Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

Where does the 2011 Panthers rushing offense rank all-time?

Wahh... GM pays stud RBs We are still a running team!

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
30 replies to this topic

#25 Stumpy

Stumpy

    Cam Ward Trolls Hard

  • Joined: 06-April 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,557
  • Reputation: 150
HUDDLER

Posted 17 August 2012 - 01:25 AM

WTF are you even talking about now. No one is saying we are going back the John Fox patented, run right, run left, draw, punt offense.

We have a truely innovative OC, a (hopefully) HOF WR and a true NFL dual threat QB. Of course we will pass the ball.

But we also have one of the most imposing ground attacks in the last 20 years, and have only improved it.

RR has repeatedly talked about dictating the game on offense and imposing their will on teams. Based on where we are investing our $/picks, I think its pretty obvious what that will will be.

#26 frash.exe

frash.exe

    Freddy Frashbear

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 15,216
  • Reputation: 5,806
HUDDLER

Posted 17 August 2012 - 01:32 AM

You can't dictate a game, no matter how many people tell you otherwise, especially with a point deficit. That's just not the way this game works. Every QB makes audibles, every coach makes adjustments even if they have a lead based on what their opponent is doing. "Imposing your will" isn't a strategy, it's a result if you know what your opponent is doing and can circumvent their efforts.

#27 ItsPantone278

ItsPantone278

    ItsPantone278

  • Joined: 06-January 11
  • posts: 1,940
  • Reputation: 334
SUPPORTER

Posted 17 August 2012 - 01:41 AM

They say you can't rush for a Super Bowl. Well.. maybe not with just one back...

#28 MaineManPanther

MaineManPanther

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,486
  • Reputation: 60
HUDDLER

Posted 17 August 2012 - 02:33 AM

Fact remains they probably saw the field together 10 times all year. Talent, sitting, watching....

Double Trouble is great. But a luxury. There are more important positions we need to worry about going forward. Not sure why this fanbase cares so greatly about having the best backup RB in the NFL as we continue to develop more holes seemingly every season at important positions.


So? The fact that they had less snaps in years prior , means they had more time to "sit and watch" in those years then they ever did in 2011. If talent wasted is defined by talent sitting and watching from the sidlines, then 2008-2010 wasted more then 2011.
The fact is we took advantage of there abillity and used them more then any other year since there inception.

How are the signings and holes related? What is it realistically preventing us from doing? For the next couple years no major Carolina players are heading into FA. The draft isnt a expensive. And In the ten years of the Hurney era we have rarley been a team that signs big market FA.

#29 CatMan72

CatMan72

    KEEP POUNDING

  • Joined: 04-January 09
  • posts: 15,697
  • Reputation: 2,871
SUPPORTER

Posted 17 August 2012 - 03:18 AM

6-10


Which had nothing to do with our defense, right?

#30 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,262
  • Reputation: 5,361
Moderators

Posted 17 August 2012 - 06:16 AM

Anybody who thinks that we just invested $50+m and a 2nd round pick in 3 integral pieces of our rushing attack, to heave the ball 40+ times a game, is functionally retarded.


2011 - we gave DeAngleo a monster deal. Our RBs then proceeded to rush the ball a franchise low number of times. Name a team in the NFL whose RBs had less rush attempts in 2011?

As a rookie Newton averaged 32 pass a attempts per game, factor in sacks they were asking him to do it roughly 34 times a game. In addition, he ran slightly over 7 times a game. So last year, over 40 times a game the ball was in the QBs hands asking him to make a play.

#31 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,743
  • Reputation: 8,013
Moderators

Posted 17 August 2012 - 06:25 AM

After the first two games last season you would get crucified here for suggesting that the team needed to run more...people just wanted to see Newton throw for 400 yards every game.

Now you get crap thrown at you if you don't agree that the team needs so much invested in running backs.

crap is flying both ways and i'm prety sure we're all wading in it on a daily basis around here.

victim stuff is weak.