Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

If men have no say in abortion, why should they have to pay child support?

32 posts in this topic

Posted

Discuss.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I assume because child-rearing is a joint venture while chile-bearing is more of a solo mission

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I'm sure this is to be targetted more towards prochoice people.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

while chile-bearing is more of a solo mission

Freudian slip of the day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Since when has child support had anything to do with gender?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Not having a say in abortion sounds like a personal communication problem between you and your partner.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Not having a say in abortion sounds like a personal communication problem between you and your partner.

So is child support. It seems like people wringing their hands over this issue should work on being decent people rather than have government regulate what women are allowed to do because they can't handle their own poo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

What a great argument - government shouldn't regulate a woman's body. Wait, we're not talking about Obamacare?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

As a prolifer...I feel every child should have a father listed on their birth certificate (believe it or not...some women choose to leave it off because it used to be in their best interest in their minds - pre-90s welfare reform). Males are tracked and if they cannot provide x amount of minimum support for the children they procreate, they are forced to work for the state to cover their costs the state is having to pick up. Be it digging ditches, cleaning roadsides, etc.

No more of this crap like Dennis Rodman's dad.

Ridiculous and downright negligent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I assume because child-rearing is a joint venture while chile-bearing is more of a solo mission

welp looks like this thread was dealt with p quickly

gg mens rights activists

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

As a prolifer...I feel every child should have a father listed on their birth certificate (believe it or not...some women choose to leave it off because it used to be in their best interest in their minds - pre-90s welfare reform). Males are tracked and if they cannot provide x amount of minimum support for the children they procreate, they are forced to work for the state to cover their costs the state is having to pick up. Be it digging ditches, cleaning roadsides, etc.

No more of this crap like Dennis Rodman's dad.

Ridiculous and downright negligent.

I have never heard of leaving the father off the birth certificate because it was in the best interest of the mother for welfare.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

The father shoiuld be involved in every decision made regarding the child starting at conception.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites