Lance Armstrong drops fight against doping charges; title losses & lifetime ban pending
Posted 24 August 2012 - 12:20 PM
Posted 24 August 2012 - 12:36 PM
I actually care, I might not have raced road bikes but I've raced mountain bikes, he's long been a hero to me and the sport and has never tested positive. To me this is nothing more then a witch hunt.
i love when people get nationalistic about things they don't really care about.
Posted 24 August 2012 - 12:38 PM
Posted 24 August 2012 - 12:44 PM
Posted 24 August 2012 - 02:26 PM
Posted 24 August 2012 - 06:34 PM
Lance still won 7 Tours... against an entire field of riders, with all the team leaders likely doping as well.
Posted 31 August 2012 - 02:31 PM
Unlike Hamilton, I can’t offer dramatic proof that Armstrong doped—the evidence I saw and heard was convincing to me, but it was also circumstantial—but I can shed light on how he operates as a friend and an employer. This is relevant because Armstrong’s strongest remaining line of defense is that he’s a good guy who’s being victimized, a theme that permeated his statement last Thursday. He still doesn’t admit that he cheated, instead claiming that he’s walking away because USADA’s “charade” is rigged and the legal battles are taking too much of a toll on him and his family. “From the beginning,” he wrote, “this investigation has not been about learning the truth or cleaning up cycling, but about punishing me at all costs.”
The standard Armstrong defense starts with the naive assumption that it’s impossible to beat drug tests and usually rounds out like this: Even if Armstrong did cheat, he’s a person who came along when drugs were endemic to the sport of bike racing, and he got sucked into using them like many others did. But that era is behind us, so we should let it drop and move on, celebrating Armstrong for the good work he does as a cancer philanthropist. “Yes, Lance has 2B stripped of his 7 Tour de France titles now,” ESPN columnist Rick Reilly wrote in his Twitter feed. “Still, to millions, his work for cancer victims alone makes him a champion.”
The whole process was, in my opinion, grotesquely influenced by politics, faulty and inconsistent judgments, and outright lies. In my view, Armstrong was able to avoid answering my claims by using his power and influence. The judge allowed him to stall for months on giving a deposition, and the case was settled before he ever had to answer questions under oath.
I was powerless, and I was inaccurately portrayed by the media, thanks to Armstrong’s efforts at spinning the story. But I stuck by my principles, which I don’t regret. During the two years of my employment with Armstrong, I’d fulfilled my end of the agreement. I did more than required of any mere employee. I’d been his confidante, minder, protector, and more. For that, I got nuked.
Posted 31 August 2012 - 02:55 PM
Fair play to the guy though - he's used his influence to bully people into silence and he's stayed one step ahead of the testing game. If you ain't cheatin' you ain't tryin'.
Posted 31 August 2012 - 10:23 PM