUDDLER

Posted 11 July 2012 - 04:58 PM

So article says RG3 wants a WR, the Skins are unlikely to pick the WR, and you come to the conclusion that the Skins are letting him run things?

#17 iamhubby1

iamhubby1

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 13-June 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,720
  • Reputation: 1,130
HUDDLER

Posted 11 July 2012 - 05:06 PM

As a general rule I only hate teams in our Division, and teams we are about to play. But I will make an exception for the skins. I hate them with a long festering passion. So what the ... is this piece of crap thread doing on my Huddle? F the skins. F grits and his ilk. F any and all skins fans and wannabe fans.

Except for that ed romero dude. He can stay. But the rest, off with their heads is too good for them.

I hope we beat them so bad Child Protective Services will bring us up on charges. That skins fans revolt and burn the stadium down. We spank them so hard their grandchildren will feel it.

#18 PantherPhann89

PantherPhann89

    CPP "Carolina Panther Phann"

  • Joined: 25-June 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,535
  • Reputation: 424
HUDDLER

Posted 11 July 2012 - 05:09 PM

This guy has been getting a lot of hype lately. I doubt if we'll sign him....so I don't care if the Redskins does or not.

#19 CatMan72

CatMan72

    KEEP POUNDING

  • Joined: 04-January 09
  • posts: 15,617
  • Reputation: 2,828
SUPPORTER

Posted 11 July 2012 - 05:12 PM

Well, at least somebody is in charge.

#20 iamhubby1

iamhubby1

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 13-June 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,720
  • Reputation: 1,130
HUDDLER

Posted 11 July 2012 - 06:05 PM

Well, at least somebody is in charge.


Shh. Don't tell anyone. They may become relevant with a competent leader.

#21 pOpCoRnPoPpEr

pOpCoRnPoPpEr

    HUDDLER

  • Joined: 19-March 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,940
  • Reputation: 15
HUDDLER

Posted 11 July 2012 - 07:15 PM

hmm im just wondering, when did the huddle decide that they hated RGIII? are you just being little girls again?

lol, again??

#22 pOpCoRnPoPpEr

pOpCoRnPoPpEr

    HUDDLER

  • Joined: 19-March 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,940
  • Reputation: 15
HUDDLER

Posted 11 July 2012 - 07:17 PM

So article says RG3 wants a WR, the Skins are unlikely to pick the WR, and you come to the conclusion that the Skins are letting him run things?

Stop using your brains please...

#23 fieryprophet

fieryprophet

    WARNING: Do not annoy!

  • Joined: 15-December 08
  • posts: 5,441
  • Reputation: 5,683
SUPPORTER

Posted 11 July 2012 - 08:18 PM

Dammit, why'd you people have to bring up a topic that is so retarded you left me no choice but to agree with Grits?

#24 Lumps

Lumps

    Jase is butthurt

  • Joined: 20-October 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,912
  • Reputation: 1,009
HUDDLER

Posted 11 July 2012 - 08:24 PM

They pretty much have to. But, it is the smart the to do.

Not really a choice, they gave up their future for RG3 and their future depends on him. Failure will set them back 5 years. They nshould to let him run things and succeed or fail. Personally I think he will be a psoteseason QB but hard to say if he has SB winning elite potential. We shall see. Cam is way better and sexier no homo so doesn't matter rly.

#25 ickmule

ickmule

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 23-December 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,945
  • Reputation: 462
HUDDLER

Posted 11 July 2012 - 08:36 PM

Eff the Foreskins.

#26 Argus Plexus

Argus Plexus

    Super Kami Guru

  • Joined: 13-September 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,806
  • Reputation: 848
HUDDLER

Posted 11 July 2012 - 08:52 PM

Deadskins

#27 iamhubby1

iamhubby1

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 13-June 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,720
  • Reputation: 1,130
HUDDLER

Posted 11 July 2012 - 08:58 PM

Foreskins is funnier, but Deadskins is more PC

#28 4Corners

4Corners

    2014 Huddle Poster of the Year.

  • Joined: 07-January 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 15,185
  • Reputation: 1,720
HUDDLER

Posted 11 July 2012 - 09:02 PM

http://profootballta...ke-josh-gordon/


Wrong board homie

#29 Frizzy350

Frizzy350

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-January 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,490
  • Reputation: 621
HUDDLER

Posted 11 July 2012 - 10:02 PM

I'm not really sure why we get so many Redskins/RG3 threads on here...

Frankly I'm not surprised he'd like Gordon to play there, even though the redskins picked up some receivers none of them are even like... top 20 in the league. Pierre Garcon is nothing special at all and was easily the worst out of that Indy receiver trio. Josh Morgan is fairly solid but isn't exactly explosive. Eddie Royal is a pretty good player too, but he's not exactly a go up and get it receiver.

#30 rodeo

rodeo

    Keelah se'lai

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 16,924
  • Reputation: 4,949
HUDDLER

Posted 11 July 2012 - 10:28 PM

Foreskins is funnier, but Deadskins is more PC

I'm not sure if pc matters when you're talking about a team with a racist name anyway.