Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

NanuqoftheNorth

Go Topless Day: Is America Ready For Topless Sunbathing?

Topless Beaches    28 votes

  1. 1. Cities and states set aside land for special interest groups like municipal golf courses. Should parts of beaches be set aside for topless sunbathing?

    • Yes, I believe in freedom and special topless sunbathing areas should be marked with signs and created.
    • No, I don't feel special areas should be set aside for topless sunbathing even if clearly marked.
    • I believe in equality. Anywhere men can go topless, women should be allowed to go topless too.
    • No, keep topless women behind closed doors.

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

302 posts in this topic

yeah it looks like you can quote mcp, whose post i already debunked, two borderline homophobic posts, one guy who made an entirely irrelevant comment about wal mart and another who freely admits that he has no idea what's going on. that actually sounds about right for you tbqh

just so we're clear here, you argue that the following isn't misogynistic:

The only negative side with that for men that like women is that not all breasts, and in fact most of them, aren't the perky nice ones... so you gotta take the bad with the good.

lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep quoting it, it says the same thing... and keep ignoring all the other stuff I said. You're really good at ignoring stuff... probably the only thing you're actually good at.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well you see the posters who respect women may have a difficult time understanding how this is anything but pure misogyny so if you could just clear this all up that would be fantastic

The only negative side with that for men that like women is that not all breasts, and in fact most of them, aren't the perky nice ones... so you gotta take the bad with the good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

posters such as this one

It's not so much a matter of interpretation as it is how it reads at face value. If you didn't mean it to read that way, you should have clarified it or not posted it at all. You didn't do that. You're just saying, "that's not what I said at all!". It literally reads as follows: "a downside to this would be having to see boobs that boob-lovers may not necessarily enjoy seeing. You have to take the good with the bad." That comes off as misogynistic. I'm not saying you are. I am saying that that is precisely how it reads and those words were YOUR words. So, the honorable thing to do would be to say, "I worded that badly. What I meant was....", if you indeed meant it another way.

The big deal here is that it is irrelevant for you to have mentioned that. That's what makes it look bad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well you see the posters who respect women may have a difficult time understanding how this is anything but pure misogyny so if you could just clear this all up that would be fantastic

I'm not explaining myself again, I've already done that, I can't help it if you can't read... and I responded to lightsout... you are such a hypocrit to proclaim to be the protector of others rights when you can do nothing but call names and personally attack others to try and make your pathetic points. You try to claim the moral high ground by biggest the biggest asshole possible... the height of hypocrisy... but then, I'm sure you're proud of it because of your twisted world view.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really only want to see about 20% of the tits out there. Therefore I do not support this initiative.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Having lived in a Mediterranean country with a top optional beach, it's wonderful. Of course it being Europe, people across the board looked a lot better lightly clothed.

Still, I'm glad on the Huddle we can still have debates more fitting of the 1950's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just hope that my post was one of the homophobic ones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Having lived in a Mediterranean country with a top optional beach, it's wonderful. Of course it being Europe, people across the board looked a lot better lightly clothed.

Still, I'm glad on the Huddle we can still have debates more fitting of the 1950's.

I started to bring this up as well. The first time I saw topless sunbathers, I reacted like I guess most American men would... "hey, I need to walk over THAT way to get a better look"

After a few times, I realized I was just being a little perv. I can't imagine the US having something like the Tropical Island Resort (indoor water park) in Berlin. One huge locker room/ dressing room for both sexes.... go to the shower, full of women.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah it looks like you can quote mcp, whose post i already debunked, ..........

smiley-laughing025.gif Yes, because denile and changing the story equals debunking. No wonder you are always right............... in your own mind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really only want to see about 20% of the tits out there. Therefore I do not support this initiative.

Should we hold our breath, and wait for 10 more pages of cantrell railing on Zod for being a misogynistic pig? I'm guessing NO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just hope that my post was one of the homophobic ones.

Apparently you aren’t doing it right, you have failed to get cantrell’s panties in a wad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites