Jump to content


Photo
* * * * - 3 votes

8/3 Training Camp, Twitter Thread


  • Please log in to reply
79 replies to this topic

#31 KARASMATIC444

KARASMATIC444

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 918
  • Reputation: 233
HUDDLER

Posted 03 August 2012 - 03:45 PM

Yeah I know I'm just saying if he wants to start he needs to get back soon...In the NFL you shouldn't hurt your hamstring..you should be well stretched


Read that again and see if you wouldn't pick on yourself for that one.

#32 beastson52

beastson52

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 22-March 10
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 335
  • Reputation: 142
  • LocationEl Paso Tx
HUDDLER

Posted 03 August 2012 - 03:48 PM

I wouldn't worry about Murphy too much... yet. Lafell has been the same in all training caps since being drafted. Now if he consistently does this in preseason and games, then thats going to be a problem and a wasted trade :angry: !

#33 Pantherman

Pantherman

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 10-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,162
  • Reputation: 278
HUDDLER

Posted 03 August 2012 - 03:56 PM

I wouldn't worry about Murphy too much... yet. Lafell has been the same in all training caps since being drafted. Now if he consistently does this in preseason and games, then thats going to be a problem and a wasted trade :angry: !

Dude calm down. It ain't like we trade a 2nd rounder for Murphy or something. I don't consider a 7th round pick a hugh waste of a trade for Murphy. Chill out!! :)

#34 MadHatter

MadHatter

    The Only Voice of Reason

  • Joined: 30-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,918
  • Reputation: 5,441
  • LocationDark Side of the Moon
HUDDLER

Posted 03 August 2012 - 03:58 PM

Carolina Panthers@Panthers
DeAngelo, Tolbert and Stewart all lined up in backfield. With Cam, that gives opposing defenses a lot to worry about.


Would not really like that formation. A lot of rushing weapons in the backfield but would only have one WR and no TE in the game. Allows the defense to stack the box against the run.


#35 iamhubby1

iamhubby1

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 13-June 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,675
  • Reputation: 1,122
  • LocationSpartanburg, SC
HUDDLER

Posted 03 August 2012 - 03:59 PM

I do not want to worry, but you play like you practice. For the most part. The dropsies can become bothersome in a heartbeat for guys fighting for a position. If the coach cannot trust you... good luck.

That said, Murphy is new, and he seems to catch everything from DA and the jimmyz. Just maybe, he is trying too hard for Cam? He is outside his comfort zone, or some such idiotic thing.

Ah hellz, I say get it together if you want to see the field.

#36 Mage

Mage

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 31-January 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,654
  • Reputation: 801
HUDDLER

Posted 03 August 2012 - 04:01 PM

Would not really like that formation. A lot of rushing weapons in the backfield but would only have one WR and no TE in the game. Allows the defense to stack the box against the run.


We'll probably only run that formation in short yardage situations and on goal line.

But I'd love for a team to leave Smith on an island in man and you could still send Tolbert, Stew to the flats.

#37 Pantherman

Pantherman

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 10-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,162
  • Reputation: 278
HUDDLER

Posted 03 August 2012 - 04:03 PM

Would not really like that formation. A lot of rushing weapons in the backfield but would only have one WR and no TE in the game. Allows the defense to stack the box against the run.

How do you see that. Having 5 lineman and Cam,D will, Stewart, and Tolbert. Plus Smith at WR. Still leaves one spot open for a TE or WR on the other side. I think having all 4 guys on the field at the same time would be great. Still have Smith in as well along with another TE or WR. We be nice to see other teams try to figure out how to stop all of the guys at once. Chose your posion.

#38 La Pantera

La Pantera

    humpin' habanero

  • Joined: 22-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,863
  • Reputation: 802
  • LocationWinston-Salem
HUDDLER

Posted 03 August 2012 - 04:05 PM

Would not really like that formation. A lot of rushing weapons in the backfield but would only have one WR and no TE in the game. Allows the defense to stack the box against the run.


5 O-linemen,3 backs and Cam = 9. Leaves room for a WR and a TE or 2 WRs. If the D stacks the box they still don't know who'll get the ball or if its the option. It could be a screen and also leaves the WR one on one.

#39 mj4life

mj4life

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-March 10
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 944
  • Reputation: 28
HUDDLER

Posted 03 August 2012 - 04:08 PM

Would not really like that formation. A lot of rushing weapons in the backfield but would only have one WR and no TE in the game. Allows the defense to stack the box against the run.

you would still have a te in the game since the extra back is replacing a wr. not sure i would want to see this alot but this formation might give alot of teams fits. it gives you the option to run some power formations with the ability to still hurt teams in the passing game

#40 The Special One

The Special One

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 15-March 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,228
  • Reputation: 120
HUDDLER

Posted 03 August 2012 - 04:09 PM

Joe Person@josephperson
Nakamura working with first-team defense alongside Godfrey for third day in a row.

Looks like Nakamura has locked in that FS spot. Poor poor Martin.


Don't be surprised if we trade Sherrod Martin. We have good depth at safety, w/7 on our current roster and Sherrod is a FA after this year. We could get good value for him, certainly more than a 7th rounder.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users