Jump to content




Photo
- - - - -

Customer At Internet Cafe Shoots 2 Robbers


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
147 replies to this topic

#136 MadHatter

MadHatter

    The Only Voice of Reason

  • Joined: 30-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 20,095
  • Reputation: 5,600
HUDDLER

Posted 25 July 2012 - 07:28 AM

Liberals use any tragedy to try to further their agenda. No matter the tragedy, they are always thinking of how to benefit themselves. "new gun laws" is their mantra at the moment. In this case, who would have been limited in their behaviour by "new gun laws". The old man, thats who. The two young punks do not pay attention to anything on the books now, nor would they pay attention to new liberal gun laws.

The old man went through the law, passed the tests, had no record, and got his CC. Two young punks did none of that. They never will.


Exactly.

You will NOT keep criminals from breaking the law by passing more laws.....simple really. That is why they call them CRIMINALS....because they commit crimes.

#137 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 25,266
  • Reputation: 6,363
Moderators

Posted 25 July 2012 - 07:48 AM

Then let's do away with all laws. I mean these guys are going to commit crimes anyway.

#138 Kurb

Kurb

    I hit it.

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 13,783
  • Reputation: 4,524
Administrators

Posted 25 July 2012 - 07:55 AM

Then let's do away with all laws. I mean these guys are going to commit crimes anyway.


No laws and arm everyone.
Things will straighten out quickly.

When you run out of musket balls and black powder I will let you into my compound.
:D

#139 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 25,266
  • Reputation: 6,363
Moderators

Posted 25 July 2012 - 07:56 AM

No laws and arm everyone.
Things will straighten out quickly.

When you run out of musket balls and black powder I will let you into my compound.
:D


Sounds like a fun world to live in.

#140 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • Joined: 17-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,171
  • Reputation: 472
HUDDLER

Posted 25 July 2012 - 07:58 AM

Mass murder is against the law in Aurora right?

#141 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 25,266
  • Reputation: 6,363
Moderators

Posted 25 July 2012 - 08:02 AM

No point in having that law as it obviously does not deter crime.

#142 cantrell

cantrell

    secular progressive bogeyman

  • Joined: 16-May 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,447
  • Reputation: 3
HUDDLER

Posted 25 July 2012 - 05:48 PM

Poor Cantrell... he's like a Parrot that you teach one phrase to and then he just keeps repeating it over and over... can't read context and can't understand points that people make...

Posted Image


"Squaaawkk.... Silverware..."

"Squaaawkk... gun control..."

"Squaaawkk..."


i would just like to take this time to reiterate how fuging stupid it is to bring up "the danger of forks" in response to "the danger of guns"

i mean if you were at all capable of admitting that you were wrong to bring up forks in a debate over guns, i'd stop bringing it up and maybe, just maybe, people would forget that you're a complete dumbass

#143 Darth Biscuit

Darth Biscuit

    Dark Lord

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 34,761
  • Reputation: 8,774
HUDDLER

Posted 25 July 2012 - 06:03 PM

Squawk, Squawk parrot boy.

#144 cantrell

cantrell

    secular progressive bogeyman

  • Joined: 16-May 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,447
  • Reputation: 3
HUDDLER

Posted 25 July 2012 - 06:09 PM

maybe instead of trying to divert attention away from your stupid "point," you could, you know, explain the logic behind comparing forks to guns

#145 Darth Biscuit

Darth Biscuit

    Dark Lord

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 34,761
  • Reputation: 8,774
HUDDLER

Posted 25 July 2012 - 06:13 PM

maybe instead of trying to divert attention away from your stupid "point," you could, you know, explain the logic behind comparing forks to guns

Dude are u serious? I've already told you... Delhommey posted links about children getting hurt by guns, i posted links about kids being hurt by everyday objects, with my point being that if parents aren't responsible, kids can be hurt by lots of things.... Can u honestly not get that? Why must things be explained ad nauseam to you? You just get a kick out of being a douche instead of trying to have adult discussions...

#146 cantrell

cantrell

    secular progressive bogeyman

  • Joined: 16-May 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,447
  • Reputation: 3
HUDDLER

Posted 25 July 2012 - 06:16 PM

oh wow that's a hell of a point you're making there that, when taken to its logical conclusion, is in fact an argument in favor of the private ownership of surface to air missiles and tactical nukes, because PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY. the only difference being that a missile is more comparable to a gun than silverware is.

guns are designed to destroy things, forks aren't. the fact that you think this is an "adult discussion" says far more about you than it does about me.

#147 Darth Biscuit

Darth Biscuit

    Dark Lord

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 34,761
  • Reputation: 8,774
HUDDLER

Posted 25 July 2012 - 06:31 PM

That's the logical conclusion of someone that likes to see themselves type shiny letters onto a forum solely for the sake of typing... Wow, and you say I'm a dumbass...

Go ahead and have your last word, I'm done with your silliness.

#148 Kurb

Kurb

    I hit it.

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 13,783
  • Reputation: 4,524
Administrators

Posted 25 July 2012 - 08:31 PM

I was guilty of this myself I admit that.

But the personal attacks are going to stop.