Had he gotten caught this would be moot. But he's NEVER been caught. He's passed every test. And the USADA guy just keeps coming. When is enough, enough?
it really isn't that clear cut.
Posted 24 August 2012 - 10:18 AM
Had he gotten caught this would be moot. But he's NEVER been caught. He's passed every test. And the USADA guy just keeps coming. When is enough, enough?
Posted 24 August 2012 - 10:20 AM
There is NO foundation if he doesn't win get sponsors. There is NOTHING. What don't you understand about that? A lie is a lie no matter how you spin it. IF he cheated.what? Founded on a lie? That implies that bicycling takes moral precedent to cancer research. It also implies that he's somehow betraying the people that donated money to fight cancer by cheating in cycling.
Frankly, Americans never gave a shiat about the Tour until Armstrong started winning and nobody watches now that he's gone... Even amongst people that LOVE cycling, in every objective sense bicycle racing doesn't matter, cancer research does.
Posted 24 August 2012 - 10:20 AM
Yes, they want Lance for no reason. He's the victim and he's done nothing wrong. Got it.
Posted 24 August 2012 - 10:21 AM
There is NO foundation if he doesn't win get sponsors. There is NOTHING. What don't you understand about that? A lie is a lie no matter how you spin it. IF he cheated.
Posted 24 August 2012 - 10:23 AM
Posted 24 August 2012 - 10:28 AM
Posted 24 August 2012 - 10:34 AM
Posted 24 August 2012 - 10:35 AM
Posted 24 August 2012 - 10:36 AM
Posted 24 August 2012 - 10:36 AM
Posted 24 August 2012 - 10:57 AM
Posted 24 August 2012 - 10:59 AM
Posted 24 August 2012 - 12:04 PM
Posted 24 August 2012 - 12:12 PM
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users