Redskins letting RG3 run things over there
Posted 11 July 2012 - 04:58 PM
Posted 11 July 2012 - 05:06 PM
Except for that ed romero dude. He can stay. But the rest, off with their heads is too good for them.
I hope we beat them so bad Child Protective Services will bring us up on charges. That skins fans revolt and burn the stadium down. We spank them so hard their grandchildren will feel it.
Posted 11 July 2012 - 05:09 PM
Posted 11 July 2012 - 06:05 PM
Well, at least somebody is in charge.
Shh. Don't tell anyone. They may become relevant with a competent leader.
Posted 11 July 2012 - 07:15 PM
hmm im just wondering, when did the huddle decide that they hated RGIII? are you just being little girls again?
Posted 11 July 2012 - 07:17 PM
Stop using your brains please...
So article says RG3 wants a WR, the Skins are unlikely to pick the WR, and you come to the conclusion that the Skins are letting him run things?
Posted 11 July 2012 - 08:18 PM
Posted 11 July 2012 - 08:24 PM
Not really a choice, they gave up their future for RG3 and their future depends on him. Failure will set them back 5 years. They nshould to let him run things and succeed or fail. Personally I think he will be a psoteseason QB but hard to say if he has SB winning elite potential. We shall see. Cam is way better and sexier no homo so doesn't matter rly.
Posted 11 July 2012 - 10:02 PM
Frankly I'm not surprised he'd like Gordon to play there, even though the redskins picked up some receivers none of them are even like... top 20 in the league. Pierre Garcon is nothing special at all and was easily the worst out of that Indy receiver trio. Josh Morgan is fairly solid but isn't exactly explosive. Eddie Royal is a pretty good player too, but he's not exactly a go up and get it receiver.
Posted 11 July 2012 - 10:28 PM
I'm not sure if pc matters when you're talking about a team with a racist name anyway.
Foreskins is funnier, but Deadskins is more PC
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users