Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Louis Murphy Interview on Mac Attack


  • Please log in to reply
47 replies to this topic

#41 Guest_Bwood_*

Guest_Bwood_*
Guests

Posted 29 July 2012 - 08:26 PM

Olsen was a disappointment last season. I don't care what the "NUMBERS" suggest, Shockey was much better.


How dare you speak of Olsen that way. Greg is practically our #3 receiver and his presence in our offense is irreplaceable.


it's all about the 'U'

#42 TheOracle

TheOracle

    Know-It-All

  • Joined: 28-August 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,457
  • Reputation: 20
HUDDLER

Posted 29 July 2012 - 08:36 PM

How dare you speak of Olsen that way. Greg is practically our #3 receiver and his presence in our offense is irreplaceable.


it's all about the 'U'


I don't care what he is, Shockey was a better player last year, regardless of the overall numbers for each. Touch Olsen and he'll either drop the pass, or immediately go down on contact. Shockey fought tackles, and played with fire. Olsen would've NEVER made that catch that Shockey did against the Bears where 3 Bears hit him at the same time.

Olsen's soft, and stiff. If he had Shockey's heart and physicality, he'd be a perennial Pro Bowler.

#43 Guest_Bwood_*

Guest_Bwood_*
Guests

Posted 29 July 2012 - 10:25 PM

I don't care what he is, Shockey was a better player last year, regardless of the overall numbers for each. Touch Olsen and he'll either drop the pass, or immediately go down on contact. Shockey fought tackles, and played with fire. Olsen would've NEVER made that catch that Shockey did against the Bears where 3 Bears hit him at the same time.

Olsen's soft, and stiff. If he had Shockey's heart and physicality, he'd be a perennial Pro Bowler.


Some great words to describe one of our teammates. I'll remember this post when Olsen is shredding the secondary like always.

#44 ubecool454

ubecool454

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 05-January 09
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 235
  • Reputation: 0
HUDDLER

Posted 29 July 2012 - 10:33 PM

How did you guys end up with Murphy. I sure was hoping the Texans could bring him to Houston. He is a great edition to the Panthers receiving corps.

#45 Guest_Bwood_*

Guest_Bwood_*
Guests

Posted 29 July 2012 - 10:36 PM

How did you guys end up with Murphy. I sure was hoping the Texans could bring him to Houston. He is a great edition to the Panthers receiving corps.


we essentially traded Jeff Otah to the Jets for a 7th, and then traded a 7th for Murphy. But the other way around, you get the point.

#46 ubecool454

ubecool454

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 05-January 09
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 235
  • Reputation: 0
HUDDLER

Posted 29 July 2012 - 10:45 PM

Got burried in the depth chart due to the WR talent in Okland.

The Raiders are thrown off. How do they not keep Murphy? He was banged up last year but he is IMO better than Heyward-Bey.

#47 jarhead

jarhead

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,632
  • Reputation: 995
  • Locationnear Charlotte
HUDDLER

Posted 30 July 2012 - 07:29 AM

I think a lot of people are writing Gettis off.

37 Rec , 508 yrds, and 3 Tds.

Now those arent great numbers, but if trending up they are. Add the fact his QBs that year were Clausen, Moore, and St. Pierre.

Lefell last year with Cam As QB had 36 Recs, 613 Yrds, and 3 tds.

*edit: Gettis also had Davidson as Oc. There is also that.



I disagree....I think him starting on PUP and the team not really knowing how his injury will effect his play is what the situation is

#48 TheOracle

TheOracle

    Know-It-All

  • Joined: 28-August 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,457
  • Reputation: 20
HUDDLER

Posted 30 July 2012 - 05:03 PM

Some great words to describe one of our teammates. I'll remember this post when Olsen is shredding the secondary like always.


Didn't do it last year. You can count the plays on one hand.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users