Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Sean Payton's Vicodin

Multiple dead in TDKR showing

211 posts in this topic

Jason Alexander wants some royalties about the muskets comment.

He can check with my lawyer on who said it first

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would expect someone with a username like that to say something stupid regarding guns.

The difference is that 90% of people don't know how to make a bomb and there are regulations in place to keep people who do want to make bombs from getting the supplies. Any single person in the world can take a gun and kill people. My problem with guns are that they make it way too easy to kill a man and a person with minimal skill can cause a lot of damage with one. Just because our country was founded on a law doesn't mean that it has to stay that way forever. Back then we used black people as slaves and women as glorified sex toys that could cook, so I suppose you think that was right too?

I'm not saying we need to purge the entire country of guns, I'm saying that there's no fuging reason at all for people to be able to acquire fuging assault rifles.

Your opinion is what it is, your opinion. Good to know, what you eat don't make us poo. Im a grown man and don't need some child to tell me what I need and don't need to protect my house and my family. One day when you grow up and have kids and a family, you might be able to exercise some of those good ole opinions you have and they might even matter.

Something else to chew on. I've seena lot of comments about people on welfare and depending on the government. So, nobody see's the double standard. Let your government protect you and tell you how to live your life but don't let them feed your family if you are going through hardtimes. Make your minds up. Should gov. be more involved with your life or not?

WElfare/gun regulation=government, :rolleyes: same thing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jason Alexander wants some royalties about the muskets comment.

cmon pstall

There's still be guns. Calibers and types would be regulated.

Or you can have a musket....like the Constitution implied

I think if you want a gun it should be a muzzleloader.

Go kill 20 people with a musket. I mean that is the gun that was around in 1776....not an AR-15

RIGHTZ TO BEARS ARM!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the constitution also implies we should be able to bear arms to protect ourselves from an overbearing government

but just typing that out probably makes me a domestic terrorist

a dozen dead people and their loved ones realize now that when seconds count the police are minutes away

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seconds count when he has an AR-15....not when he has a musket.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL

Just L O L

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really fail to see how the type of weapon has any bearing on the situation.

So he couldn't have killed a dozen people with semiauto handguns and a shotgun?

C'mon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would expect someone with a username like that to say something stupid regarding guns.

The difference is that 90% of people don't know how to make a bomb and there are regulations in place to keep people who do want to make bombs from getting the supplies. Any single person in the world can take a gun and kill people. My problem with guns are that they make it way too easy to kill a man and a person with minimal skill can cause a lot of damage with one. Just because our country was founded on a law doesn't mean that it has to stay that way forever. Back then we used black people as slaves and women as glorified sex toys that could cook, so I suppose you think that was right too?

I'm not saying we need to purge the entire country of guns, I'm saying that there's no fuging reason at all for people to be able to acquire fuging assault rifles.

Exactly. Assault Rifles should be banned and ammo tracked. No one is carrying assault riffles around for protection. They are used as either toys, end of the world weapons or for insane killing ie: Colorado.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really fail to see how the type of weapon has any bearing on the situation.

So he couldn't have killed a dozen people with semiauto handguns and a shotgun?

C'mon.

Have you ever shot an AR-15? There is a difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really fail to see how the type of weapon has any bearing on the situation.

So he couldn't have killed a dozen people with semiauto handguns and a shotgun?

C'mon.

Blunderbusses and flintlock pistols

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm talking results here.

If I had a semiauto handgun in each hand and emptied them in to a crowd, then switched over to an autoloader shotgun...

c'mon cat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He killed 12 and injured 60ish. Equal results wouldn't have happened with a shotgun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites