Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

your starting LBing group and their starting positions


  • Please log in to reply
63 replies to this topic

Poll: your starting LBing group and their starting position (109 member(s) have cast votes)

whos your group

  1. Voted Kuechly-Beason-Anderson (71 votes [65.14%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 65.14%

  2. Kuechly-Beason-Davis (6 votes [5.50%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.50%

  3. Beason-Kuechly-Anderson (27 votes [24.77%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 24.77%

  4. Beason-Kuechly-Davis (1 votes [0.92%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 0.92%

  5. Davis-Beason-Anderson (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  6. Davis-Beason-Kuechly (3 votes [2.75%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 2.75%

  7. Davis-Kuechly-Anderson (1 votes [0.92%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 0.92%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#11 Argus Plexus

Argus Plexus

    Super Kami Guru

  • Joined: 13-September 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,800
  • Reputation: 845
  • LocationCape Fear Area
HUDDLER

Posted 20 July 2012 - 07:16 PM

Who in their right mind would bench the Beast for a rookie

#12 La Pantera

La Pantera

    humpin' habanero

  • Joined: 22-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,863
  • Reputation: 802
  • LocationWinston-Salem
HUDDLER

Posted 20 July 2012 - 07:22 PM

Who in their right mind would bench the Beast for a rookie


LOL...idk, but gallagher seemed to lean that direction,so I added the option.

#13 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,087
  • Reputation: 5,281
Moderators

Posted 20 July 2012 - 07:26 PM

Who in their right mind would bench the Beast for a rookie


Probably the team who drafted the best MLB prospect to come out in a LONG time will move him to OLB

Have you watched Luke? He is a natural and there is a reason Beason thought he was a more sure thing than Luck.....and most billed Luck as the most sure thing the NFL has seen in a decade

#14 Argus Plexus

Argus Plexus

    Super Kami Guru

  • Joined: 13-September 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,800
  • Reputation: 845
  • LocationCape Fear Area
HUDDLER

Posted 20 July 2012 - 07:46 PM

Probably the team who drafted the best MLB prospect to come out in a LONG time will move him to OLB

Have you watched Luke? He is a natural and there is a reason Beason thought he was a more sure thing than Luck.....and most billed Luck as the most sure thing the NFL has seen in a decade

I'd start the Beast before Davis or Anderson hands down. Then again I'd start the Beast in the middle with Kuech and Andy beside him.

#15 KillerKat

KillerKat

    To Hell With Bell

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 20,382
  • Reputation: 4,551
HUDDLER

Posted 20 July 2012 - 07:46 PM

Beason is not sitting on the bench dumbasses

#16 Jackofalltrades

Jackofalltrades

    OWN the Line of Scrimmage

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • posts: 18,653
  • Reputation: 6,636
  • LocationNC
SUPPORTER

Posted 20 July 2012 - 07:58 PM

I think we'll go into the regular season with Beason at Will, Luke at Mike and Anderson at Sam with Davis being situational, a 3-4 rush OLB in some packages.

#17 KendrickPanther

KendrickPanther

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 21-March 12
  • posts: 8,983
  • Reputation: 4,850
SUPPORTER

Posted 20 July 2012 - 08:38 PM

I'm not a linebacker guru but whichever position requires the most speed I would give to Kuechly. Also I would rest Beason a ton. Have him rotating out with TD.

#18 Beast_3000

Beast_3000

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 28-May 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 971
  • Reputation: 307
HUDDLER

Posted 20 July 2012 - 08:51 PM

Beason played the weak side ok, but he is stellar in the middle. Kuechly is just a very solidfootball player. He will flourish regardless of weak or middle. I think he will end up better than Beason, but because he is so athletic and injury free he will be best served as our weak side backer. Kuechly's coverage skills will strengthen our LB corps from the weak side. I find it funny how analyst forget just good Beason was in coverage. Anderson should start over Davis because of his durability. He isn't an All Pro backer but he is solid. In my opinion, Davis should be better served as a spark and on third and long replacing Anderson. Kuechly Beason & Davis on third down against this quarterback happy conference would be pretty amazing. They would really help our secondary underneath.

#19 ncsu12engr

ncsu12engr

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 24-April 12
  • posts: 275
  • Reputation: 78
SUPPORTER

Posted 20 July 2012 - 09:07 PM

I think our base 4-3 will be Kuechly - Beason - Anderson. Though with Beason still recovering from injury I could see Luke sliding over and playing some Mike and Davis coming in and sharing time with Beason. That is of course if Beason needs to take some plays off. Actually, it might be smarter to play Luke at Mike and let Beason and Davis rotate at Will.

#20 Marguide

Marguide

    South of the Border

  • Joined: 13-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,748
  • Reputation: 2,344
HUDDLER

Posted 20 July 2012 - 09:08 PM

I agree with JOAT. Luke should man the middle unless Beason shows a lot more in camp than seems reasonable, given his injury.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users